Summary Of Morgan Scott Peck's People Of The Lie

1551 Words4 Pages

In 1983, Morgan Scott Peck published a book titled People of the Lie to diagnose what human evil is in a psychiatric perspective. This brings many arguments on whether human evil can be a form of disease that can be curable if examined or evil being a kind of certain personality profile. However, Peck’s own examination and what he considers evil behavior contradicts itself because, not only does he say certain actions or behaviors can be evil but he continues to say that the consistency of such behaviors actually makes for what he calls a sort of evil personality and an evil that he wants to regard as an illness. This paper will not support any argument but it will rather give a better understanding on what evil is in regards to narcissistic …show more content…

Despite the fact that Peck’s book is not mainly about narcissistic behavior it is something the reader must understand in order to balance the view of the whole topic of evil in People of the Lie. With the book we find that the subject of narcissism is just as complex as it is important. He begins defining narcissism with what Erich Fromm called “malignant narcissism”. Malignant, because aside from the egotism and self-absorption in narcissism there is also a cause for harm, danger, and suffering in this form of behavior. “Malignant Narcissism is characterized by an un-submitted will. In summary, to a greater or lesser degree, all mentally healthy individuals submit themselves to the demands of their own conscience. Not so the evil, however. In the conflict between their guilt and their will, it is the guilt that they must go and the will that must win. With malignant narcissism there is remarkable power in the manner in which the attempt to control others.” That is to say, human beings who are fit to follow their senses of right and wrong go by what they believe is moral. On the other hand when it involves evil, evil is what drives the conscience to regard that the wrong is what is will satisfy, give control and power to …show more content…

Going back to Charlene’s teaching case we will find many examples that comply with both sides. A point in which I come to an agreement with Peck, that narcissistic behavior is in fact regarded as a symptom to an evil personality is when Charlene is asked about the meaning of life in regards to religion and God. After she replied in a flat, monotone, and quivering tone of voice “I cannot do it.”, that the purpose of life is to glorify God, she continued “There is no room for me in that. That would be my death… I do not want to live for God. I will not. I want to live for me. My own sake!” This is a part, in which I consider Charlene being transparent in words, says a lot about her narcissistic behavior and evil personality. In other words, Charlene was not afraid to tell Peck, at that instance, what she really was thinking. Reading this quote makes me think of Charlene as more than just an egotistical person. Given that Charlene was stated in the book as a “dedicated religious person” and she brought God into the conversation as if he was a form of hindrance to her. One does not have to be devoted to God or know the bible begging to end to understand than in most religions the main person worshiped is God. With those words out not only is she presented as self-absorbed and malignant, she also presents a form of unashamed,

Open Document