Summary Of Carol Hay As A Victim Of Harassment

1906 Words4 Pages

Carol Hay argues that victims of harassment have obligations to confront perpetrators. She accentuates that this is necessary to not only preserve and protect the autonomy and moral agency of the victim herself but also those of others. She posits that when one negates to confront perpetrators they cause harm to women as a whole. In this essay I will argue that Hay’s argument I. Exposition In this section I will summarise Hay’s argument that victims of harassment have obligations to others. Her argument is as follows: a victim of harassment has a moral obligation to confront her harasser. A woman has a responsibility to sustain and protect her own autonomy and moral agency. For instance, David Foster Wallace has purported …show more content…

Accordingly, women have a moral obligation to preserve their own autonomy. A correlative aspect of this is that women have an obligation to challenge what undermines such autonomy and therefore moral agency as it causes moral harm. As such, the woman in the aforementioned scenario has an obligation to approach the ride operators because they cause harm to her as a member of the collective group of ‘women’. This additional moral duty is necessary in order to preserve autonomy, even though the imposition of the duty would impose an additional burden onto the victim. II. Key Issues and Themes I will now examine the main themes that are present within Hay’s article. The first key theme in this response is the importance of preserving one’s own autonomy. Hay views this principle as core to the recognition of what it means to be human and therefore protect moral agency. The second theme states that women should not be governed by male norms for the mere sake of avoiding conflict. The associated principle to this is that women must consider the broader consequences of their actions or inactions on the autonomy of their group as a whole. Further, the third theme is that the potential for one to act in response to harassment may cause harm although the degree of such harm does not undermine the general principle that one has a moral obligation to confront their

Open Document