Should Juveniles Be Sentenced To Life Without Parole

744 Words2 Pages

In many cases, there are teenagers who are sentenced to life without parole because of a crime that they have committed. Usually these teens are misunderstood for something that they did not commit or just because they were the “accomplice” of the person who really did commit the crime. Juveniles should not be sentenced with life without parole, due to teenagers not knowing what they are doing most of the time. The impulsiveness of their undeveloped brain is usually the one responsible. These teens are usually undergoing different emotions and things that they cannot control. On the other hand, many people are convinced that juveniles that commit crimes don not deserve life without parole. They believe that teens are just plain idiotic and the things they do are wrong. Readers that are convinced with life without parole will see, that if they look deeper into these cases and not at what they have heard about these cases, the reader will see that teenagers are not always responsible of the crimes. The teen brain is one of the most important variables to teens being in jail to begin with. Researchers from the National Institute of Mental Health declares …show more content…

According to the article “Crime & Punishment”, Falcon was 15 when her and her friend went into a cab drunk. Her friends had a gun and shot the cab driver, who was dead in seconds. Rebecca was sentenced to life without parole and has been serving her life in prison since then. The court declared “Falcon guilty of murder, though it never sorted out precisely what happened” (Smith 3). The court did not look at the case, or what happened that day, but if they did they would have seen that Falcon did not fully commit the crime. It was Falcons friend who was carrying around the gun and since he did have the gun he was probably the one who shot the cab driver. Rebecca was sentenced to life without parole for something that she did not do, but for what her friend

Open Document