Social Criticism In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World

1179 Words3 Pages

Neil Postman a contemporary social critic made a statement about two novels known as Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and 1984 by George Orwell. Neil Postman’s passage compared the novels to relate them to the year 1985, and Neil stated that Huxley’s Brave New World correlated more to his surroundings than the novel that is written exactly for the time period Postman wrote his passage. Postman’s assertion has been correct throughout time even in 2016. In the twenty first century the human body is not seen as something owned by someone anymore, but as something owned by ourselves. Some people use their bodies in a way that does not correlate to emotion or love, but as something to please basic human instinct, and Aldous Huxley made this statement clear in his book which made this relate to the world in 2016. George Orwell oppressed basic human instinct and created a taboo; even though prostitution is a taboo in the twenty first century, it has always been frowned upon. Orwell also saw the world turned into something that stripped away the freedom of the people, and the people knew that “Big Brother” took it away. Huxley saw the world turned into a place where the people never found out what they missed because they did not want it. Neil Postman’s assertion about contemporary society is supported since Brave New World brings the concept of soma which correlates to ecstasy, the overload of technology and style and …show more content…

They used this drug called “soma” to bring themselves into a happy place and distracts the people to come to a realization that they are being enslaved. This drug correlates a lot to ecstasy which has the effects of feeling content and makes the person taking it feel out of their realm and in a new world. Soma is used to calm down the citizens and to heighten the good moods, which Ecstasy does as well. There are many teens who take MDMA to feel happy and

Open Document