Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The selections, “Attack at Sea” and “Into Dark Water” both gave an illustration of the drastic occurrence on ships where lives of passengers were taken away; major people to these ships were partially responsible for some of these tragic deaths because of their illogical actions. The Titanic passage described millionaire and President of White Star, Bruce Ismay and the Lusitania passage introduced the captain, William Turner and their similar contact with the ships. Both of these men were placed in similar situations but executed them in a different manner. While they may have been presented with an alike problem, they ultimately had distant intentions during their experiences on the ship.
While Captain William Turner and J. Bruce Ismay attained
…show more content…
To start off with, they were both large contributors to their ships. In fact, the article, “Into Dark Water”, says,“J. Bruce Ismay, president of the White Star Line, which owned the Titanic.”. Because White Star owned the Titanic and he was the president himself, it simply emphasizes that he was an important role to the Titanic ship. Turner was also one whom provided much involvement to the Lusitania ship as he was the captain. The text even highlights his importance as it states, “...Most experienced and respected captains employed by the Cunard Steamship Company, which owned and operated the Lusitania.” This focuses the point that he was undoubtedly a valued figure. All of these points conclusively are to show that these leaders share similarities in the position of their profession, placing them in an a relatable environment, leading it to be even more likely for them to make similar mistakes. For example, they did not follow the code of sea. Based on the selection, “Into Dark Water” written in the section, “The Coward of the Titanic”, it says that “Ismay was …show more content…
Overall, it is obvious to one’s eye that these men are much alike.
Captain William Turner and J. Bruce Ismay differ immensely. On one hand, Captain William was an honest man and admitted to his mistake. As said in the text, “He felt deep shame for having survived when so many had not.” This shows that he was apologetic about it because if one feels shame or guilt, it is known that they feel sorry. On the other hand, Ismay made the attempt the deny what he did. For a visual, the selection states,“Ismay swore that he helped women and children onto boats until moments before the sinking...But others, including Jack Thayer, said they saw Ismay forcing his way onto a boat...Later, these accusations were largely dismissed.” This proves that he explicitly lied because he claimed to help women and children but eventually he did not even create the urge
The speaker characterizes the Titanic as a “creature of cleaving wing” (17) in reference to its supposed inability to be sunken. The diction of “cleaving” (17) suggests that the speaker, at the time of the Titanic’s building, believes the Titanic to be able to sever through all obstacles. However, she immediately juxtaposes it with that “Immanent Will that stirs and urges everything” which “prepared a sinister mate” (18-19). By enjambing the two lines, the speaker foreshadows the surprise of the disaster. The “sinister mate” (19) alludes to the iceberg, while the “Immanent Will” (18) alludes to nature. The diction of calling nature the “Immanent Will” implies the speaker’s reverence and nature’s power. The speaker capitalizes the W and I since the “Immanent Will” is a specific entity, and also because the speaker realizes the power of nature. An immanent will suggests nature to be like an inherent testament, which cannot be overpowered or controlled. While the speaker will characterize the ship as “smart” (22) and growing in “stature, grace, and hue” (23), the speaker never capitalizes the word “ship” or any of the references to the ship. The speaker respects the Titanic by using words with positive connotations; ironically, she shows her greater reverence towards the “Iceberg” (24)
the tragedy of the Titanic. He cites these works, I feel, to support his own
The picture of the crewmen; Michael Moran, Dale Murphy, Alfred Pierre, Robert Shatford, david Sullivan and Frenky Billy Tyne Jr. on the Boat shows the viewer how they had to dress everyday to work and what they would have been wearing when the boat capsized and sank but the bodies were never found. This picture shows the imagery of how life as a fishermen would look like on the open seas. This also gives insight to how the ranking of the crewmen worked captian telling the fishermen what to do depending on the
Often when we think about the Titanic the first thought that comes to the mind is the film “Titanic” which was produced in 1997, 85 years after the disaster struck. It starred Kate Winslett (Rose DeWitt Bukater), Leonardo DiCaprio (Jack Dawson) And Billy Zane (Cal Hokley) as the main characters. The film is about a love triangle between the three main characters. This movie was produced by James Cameron who put enormous amount of research about the shipwreck of the titanic in order to depict the turn of events in his film. Amongst the purposes of his research he wanted to accurately depict the ship wreck itself from the very instant the ship hit the iceberg to the very last part of the ship that was subdued into the water. Another very significant part of Cameron’s research was to understand the socio-economic status of the passengers which will be discussed in detail later. Although historians have criticized certain aspects Cameron’s film the accuracy in which he depicts certain aspects such as the socio-economics of the passengers can’t be ignored.
The tragic history of the Titanic, the sinking of the “unsinkable” giant of a ship shocked the entire world and contributed to important shifts in the mass consciousness of the people who lived at that period and assessed the achievements of new technologies and their role. However, one would have been hardly able to predict in 1912 that this tragedy, no matter how significant and meaningful, would leave such a deep imprint on the history of human civilization. The continuing interest in the fate of the great vessel has taken the form of various narrations and given rise to numerous myths enveloping the true history and, in this way, often obscuring the facts related to the tragedy. In recent years, this interest has been emphasized by the dramatic discovery of the wreck and examination of its remains. The recovery of artifacts from the Titanic and the exploration of the site where it had sank stimulated new speculations on different issues of the failure to rescue the Titanic and the role of different factors contributing to the disaster. These issues have been traditionally in the focus of discussions that caused controversies and ambiguous interpretations of various facts. They also often overshadowed other parts of the disaster story that were confirmed by statistical data and revealed the impact of social realities. The social stratification of passengers that reflected the social realities of the period and its class interests determined the chances of survival, with most of those perished in the Titanic disaster having been lower class individuals.
...held him in the sea that swirled him out and safely over the boat to water in which he could touch. The surviving men were thankful to have survived, but learned that they really had no control over their lives. One of the most important lessons the correspondent took from the experience was, “… that “in the ignorance of the grave-edge” every man is in the same boat, which is not much more substantial than the ten-foot open dinghy on a rough sea” (Buitenhuis, web). Having survived the experience the cook, the correspondent, and the captain each believed that they could be interpreters for the sea. Crane gave each man a voice in “The Open Boat” that is uniquely theirs, but at the same time shared a common bond and struggle with nature for survival. It is up to each man (mankind) to find our own place in the universe and be open to the lessons that life can teach us.
The first reason that Ismay is responsible for the sinking of the Titanic is because, Ismay left the ship with women and children still on board. An article about J. Bruce Ismay and the Titanic says, " After the disaster Ismay was savaged by both American and British press for deserting the ship while woman and children were still on board." The article also says, “ Ismay told another story. He said he helped load eight lifeboats then when the deck looked clear jumped into an open spot. We obviously know there were 1500 people on the ship so it was by no means empty.” So if you were a child trying to get on a lifeboat what would you do? You probably would run around trying to find a life boat that was left still on the Titanic. Then
We have all heard about the Titanic. Either we have watched the romance movie or done our research in a different way. No matter where we get our information from we know the biggest parts of the tragedy. The ship Titanic crashed into an iceberg on a cold April night on the Atlantic Ocean while sailing its first trip. But haven’t you ever wanted to know more details about? Maybe how the people who were on it and survived? How could the situation be prevented? Couldn’t they have saved more people? Well in the book “A Night to Remember” it has details on the Titanic you have probably never thought of knowing. While reading the first chapter some parts really caught my attention. One was when people felt the jolt from the collision with the ice berg people didn’t suspect what tragedy was to come. A girl named Marguerite Frolicher, who was accompanying her father on a business trip, woke up with a jump since she was half asleep she was thinking about ‘little white lake ferries’ landing sloppily which made her laugh and thought to herself “Isn’t it funny…we’re landing!”. They really did...
In the poem “Shine and the Sinking of the Titanic”, Shine is a hero. Shine is considered a hero because he left the sinking ship Titanic and swam to shore in order to save his life from a forthcoming tragedy. In this poem, it is apparent that Shine was an employee of the Titanic crew. Shine was a very intelligent and wise man, he did not heed what the Captain, his boss, was telling him. Shine knew that something was wrong when he told the Captain that there was “forty feet of water in [the] boiler-room floor”.
The human voyage into life is basically feeble, vulnerable, uncontrollable. Since the crew on a dangerous sea without hope are depicted as "the babes of the sea", it can be inferred that we are likely to be ignorant strangers in the universe. In addition to the danger we face, we have to also overcome the new challenges of the waves in the daily life. These waves are "most wrongfully and barbarously abrupt and tall", requiring "a new leap, and a leap." Therefore, the incessant troubles arising from human conditions often bring about unpredictable crises as "shipwrecks are apropos of nothing." The tiny "open boat", which characters desperately cling to, signifies the weak, helpless, and vulnerable conditions of human life since it is deprived of other protection due to the shipwreck. The "open boat" also accentuates the "open suggestion of hopelessness" amid the wild waves of life. The crew of the boat perceive their precarious fate as "preposterous" and "absurd" so much so that they can feel the "tragic" aspect and "coldness of the water." At this point, the question of why they are forced to be "dragged away" and to "nibble the sacred cheese of life" raises a meaningful issue over life itself. This pessimistic view of life reflects the helpless human condition as well as the limitation of human life.
Hardy uses strong meaningful diction to convey his thoughts of the sinking of the Titanic. Words such as “vaingloriousness”, “opulent”, and “jewels in joy” illustrate Titanic for the reader so that he/she can picture the greatness of the ship. Phrases such as “Lie lightless, all their sparkles bleared and black and blind” describe what the Titanic looked after the sinking, loosing all of its great features. Hardy’s use of strong, describing diction depicts his view of the ship, before and after.
The story’s theme is related to the reader by the use of color imagery, cynicism, human brotherhood, and the terrible beauty and savagery of nature. The symbols used to impart this theme to the reader and range from the obvious to the subtle. The obvious symbols include the time from the sinking to arrival on shore as a voyage of self-discovery, the four survivors in the dinghy as a microcosm of society, the shark as nature’s random destroyer of life, the sky personified as mysterious and unfathomable and the sea as mundane and easily comprehended by humans. The more subtle symbols include the cigars as representative of the crew and survivors, the oiler as the required sacrifice to nature’s indifference, and the dying legionnaire as an example of how to face death for the correspondent.
Hardy makes a point to show the difference between the Titanic and the iceberg within the ocean. He shows this contrast when he states, “Steel chambers, late the pyres/ Of her salamandrine fires,/ Cold currents third, and turn to rhythmic tidal lyres,” (4-5). The harsh contrast between fire and cold are used to show chaos and panic of the ship as it was sinking as opposed to the bitter yet tranquil coldness of the ocean. Furthermore, contrast is used by Hardy when he says, “And as the smart ship grew/ In stature, grace, and hue,/ In shadowy silent distance grew the iceberg too” (22-24). These line portray the rise to fame and glory of the ever-amazing and
The sinking of the Titanic in 1914 became an international symbol to all. What that symbol is depends on each individual person that accesses the situation. Greed, chivalry, folly, bravery and progress are among the few symbols. Can someone who is over confident in the work they did with their own hands be cursed or were the crew members of the Titanic, weighing over forty-six tons, pure ignorant?
Symbolism was used to express the Captains minds set. In the beginning paragraphs, the Captain is viewed as depressed, apprehensive, and insecure. The Captain viewed the land as insecure, whereas the sea was stable. The Captain was secure with the sea, and wished he were more like it.