Similarities Between Harwood And Heaney

1041 Words3 Pages

Robert Frost, Seamus Heaney, and Gwen Harwood explore similar ideas in their poetry, creating an emotional reaction in readers through the use of stylistic features. The poets’ use of contrast, imagery, allusion, and caesura in the exploration of familial relationships, death, and loss of innocence to manipulate and emphasise the reader’s emotional response. Familial roles are explored by Harwood and Heaney to evoke emotional reactions from the reader. Section one of Harwood’s ‘Father and Child’ explores the narrative of a “wisp-haired” child experiencing a loss of innocence after maiming a barn owl in rebellion against her “old No-sayer” father while he was “robbed of power by sleep”. Section two draws upon and contrasts this description …show more content…

Notably, in Heaney’s ‘Mid-Term Break’, death is explored through a school boy receiving news of his brother’s death. Frequent caesura in the poem is used to disrupt the pace set by the iambic pentameter, giving the reader an insight into the confusion and grief felt by the persona as the writing begins to lose its flow. When the persona meets his “father crying –” despite that the father had “always taken funerals in his stride”, the caesura after the mention of crying signifies the distress of the family. Heaney does this to build up the drama, making it more devastating when the brother’s death is revealed. Contrastingly, Frost’s poem ‘Out, out-’, uses personification to emphasise the distress of death. The saw that kills the boy, “snarled and rattled… seemed to leap”, which gives the instrument human qualities, evoking a heightened sense of distress in the reader at death. ‘Mid-term Break’ uses the technique of allusion in regards to the “poppy bruise on his temple”. This line simultaneously emphasises the superficiality of the injury that killed the brother, and alludes to the dead soldiers of the First World War, while the “snowdrops and candles (soothing) the bedside” symbolise death and funerary rituals. These allusions have the effect of evoking mental images from the reader and guiding them to draw parallels between poem and other events, both historical and personal. This technique is …show more content…

Heaney’s ‘Blackberry-Picking’ makes use of simile to provide contrast between the innocent act and the loss of innocence coupled an aftermath of inevitable disappointment. The berries, “sweet like thickened wine”, take a negative connotation when they are subsequently described to “burn like a plate of eyes”. There is contrast between the idyllic day picking blackberries and the aftermath, in which the “lovely canfuls smelt of rot”. The rhyming couplet to end the poem, in which the persona “hoped they’d keep, knew they would not” is used to place emphasis on the line and the idea proposed in it; that innocence is inevitably and disappointingly lost, just as seasons change and fruit rots. Innocence is also explored by Harwood in ‘The Secret Life of Frogs’, in which parenthesis as the persona “(… thought a brothel was a French hotel)” is used to enclose the childhood thoughts, emphasising to the reader this childish innocence. The parenthesis also changes the tone of the poem by interspersing serious discussion of war with the misinterpretation of the adult concept of brothels. Innocence is also conveyed by Harwood through the imagery of the frogs, symbolically killed by both schoolboys and “jerries”, but held by the children “in hands that would not do them wrong”. The contrasting imagery between the brutal way frogs are “[blown]

Open Document