Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of imperialism
Impacts of imperialism worldwide
The effect of imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Spanish American War Summary Throughout history, the United States of America has always been faced with making vital decisions to benefit as well as protect the country. Whether it was the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor or the stock market crash of 1929, America has constantly been encountered with tough difficulties and political leaders had to step up and generate a constructive resolution for America. In 1898, America was at a crossroad and was faced with a decision whether or not to enduringly annex territories as far away as the Philippines. At this point in time, the United States should grant the Philippines independence and gait away from the dangers of imperialism as well as becoming an empire because it will decrease racism between Americans and Filipinos and it will help America stay true to its moral values. To begin, by America walking away from an empire it will lessen racial issues between Filipinos and Americans. The Filipinos are incredibly diverse from the citizens of the United States; they speak a dissimilar language, they practice a different religion and they...
In 1900, Senator Albert Beveridge, a Republican from Indiana, gave a speech in response to “The Philippine Question”. Beveridge was asked by senators and members of the House of Representatives to give a speech on the Philippines. At this time, the United States was in discussion of what the future steps would be after the Spanish-American War, which resulted in a win and subsequent acquisition of the Philippines. Senator Beveridge responded to the idea that the United States should stay in the Philippines for its available resources for the United States, its impact it gives the United States in the Pacific Ocean, and the destiny the United States has in spreading democracy. Senator Albert Beveridge makes a strong argument of why the United States should stay in the Philippines; his arguments of commerce, world powers, and race are all strong for the United States, but there is a strong resistance from the Filipino people and their vocal leader Emilio Aguinaldo.
The first reason the United States should have annexed the Philippines is because it is our duty to as a country to spread the values of democracy overseas. For example, as stated here in Albert J. Beveridge’s campaign speech he says, “ Do we owe no duty to the world?… it is ours to save for liberty and civilization (Doc B).” He is saying that it is our duty as a sovereign nation to help an uncivilized nation modernize, industrialize, . another example, is from William Mcki...
... Americans built roads, schools, bridges, and sewers. Filipino self- rule had gradually increased and finally declared their independence on July 4, 1946. However, compared to Cuba and Puerto Rico, American rule has a lesser impact on the Philippine economy. The United States invaded Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines not to gain wealth, but for the purpose of getting trades.
The scene is set; America is the great power in the western hemisphere. Post Spanish-American War, America is faced with a dilemma of annexing the Philippines. In the winter of 1899 following the annexation of the Philippines, America had a problem. Filipinos had been fighting for independence from Spain and did not want to be seceded (83). Despite the Filipino objection, the United States displayed their assertion on the land. In conflict, both the Filipinos and American had many meetings with death. There were consequences and repercussions from invoking the American power on this foreign land. The American victory in the Spanish-American War helped propel the nation. Thesis: Although met with conflict from the natives, the
In 1899, the United States added the Philippines after a short yet bleeding war with Spain. These rich, copious islands brimming with assets were in extraordinary request. The U.S. saw the Philippines; battling against Spain so like them when they were revolting, and chose to venture in and help 'the soul of 1776' (Doc. A). Be that as it may, the question still remains: ought to the United States have attached the Philippines? The answer is a vehement no. It was a misuse of cash and assets, they were as merciless and unbendable as Spain as they would see it of how to treat the locals, and it conflicted with every single administrative conviction the U.S. remained for. Adding the Philippines was not an insightful choice.
President William Mckinley states his opinion about the subject in James Rusling, “Interview with President William Mckinley.” William Mckinley said, “...we could not leave them to themselves - they were unfit for self-government - and hey would soon have anarchy and misrule over there worse than Spanish’s was…” Considering the fact that they were just liberated from the Spanish, the Philippines was definitely incapable of self-governing. The idea of freedom was new to them and they might misuse that power over themselves. The Philippines will struggle to govern their country due to lack of experience and the guidance of the United States will help them to start it but the United States will over empowered the philippine sand will end up acting similar to Spain. Therefore, there were legit reasons to annex the Philippines but immorality of it is the most reasonable argument why the United States should not annex the
S- The author of this source is Mark Twain. The subject of this source independance. They created the Anti-Imperial League and wanted to battle the American annexation of the Philippines. The Americans made an alliance with the trusting Filipinos, and then gained Manila land side.
The Spanish Civil War occurred in Spain, during the years of 1936-1939 primarily. This Civil War was a result of a military revolt against the government, which was Republican, controlling Spain at the time. This military revolt was lead by a military coup, which tried to take control of the entire country of Spain, failing, beginning the Civil War. Just as in any other Civil War, there were two sides fighting against one another, the Nationalists and the Fascists. The Nationalists were also known as the rebels, receiving aid from Nazi Germany and Fascists Italy. The Republicans, the other side of the war, were receiving aid from the Soviet Union, Europe, and the United States. While, this Civil War did start as a result from the failed attempt of the rebels to take over the country, they had reasons behind their revolting. The Civil War was a result of the lives of the citizens and the politics, in Spain, that had been building up over the several previous years. There was a difference of social and economic standing between the Nationalists and Fascists. The Nationalists/rebels were higher up in society, being the Roman Catholics, military men, landowners, and businessmen. On the other hand, the Republicans/Fascist were the educated middle class, being the urban workers of the country. It was seen that the Nationalists were somewhat better compared to the Fascists because of the positions they held compared to the others.
During the Spanish-American war Filipinos were very active in fighting the Spanish. Due to U.S. actions they were under the impression that they would be granted independence at the end of the conflict. Near the end of the Spanish-American war, on June 12, 1898, the Filipinos declared the Philippines an independent nation. When the war was over the U.S. government purchased the Philippines from Spain to, as President McKinley put it, “uplift and civilize and Christianize them” (. When the Americans arrived, they took control of Manila and designated a perimeter which the Filipino rebels could not enter. On February 4, 1899 a Filipino man trying to cross the U.S. lines was shot and killed by an American soldier. That night there was an exchange of fire between the opposing armies. The next day, Emilio Aguinaldo, the leader of the rebel forces, sent someone to explain that the firing had been against his orders and to propose a neutral zone, but General Otis of the U.S. refused. This conflict was what led to the Philippine-American war (World Future Fund). As many as 1,000,000...
Teller said that “we should not leave the Philippines, in a worse condition than they had begun with, as prey for another country to come and rule. Instead we should support them morally, let them build their selves up as their own country, and protect them from any imposing country.” (Ladenburg The Philippines). Senator McLaurin thought in the form of religious conquest. He stated “it is not God’s will for us to expand and rule over other nations similar to manifest destiny. We should not get involved in any rivalries and just stay a peaceful, supporting country. We should allow the Philippines to build up themselves much like we did in our time.” (Ladenburg The Philippines). Senator Lodge was supporting American Imperialism of the Philippine islands because “they have resources that are untouched that we could make a profit from and it could provide as a great foreign import,” but Senator Caffery explained why this argument is invalid by saying “the costs for our country will exceed the profits because we don’t trade with far Eastern countries and civilians along the equator live off very little. Not only this but we can keep the Philippines as an ally for trade to where we can still have a supply of these rich resources” (Ladenburg The Philippines). Not only that, but America is doing what Britain did to them when they became a
The Philippines played a larger part in the Spanish-American War than most may like to believe. The Philippine-American War as it could be called is forgotten to most everyone in all of United States Military history. The events that occurred in the Philippines could be mildly compared to the events that occurred nearly seventy years later in Vietnam. The reasons for the war occurring at all are directly related to the Filipino’s attempts to gain independence from Spain. Lead by Emilio Aguinaldo, the Filipino people fought for one year for independence from Spain with a shortage of weapons, ammunition and food. A treaty with the Spanish Authorities was forced in 1897, and Aguinaldo and his government were forced into exile with payment of four hundred thousand pesos. American Consuls residing in many Asian countries, as well as Hong Kong, where Aguinaldo was exiled to, agreed with Aguinaldo to give the Philippines independence, as long as they helped the United States defeat the Spanish. Commodore George Dewey of the United States Navy was to lead Aguinaldo back to the Philippines. He only brought Aguinaldo back to Luzon, the northern-most island of the Philippines. Dewey continued to refuse to support Aguinaldo now though, and Aguinaldo once again controlled the Philippines, which was still under attack by Spanish forces.
Some believed the Filipino people needed to be civilized, others said it would give America a way in to the Asian markets, others believed it was for the best of the native people that America acquire it instead of the Germans or Japanese, and others believed it was survival of the fittest and in order for America to survive it needed to acquire territories. In February of 1899 Congress agreed to acquire the Philippines. The Filipino people did not agree with this and fought back in a war that resulted in America using similar tactics the Spanish used including concentration camps. The American people did not agree with this war but before anything else could be done the military had all ready suppressed the Filipinos and maintained its grip on the
Miller provides an account of the American-Philippines war from 1899-1903, revealing aspects of United States imperialism that are often forgotten. Miller provides both a military history as well as a demonstration of the way America lied and forgot its history, justifying war and colonization as a step for greater good. America's involvement in the Philippines is sometimes remembered as an act to protect Filipino's from Spain, and to "teach' them American democracy. Other historians look to the war as a part of American imperialism linked to its capitalist and racist nature. Many other historians argue that imperialism was a short lived mistake in American history that was just one stumble in the country's greatness. Miller's account shows, in great detail, the slipperiness of events which happened, and the ways in which individuals can hold the power of nations. Generally America's conquest of the Philippines is understood to be motivated by the expansion of democracy. The United States was already actively expanding and conquering land and people, but for the most part they were doing so in regions thought to be geographically logical. Expanding to the west was not considered colonization, but once the U.S. reached the far away islands of the Philippines, their actions seemed to need a larger explanation to be justified. The United States moving beyond its natural proximity made the Philippines a more problematic site, and therefore easier to understand as an act of imperialism.
There were several policies in place at the time, some which were put into place before the war, some during the war, and some after. The ratification of the annexation process was long and difficult. There were debates as to how to treat the Filipino people. One suggestion was to treat the Filipinos as dependents, and not citizens, like the Native Americans came to be treated. Many of the imperialists believed that the Filipinos were savages and harsh policies would give America control. The anti-imperialists were not exactly sure whether to treat them as peers or to set them free. I would treat them as equals, as normal people, as they are like everyone else. At the time they might not have been as technologically advanced as we were, and their government may have seemed primitive to ours. I think we should have worked with them to help create a government, rather than occupy and just take over.
They, like many other immigrants, also wanted freedom and independence from colonial rule. According to “Philippine Independence from the Americans,” the Filipino people did not feel as if they had the freedom that they desired and consistently revolted against the Spanish rule during the 19th century. Because of many failed attempts and tragedy from the revolutions, they would have to find a new way to break free from the Spanish colony. During the Spanish-American War in 1896 the Philippine citizens seized the chance to help Americans win the war in hope that they will win the freedom that they longed for (“Philippine Independence from the Americans”). The success for the Americans became a gain in the fight for independence for the Philippine country since the Spanish were no longer in control of the Philippines due to the Treaty of Paris in 1898 (Asis). However, as the freedom they sought for was still not entirely given to the people, the Philippines would be trapped in yet another war within the next coming