Short Essay On Freedom Of Speech

1210 Words3 Pages

In my work I am going to discuss the aspects of freedom of speech. Today, in the modern world of the law, one of the important factor is freedom of speech. Firstly, we will analyze what does a term - “freedom of speech” mean. It means, the right to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship, or societal sanction. The term “freedom of speech” is sometimes used as a synonym of “freedom of expression”. ,,The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 19 of the UDHR states that "everyone shall have the right …show more content…

This rights is highly protected by court. In my opinion the person is an individual, as he is a developed intellectual, created for freedom, needs air like a mouth to express his own opinion, and without it his life loses all meaning. Who will be a man if he refuses to freedom of speech, because of his personal privacy? He will be a slave who turns over the burden. The guarantee of personal safety is an excellent offer, but it is insignificant compared to freedom of speech. The exchange of opinions is a permanent and vital need. Hundreds of people died because of free speech. When the Czech reformer Jan Hus was burned in 1415, he said: "I do not see the choice between the denial and the kiss, I see only the truth and the lie." I am loyal to the truth until death. …show more content…

One family of theories attempts to justify a right of freedom of expression by pointing to various good consequences that such a right will bring about. The most frequent invoked good consequences of this sort that freedom of expression is supposed to produce are truth, autonomy, and virtue While some others analyzed the rights of free speech and press in lightof positive law, abolitionists insisted that the rights were God-given rights that state and federal constitutions secured but did not create.‘‘No,’’ said Gerrit Smith, ‘‘the constitution of my nation and state createnone of my rights. They do, at the most, but recognize what is not theirs to give. ’’. I take up these three consequentialist goods in turn. One common justification advanced on behalf of freedom of expression is that such freedom is instrumental to the discovery of truth. Freedom to disseminate new information and to criticize prevailing views is necessary for eliminating misconceptions of fact and

Open Document