Shooting An Elephant Quote Analysis

798 Words2 Pages

Without actions, thoughts are just seeds without water, destined to die. Even with water, a plant may never reach its fullest potential. A plant could become six inches instead of six feet, it all depends on the amount of water. The seed that gets all the water it deserves will blossom and may never die, while the same seed that gets no water might as well never exist. Using water, seeds are transformed into plants. Seeds have grown into democracy, equality, and all that is good and bad in the world. In the end, it is all about the water (actions) that transforms the seed (ideas) to the kind of plant (result) that it will grow into. The quote by John Ruskin, “What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. …show more content…

Only watering it can show its existence. In “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, the Orwell’s ambivalence towards his job and the people of India could not be seen externally because his actions did not show it. He enforces the English law, and that is what the Indians see. His frustrations remain nothing but a feeling because he does not act on those feelings. No one saw his opposition towards killing the elephant because his belief was just a seed in the ground. In the end, with no oppositional stance enacted , Orwell left no lasting effect during his time in India. Similarly, in 1984 by George Orwell, Winston hates the party and wants to see it destroyed. However, when he receives evidence that could undermine the party, he destroys the evidence. This contradictory response shows that even the strongest beliefs cannot invoke any results without action. “The Modest Proposal” shows the intention of an action is irrelevant when compared to the action itself. The essay is set up by stating it will make poor children an asset instead of a burden on Ireland. This idea itself could have flourished into the perfect plant, but that does not matter. The action proposed was to turn the poor children of Ireland into the equivalence of a pig and the elites of the country into cannibals. The innocent idea could not have offset the repercussions of the action because the idea is lost inside of the

Open Document