Secret Survivors Analysis

840 Words2 Pages

Secret Survivors by Sue Blume is a paper uncovering the incest and it’s aftereffects in women. Throughout this paper, Blume makes some points that are very hypocritical and bias. She is a private therapist, social worker, and diplomat in social work, but she has never been a victim, and her opinions make for a worse argument. Example in Argument format: It happened to Elizabeth Barret Browning and to Bessie Smith, to name only a couple notables It happened to a president’s son, and to Lana Turner’s daughter Incest is not something that happens to “those people over there” the ones across town who don’t wash very often. It happens to all strata of society, at all economic levels, and in all ethnic groups. This argument is bias towards those …show more content…

Blume states “the very defenses that initially protect the incest survivor later lock these problems into place, interfering with adult functioning and preventing healing or change.” She is basically saying that the help you get after the incident will not help you as you grow older. Is she trying to help women or tell them they won’t get better? If someone is molested at a young age and gets help that means that help won’t transfer the rest of your life, I disagree. In the fourth paragraph I have found that it portrays a circular argument or logical fallacy. She beings that paragraph with “incest is the possibly the most crippling experience that a child can endure,” which is a conclusion, and the preceding sentences are premises that provide evidence for that beginning sentence. She went in a full circle to lead up to what she started …show more content…

She puts comments in the passage like, “if you are reading this and looking at your own life, you may be experiencing uneasiness and even sudden fear. She continues if you start to cry you might be in denial and been the victim of incest. This passage isn’t supposed to convince people that they were victims but try and help those who were actual victims and I don’t think Sue Blume does a very good job of it, she undermines those who are trying to help and kind of makes it seem as if their lives are over, and I don’t agree with

Open Document