Similarities Between Attack At Sea And Into Dark Water

1451 Words3 Pages

The selections, “Attack at Sea” and “Into Dark Water” both gave an illustration of the drastic occurrence on ships where lives of passengers were taken away; major people to these ships were partially responsible for some of these tragic deaths because of their illogical actions. The Titanic passage described millionaire and President of White Star, Bruce Ismay and the Lusitania passage introduced the captain, William Turner and their similar contact with the ships. Both of these men were placed in similar situations but executed them in a different manner. While they may have been presented with an alike problem, they ultimately had distant intentions during their experiences on the ship.
While Captain William Turner and J. Bruce Ismay attained …show more content…

To start off with, they were both large contributors to their ships. In fact, the article, “Into Dark Water”, says,“J. Bruce Ismay, president of the White Star Line, which owned the Titanic.”. Because White Star owned the Titanic and he was the president himself, it simply emphasizes that he was an important role to the Titanic ship. Turner was also one whom provided much involvement to the Lusitania ship as he was the captain. The text even highlights his importance as it states, “...Most experienced and respected captains employed by the Cunard Steamship Company, which owned and operated the Lusitania.” This focuses the point that he was undoubtedly a valued figure. All of these points conclusively are to show that these leaders share similarities in the position of their profession, placing them in an a relatable environment, leading it to be even more likely for them to make similar mistakes. For example, they did not follow the code of sea. Based on the selection, “Into Dark Water” written in the section, “The Coward of the Titanic”, it says that “Ismay was …show more content…

Overall, it is obvious to one’s eye that these men are much alike.
Captain William Turner and J. Bruce Ismay differ immensely. On one hand, Captain William was an honest man and admitted to his mistake. As said in the text, “He felt deep shame for having survived when so many had not.” This shows that he was apologetic about it because if one feels shame or guilt, it is known that they feel sorry. On the other hand, Ismay made the attempt the deny what he did. For a visual, the selection states,“Ismay swore that he helped women and children onto boats until moments before the sinking...But others, including Jack Thayer, said they saw Ismay forcing his way onto a boat...Later, these accusations were largely dismissed.” This proves that he explicitly lied because he claimed to help women and children but eventually he did not even create the urge

Open Document