Sectional Tensions In 1860

1640 Words4 Pages

During the height of westward expansion and the ideas of ‘manifest destiny”, the United States began to gain a substantial amount of territory which did help increase the power of the young republic but also spark sectional tensions over slavery. These tensions would continue to be prevalent throughout the 1850’s as national politics kept debating the issue of the expansion of slavery. Acts such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Dred Scott Decision helped to increase sectional tensions even more. Eventually this all culminated in the Election of 1860 with a Republican victory, and a couple months later; states had began to secede due to conflicting societal differences. The argument can be made that the causation of the American Civil War …show more content…

A newspaper from the time, “The New Orleans Crescent”, spoke about the recent sectional tensions that were going on at the time. “The idle canvas prattle about northern conservatism may now be dismissed…a party founded on the single sentiment… of hatred of African slavery, is now the controlling power. No one can any longer be deluded … that the Black Republican party is a moderate party...it is in fact, essentially, a revolutionary party.” This again reinforces the idea that the South feels that their rights were being violated especially by the Republicans, who were composed of free-soilers and ex-Whigs from the North. The South would ultimately want to secede as if their political power was being strippped away, then they would not be able to have any form of power or representation. Therefore they felt that it was necessary to secede. A couple years ago, the Huffington Post posted up an article discussing the causes of the American Civil War and how states’ rights were intertwined with slavery. “Specifically, eleven southern states seceded from the Union in protest against federal legislation …show more content…

The idea of an agrarian society first came long during the early years of the United States as debates existed over the course of the young nation. Thomas Jefferson proposed an agricultural economy with independent workers and farmers while Alexander Hamilton proposed more industry. These two conflicting visions would go all the way up to the Civil War with the North and the South. The South chose to rely more on cotton agriculture which produced a lot of profit for them, but when sectional tensions, southerners were very worried. In an account from E.B. Heyward, a cotton planter from South Carolina, to a friend in Connecticut;he describes various economic troubles. “We have on hand about three millions Bales of Cotton and plenty to eat and clothe ourselves with, and what is most important our working population will have masters to take care of them and will not feel any pressure such as will soon come up on the operatives in the manufacturing States at the North...I have plenty of Beef & mutton to feed my family upon and I think I and all around me could stand hard times better than some of the rich abolitionists of your part of the World.” This is trying to show that the South depends on an agrarian economy to thrive and abolitionist movement threaten that as well as the election of Lincoln in 1860. Due to this fact, the South decided to

Open Document