Similarities Between The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time And Rubbernecker

2164 Words5 Pages

The development of a person is heavily influenced by the relationship they share with their parents. The psychoanalytic lens regarding personality is prevalent in Mark Haddon’s novel, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, and in Belinda Bauer’s book, Rubbernecker. As explained by Dennis O’Neil: “There are many potential factors that are involved in shaping a personality. These factors are usually seen as coming from heredity and the environment” (O’Neil, Process of Socialization: Personality Development). In both novels, the main characters share a limited maternal bond, a loss of father, and needing to deal with parental roadblocks. The relationship a son has with his parents impacts his emotional development. Usually the mother …show more content…

They look up to their father as their hero and role model resulting them attempting to be like them. “The absence of parental relationships can also have an effect on children and adolescents” (Lauren B. Childers, Parental Bonding in Father-Son Relationships). In The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, Christopher’s relationship with his father is strong until problems arise causing him to lose trust. Christopher’s father becomes extremely frustrated with his son and explodes at him: “Father had never grabbed hold of me like that before…But Father was a more levelheaded person, which means he didn’t get angry as quickly and he didn’t shout as often. So I was very surprised when he grabbed me…But Father didn’t let go, and he was shouting. And I hit him again…” (Haddon Page 82-83). The physical violence Christopher experienced from his father causes him to lose trust in him. It is abnormal for his father to behave in such a manner and so it is frightening. The new point in their father-son relationship as Christopher is no longer are of how his father will react. Christopher’s father confesses that he is the one who murdered Wellington and lied to Christopher about his mother. Christopher responds: “I had to get out of the house. Father had murdered Wellington. That meant he could murder me, because I couldn’t trust him, even though he had said, ‘ Trust me,’ because he had told a lie about a …show more content…

Lack of maternal bonds that Christopher and Patrick have with their mothers affects how they cope with stress and respond to affection from others. The loss of trust for Christohper’s father also impacts how he now interacts with him as he no longer feels safe enough to trust him. As for Patrick, the death of his father causes him to seek answers about death, but he discovers more that what he had planned. The roadblocks created by their parents impact how the characters learn to overcome them and to push forward on their journeys. The importance of a strong and healthy relationship between parents and their son is seen through development: “A child at this age largely only interacts with his or her parents; therefore, they are the main source of trust and mistrust in the child’s life. If parents have a trusting and supportive relationship with their child, then the child overcomes the crisis and establishes the virtue of hope” (Kelsey Sharpe, Parental Influence on the Development of

Open Document