Shut Down The Alaskan Way Viaduct Essay

1682 Words4 Pages

In the late winter of 2005, the city of Seattle faced an urgent problem. The Alaskan Way Viaduct, an inner city elevated highway which carried over one hundred thousand cars and trucks every day, was beginning to show signs of structural failure. The 2001 Nisqually earthquake had put visible cracks into its concrete façade and it had started to sink further into the ground. On March 2, 2006, the Seattle Times ran a troubling editorial: “Shut Down the Viaduct,” read its headline. The article, written by several Seattle area geographers, actively lobbied for the Viaduct’s immediate closure: “The debate on these important decisions is ongoing, justifiably. Seattle's citizens will not be well-served if leaders fast-track the expensive tunnel alternative claiming urgency when all that needs to be done to eliminate the urgency is to close the Viaduct” (Miles, Montgomery, and Beyers 1). Seattle then decided to build a tunnel. Ten years later, the Alaskan …show more content…

In the city of Seattle, it runs along Elliott Bay and the city’s downtown and industrial districts. It was finished and opened to traffic in 1953. The construction of the Viaduct was itself filled with mishaps and delays. By the end of the project, the budget had doubled from its original five million dollar cost. Its opening solved little, too: “The over-budget, ugly Viaduct opened on April 4, 1953, at 1:40 p.m., purportedly to unsnarl traffic. The first traffic jam occurred 18 minutes later, requiring the intervention of police officers” (Holden 1). Business leaders and environmentalists in the Seattle have long lobbied for the Viaduct’s removal as it cuts off businesses and residents from the otherwise beautiful city waterfront. The tunnel seemed like the ideal solution; it would allow the waterfront and downtown to reconnect and allow for

Open Document