Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media impact on bias
Social media over the years has changed greatly due to the advancements in technology. In past years, news was only made by a selected few organizations, but nowadays news can be shared by anyone at any time. Fake news has been becoming more popular by the day, and many people even gain profit by posting these articles. Most people get their news from online media sites, and some sites even post fake news articles that can be difficult to pinpoint. False news is beginning to become pervasive in social media sites, causing these media platforms to struggle to get rid of these articles. Although this is a struggle, there are still a great deal of ways to identify the validity of the news they read. In this day and age, flawed and inaccurate …show more content…
These social media platforms don’t want to hire human editors because they worry this could make these articles vulnerable to bias (Dwoskin). Since people have their own opinions on subjects this could create a problem while trying to pick out the articles that are fake because of bias. People with partisan bias could remove articles they dislike, and not care whether the articles were factual or imprecise. Social media sites claim that “they have little responsibility to exert editorial control over the news they deliver to billions of people” (Dwoskin). This causes a problem because if these sites cannot control how much false news is spread to billions of people, than this will cause a harder time to get rid of these articles since the sources cannot control these articles. Social media platforms rely on the algorithms of the site but “the social media softwares cannot detect false news” (Real). Since these social media sites mostly rely on algorithms and equations it cannot detect fake news. This makes it harder to detect fake news since now the sites will have to switch over from technology to human editors to detect these articles. Most people in the social media community want these sites to do something about this major problem since some of these sites have a big share in the social media community (Dwoskin). Since many of these media sites are well known …show more content…
While reading an article, a interesting headline may lure people in, but not always does the title tell the whole story (Eugene and Robertson). While reading a news article, do not always judge the story just by the title, often cases the headline does not reveal the full truth. Make sure to read past the headline before sharing the articles on social media, as you read through the articles check for signs to see if the article is trustworthy. There are many ways to tell whether an article is false or not, but “another tell-tale sign of a fake story is often by the byline” (Eugene and Robertson). By researching the author and distinguishing to see if this person is famous for creating false news stories, or by seeing if this person is real is an important way to tell whether the article is real or fake. An unfamiliar website covered in ads should also be a way to draw in suspicion (Robins). Since these false news websites make money off plastering ads on their sites, there will usually be a profusive amount of ads on the articles. Often times searching up a sites name and glancing at other articles it posts should help decide whether the site is trustworthy or not. By posting the URL of the website into a fake news detector site should help people detect whether the article is false or real. Given these facts we can clearly see that
Fake news on social media is one way that causes mankind to rebel against one another's beliefs and ideas. Everyday we may come across or see some type of fake news
One of the first things to do is to consider the source of the news. This can be done by going through the website/profile of the purported news agency. In many cases, the websites involved in spreading fake news have scanty information about their contacts, physical location, objective,
Social media has been very popular due to different social networking sites, blog sites and video sites including podcasts. Social media sites run by a particular group or person cannot avoid to be biased though and we all know this. There are some who pays a particular domain or site to say or do their bidding and that is normal part of the social media. With the use of social media, we can gather a lot of information as well considering that this information comes from different group of people based on their backgrounds and point of view as well as their cultural differences.
Over the past couple of decades, we are all aware that social media has had a great impact on us and the way we think. Social media has revolutionized the way people communicate and socialize on a daily basis. It has been spreading propaganda on how we should live our lives, how to act, what’s right and wrong, what’s good for us and many more. It is double edge sword that hinders people’s abilities to think for their self, but has open such a vast world to share one another 's opinions in a matter of seconds on the internet or television.
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
Thus, causing the public to view journalists and their news organization as unethical. Because a trusted major news organization reported a false story the public became skeptical of all news organizations. Thus, the one false story got more attention causing citizens to question all journalists’
The articles "Are These Stories True? (Nope)", by Adee Braun and Kristin Lewis, and "The Story that Got Away", retold by Debby Waldman, are both about fake news. One thing about fake news, is sometimes how believable article are. For instance, some stories hold many things that regular articles have and are written a lot like real stories. This is stated in the first article, it writes that fake stories can "Come with photos and believable quotes" (Braun and Lewis, 10). If the article sounds real and it holds many similar text features, most people would not think about if it is a joke. Also, the bold letters at the top of a news story or a website that looks and appears real can be tricky to identify. For example, Later in the beginning article, it focuses that fake news
In order to have a functioning democracy, citizens must be well informed on current events. The public obtains their news from a variety of sources including television, newspapers, and social media. For decades, the spread of social media has become an increasing challenge and citizens are constantly faced with the problem of deciding if the information they are consuming is real or fake. Without the ability to determine this, citizens are unable to make informed decisions on who they should elect to represent them in government.
Anyone who access to the Internet can post a wide range of data without having to experience the essential procedure of confirming the information. Most of the news and data on the online networking were originated from various sources while the mainstream news endure a variety of analysis and editorial gatekeeping to ensure the validity of messages delivered. However, Wilson et al. (2011) said that the news’ consumers unable to distinguish the reality from fiction, and may believe whatever they have read through online. In spite of media’s accessibility and utilization as sources of information, it has changed numerous things around us and changed our perspectives toward the news that we were not aware of in the past and made us think beyond of
Social media is a revolutionary way to connect to friends and family through a single app much like Facebook. Also allowing the public to be more informed on current events whether that would be an issue in today 's society all the way to a heartwarming story or a funny video. Although this sounds amazing and the fact that this type of news outlet is practically new. An issue arises that involves “fake news” and with that comes many opinions on what to do about it. I believe that people browsing these platforms should have a little bit of skepticism behind each story and if it the topic truly intrigues someone then they should look into the topic on a reliable resource before passing on the authors misinformation.
Social media is a fascinating and compelling form of interaction between people all over the world. It allows us to dispatch information to the public swiftly but unlike broadcasting through radio or television, there is no gatekeeper. Information that is put on the Internet never really goes away and because of its instantaneous feed to the public, it can cause irreparable damages. These damages include a rising growth of defamation cases involving online content found on social networks. Social media has become a hotspot for potentially libelous statements.
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
Fake news is a very controversial subject in today’s world. Some people like it, some people hate it, and some people profit from it. The main problem with fake news is not that the content is false, but that there is so much false information around that it is hard to distinguish the real reports from the phony ones. If this is the case, then why has no one done anything about this issue? Fake News may be a growing problem in today’s world, but the amount being released is not going to decrease anytime soon because people love to read, write, and share fake news.
In this day and age, people have nearly unlimited access to information. Despite this fact, truth in the media is often difficult to determine. People of all ages and educational backgrounds can fall for false news, making it frustrating to know for sure if what you read is trustworthy. Fake news is often more prominent through social media outlets due to its increasing popularity and accessibility. Many news stories look and sound real and are hard to differentiate from real news. The damage created by spreading these false stories has had harsh, and often long lasting effects, with negative outcomes spreading faster than those who try to set the record straight.
Social media is a quick and easy way to spread news and information across the world. However, the common saying, “you can’t believe everything you see on the internet,” is true. Social media allows the spread of unreliable and false information. A study done by the American Press Institute found, “64% of people who use Twitter for news say that they have encountered something they "later discovered wasn't true," and 16% of Twitter news users say that "they had retweeted or posted a tweet they later discovered to be false” (API). This can have various effects as people are falsely educated which can lead to some bad or unnecessary decisions.