Similarities Between Dracula And Frankenstein

1408 Words3 Pages

Monster Theory The unexplainable creatures with human like features in the stories Frankenstein and Dracula are sadistic beings who cause devastation and distress for the main characters until the time of their downfall. These two classic horror monsters have similar character types which dissimilarity in many ways. Each story includes a hero and villain that draw the reader in to wanting to understand the monster and Dracula more. In Frankenstein, the monster was never given a name by Victor Frankenstein who was his creator. Victor created him for selfish reasoning without thinking of the consequences. When Victor achieved the creation of the monster he took one great look at him; he was disappointed and horrified of what was before him. …show more content…

For the rest, his ears were pale, and at the tops extremely pointed; the chin was broad and strong, and the cheeks firm though thin. (Stoker 15).
The monster is a creation that is horribly ugly and has superhuman strength. Because of his appearance, people are frightened by him, despite the fact that he is actually quite subdued and gentle at times. His appearance repels people, but there is also great interest in him. Dracula is also a frightening and intimidating figure, but in a different way. He is more human in appearance, but is surrounded by mystery.
Their appearance is not only thing different, their motives were also different. Frankenstein’s monster and Dracula had two very different motives for their destructive behaviors. The monster just wanted to be loved and accepted by people. He wanted people to see beyond his looks and like him for who he was. The monster’s motive for being destructive, thus, was simply because it had been overcome by constant rejection, without having been given a chance to be accepted. Rejection for most people is hard, so one can understand why the monster felt the way he did. He could not handle peoples’ judgment of …show more content…

He relies on an empathy that is in attendance only in himself. He tried to be friends with some of the people who hated him, and even saved a young girl from drowning; nevertheless he was still treated without a degree of respect. “There was none among the myriads of men that existed who would pity or assist me; and should I feel kindness towards my enemies? No; from that moment I declared everlasting war against the species, and more than all, against him who had formed me and sent me forth to this insupportable misery” (Shelley 137-138). He even tried to be friends with some of the people who hated him. This flawed assumption sets him up for disillusionment. On the other hand, Dracula’s motives were different. Dracula had completely different reasons for being wicked. He was evil for his pleasure. Dracula was a monster from the beginning, seeking out the perfect victims for selfish reasons. “My revenge is just begun! I spread it over centuries, and time is on my side. Your girls that you all love are mine already, and through them you and others shall yet be mine – creatures, to do my bidding and to be my jackals when I want to feed,” (Stoker 263). Dracula would suck the blood from helpless human beings for his reconstruction. Dracula’s motives were to gain power over other people. He did not have a heart, did not care

Open Document