Social Class Vs. Caste System

822 Words2 Pages

There were many differences between class and caste. Social class was a lot more lenient than the caste system, for it referred to more of the political and economic standing of a person. Different classes were often distinguished by the amount of money that each person or family could attain, or the amount of land they owned because in these second wave civilizations land was often times equivalent to wealth. It was easier to change classes than it was to change castes, for some merchants, who were looked down on by society may be able to amass great amounts of wealth and be able to move their way into the scholar-gentry class during the Han Dynasty. However, the caste system was extremely harsh, and it was nearly impossible to change your caste. Caste was one of the earliest social distinctions made in India, and was based on specialization of labor, …show more content…

In theses societies, such as India, the peace among the people was maintained because of the inequality of people in the caste system. The caste system made sure that everyone in society had their own place, which kept those who were the ‘untouchables’ or the shudras from rebelling, for fear of being reincarnated to an even worse place in their next lives. Similarly, the slave-based society in the Mediterranean supported the idea that social inequality was accepted because the slaves were used by the majority of people to carry out immense amounts of labor, and the class system in China. While there was a lot of support for the social inequalities, there was also resistance that occurred mostly on a small-scale. Some of this resistance included theft, defiance, sabotage. Whereas more large-scale resistance came in the form of rebellions such as those of Spartacus and the Yellow Turban Uprising peasant

More about Social Class Vs. Caste System

Open Document