Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
Slavery pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
Tessa
Burning Issues
Slavery
Slavery should be legal in some states because the owners need the help they can get, slaves can still get freedom by going into the north, and this can keep the economy from flopping.
The constitution should not allow slave trade because the constitution states that all men are equal, they should be brought to the northern states first to get equal opportunity, and if slave trade is outlawed it gives other slaves hope for freedom and more motivation.
They should not be forced to return runaway slaves because once they are in the north they are free, it would be against the law to force a free man to do anything, and once they are in the north they no longer have a owner they need to return to.
2. The federal
…show more content…
I think the bonds should be payed back just a small amount to each dollar because not everyone agreed with the war, so why should they pay for it? They could already be in debt, they could reward the soldiers but also keep people from being in poverty.
4. Everyone should be allowed to vote in general elections. I believe this because, if you live in America you should be allowed to vote for who controls your country. People of all races should vote because they are a big part of America's population. Even if you don't have property, you should be able to vote for someone you think could help you.
Historical Roles
Southern Planter
1.I make my money by planting tobacco seeds. My wealth depends on my slaves. My family owns about thirty slaves so I am quite wealthy.
2. I think slavery is important and that all slaves are property. The amount of money I make depends on my slaves. I think slaves do the hardest work.
3. ‘The rabble’ people scare me. I think they want to take my property. I am surprised these people can vote in some places!
4. I am concerned about non property owners voting. I am also concerned about debts being paid back in kind and not cash. I believe this is only fair.
…show more content…
Is it legal for state legislatures to pass laws allowing debts to be paid “in kind”? Well the constitution says, No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. In other words, only the federal government can conduct foreign alliances, trade, or war. Only the federal government can print money. Only the federal government can make and pass laws or break contracts.
Slave insurrection occurred in a multitude of ways. Slaves practiced everyday resistance as well as planned and executed more elaborate forms of resistance. One form of resistance was strikes. During a strike Negros would flee to the swamps or forests and send back word that they would return if their demands were made. Demands would often include food, clothes, fewer beatings, shorter hours, or a new overseer. If demands were met they would return. However during the Civil War the demand of payment of wages. During this era they won “lifting themselves by their own bootstraps from chattels to wage workers”.3
The indeed started to return all the runaway slaves back to the south. The united states kept trying to defend the rights of slaves owner throughout other countries but the federal government was all for slavery so they bumped heads. Therefore the abolitionists began a petition asking for the congress to end slavery in columbia which the national government controlled. As the petition got to the congress the southerners became infuriated and decided to go out and kill those abolinistor who was promoting to end slavery.Abolitionist and the anti slavery advocates stated that “ the federal fugitive slave act was unconstitutional “ because it does not give specifically give congress permission to return all the runaway slaves and “ the act’s provisions deprived accused runaways of various right specified in the bill of rights” . In Prigg v. Pennsylvania , the supreme court over ruled the act and its guaranteed the slave owner and catcher the rights to hold all slaves without going to court for seizing them.The state 's law is considering that as kidnapping and requires proof. Now in the south slave owner would not have to prove
There was no significant desire among most delegates to abolish slavery during the 1787 Constitutional Convention. In addition, the focus of the convention was on forming a more perfect union, not dealing with the issue of slavery (Dolbeare, 71). Also complicating things was the concern among some delegates that putting too much weight on the issue of slavery might cause the unification process to fall apart. This resulted in the Constitution containing a series of compromises regarding slavery, and blatantly avoiding the issue of slavery.
Pro-slavery and anti-slavery were groups of advocates who both had a different perspective about slavery. The group of people that believed in slavery were mainly from the South and they were usually businessmen, traders, farmers, and slave traders. They argued that slavery was right; slavery caused a growth in the nation’s economy, it was accepted in the bible, and the slaves were better taken care of in the hands of a master. On the other hand, the Northerners thought otherwise. On their behalf, they argued that the slaves were treated poorly by their masters, it was a sin to be involved in slavery, and the Africans were unhappy because they were forced to move from their homeland. The pro-slavery authors of the articles gave support to their
Since the beginning of slavery in the America, Africans have been deemed inferior to the whites whom exploited the Atlantic slave trade. Africans were exported and shipped in droves to the Americas for the sole purpose of enriching the lives of other races with slave labor. These Africans were sold like livestock and forced into a life of servitude once they became the “property” of others. As the United States expanded westward, the desire to cultivate new land increased the need for more slaves. The treatment of slaves was dependent upon the region because different crops required differing needs for cultivation. Slaves in the Cotton South, concluded traveler Frederick Law Olmsted, worked “much harder and more unremittingly” than those in the tobacco regions.1 Since the birth of America and throughout its expansion, African Americans have been fighting an uphill battle to achieve freedom and some semblance of equality. While African Americans were confronted with their inferior status during the domestic slave trade, when performing their tasks, and even after they were set free, they still made great strides in their quest for equality during the nineteenth century.
Europeans, for they were their main labor source. So in a desperate attempt they turned to the next best thing, african slaves.
Reparations Although the talk of reparations of slavery has been in discussion for over a hundred years, it is beginning to heat up again. Within these discussions, the issue of the form of reparations has been evaluated and money has been an option several times. However, reparations in the form of money should not be obtained for several reasons. Firstly, it is not a solution to the problem, secondly monetary reparations have the ability to worsen discrimination, thirdly, who gets paid, and how is it regulated, and lastly, the money can be misused.
Constitutionally the North favored a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution, and they wanted to grant the federal government increased powers. The South wanted to reserve all undefined powers to the individual states themselves. The South relied upon slave labor for their economic well being, and the economy of the North was not reliant on such labor or in need of this type of service. This main issue overshadowed all others. Southerners compared slavery to the wage-slave system of the North, and believed their slaves received better care than the northern factory workers received from their employers. Many Southern preachers proclaimed that slavery was sanctioned in the Bible. Southern leaders had constantly tried to seek new areas into which slavery might be extended (Oates 349).
B. My views are better than my opponents views, because the 2nd Amendment in the "Bill of Rights"
From 1750 until 1800 the colonial United States endured a period of enormous achievement along with a substantial amount of struggle. Before 1750, the new colony’s first struggle was between the colonists and England over who would have leadership within the New World. Once settled, the issues emerged from within the colonies themselves, particularly with the “belongings” they brought and imported. African American slaves were seen as property, and were not given any innate rights such as liberty or freedom when following their master to the New World. The revolution for the colonists from England began, with new freedoms received by the colonists; the slaves began to question their rights as humans. Innate rights such as liberty and freedom
...ens, it should ensure that these rights are protected. Though the government has programs like charity work, social and public works that require funding by citizens, it should not get the funds by involuntarily taxing citizens. If it does so then it will be stealing from citizens which are a criminal offence. By voluntarily supporting these activities, the citizens will be helping the needy citizens who are unable to adequately support themselves. The government should ensure that every citizen has an access to all his basic needs but those who are well off should also assist the government in supporting the less fortunate.
In the whole constitution, not a single word says that slavery is good, and is needed for society. Some argue that this point is made because the northern free state delegates wanted to ban slavery, but the southern slave states wanted slavery, or they were out. The idea was that the northern free states would hint that they didn't want slavery, because they still didn’t want slavery.
Underneath the talk of states’ rights, expansion, tariffs, and railroads there was always slaves, toiling on southern plantations and growing in number each day. As the country entered the nineteenth century, politicians found the unanswered issue of slavery demanded attention. This attention was necessary not only because of the expanding country, welcoming new states into the fold, but because of the slaves themselves and their actions. Despite talk of other political issues crucial to politicians as the years crept toward the Civil War, slavery was constantly an undertone in each debate. The presence of slaves and free blacks throughout the United States of America influenced both northern and southern politicians to create legislation that
My stance on slavery is that I thought it was great, having people do your work for you. I personally think that slavery should still exist, I feel like they should still be around and do our stuff for us. Yes some people may think that's lazy and very wrong but it my opinion on it should still be around today. If slavery was around today many lives will be much easier and other people in the house can be free to do anything. Just think about it a maid or butler could be seen as a slave. They get paid to do stuff for the person that's paying. Slaves and maid are very similar in a way. All around the world there is still slavery going on.
a. Citizens support their community government by voting for community issues, and being a "good" citizen.