We must first understand what the science budget is. It is split into two main categories: capital funding and resource funding. Capital funding is spent on building new scientific infrastructure to increase the productive capacity of the economy. Resource spending is in the running of facilities and to pay for the cost of research. Increasing the science budget thus would not only provide more funding for existing and future research projects but also improve the facilities and infrastructure available to scientists, allowing increased research quality. The breakdown of the current science budget can be seen in figure 3 below.
Figure 3: The science and research budget
Resource spending makes up a large proportion of the spend, which includes
…show more content…
A study carried out determined that increased government funding did lead to an increase in the number of articles published, but the effect on quality is harder to measure (Siow & Payne, 2000) The number of citations offers a reasonable metric to judge the impact of a research article. The study conducted showed little change in the number of citations received, suggesting no significant improvement in the quality of research. This creates a problem as if the increased science budget merely leads to more articles that do not influence production, then it will not boost flagging UK productivity …show more content…
The scientists who created the technology that helped lead to the creation of the internet could not have imagined the effect it would have on humanity for years to come. The advent of the internet boosted productivity beyond belief, but the financiers of the research wouldn't have known its impact. Therein lies the biggest problem with the statement proposed, how are governments to know what research will have the largest impact on productivity. The time lags associated with research and its eventual entry into the market or production process is very large, creating an additional problem as we do not know to what extent was the research the cause of the increased productivity.
Insofar as boosting productivity, increasing the science budget is a good idea as it will increase the human capital of labour in the economy and allow for improvements in the quality of capital. Any positive externalities generated are just the cherry on top. But all is not well, if increasing productivity was as easy as increasing the science budget, the government would have already done it. We must consider what effect raising government spending on R&D would do to existing private R&D
For centuries humans have depended on natural evolutionary processes for intelligence. Gathering information or doing simple research was a process that required large amounts of time and equipment until the proper information was found. Over the past several years we have seen how technology has advanced for the better of humanity. In “Get Smarter” by Jamais Cascio he brings to our attention some of the ways technology has benefited us today and how it could continue to benefit us in the future as well. The internet has become one of the largest breakthroughs in technology and become one of the most helpful tools created so far.
By increasing funds it would support cutting edge aeronautics and space technology innovations, education, and development that will help fuel the nation’s economy for years to come. In conclusion, NASA does not drain nearly as much money from the economy as it contributes, so the funding that goes to NASA is not all lost and should be seen as an investment.
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
In 2013 spending on NASA will be at the lowest point in the last four years because the United States government is in extreme debt. Many feel that this will lead to a halt on all space exploration and technological advancements in the world of Astronomy. In my opinion I feel that this lack of funding for NASA will thoroughly hinder progress for future generations as well as our own.
“NASA’s budget continues to be reduced from almost $18.5 billion in 2011 to $17.8 billion in 2012” (McBrien). With NASA expecting more budget cuts in the future, something
The question isn’t whether NASA should get more money, the question is what the company would do with it once the budget is increased. According to Leonard Richards, Laura Riggan, and Preston Martin, “it’s alright to fund NASA as long as the company is doing something worthwhile with the money.” Going to the moon and Mars is excellent, but that’s already been done. Time for something else. If NASA’s budget was increased, it could be
Although, like many projects, financial support is needed in order to provide the materials necessary for furthering our education. According to source C, only four cents of every dollar goes toward education, this needs to change. Space could help us solve challenges we face in our world today while overcoming unknown complications we may face in a new environment. Through space exploration we are putting money toward a "research and development, salaries, benefits, doctors, teachers, scientist’s… corporations and businesses both large and small. (Source A)" In fact, space satellites have inspired numerous scientists to find new ways to cut emissions while conserving energy, overall working to stop global warming and preserve the life of our world along with the human species. Funding is vital in order to expedite space exploration and provide our scientists with superior machines. Many do not realize this is not just a "silly research project,” it is a cause that not only benefit our generation, but many generations to
These are the reasons why I believe there should be more investment in space research and technology. It would be a time consuming and financially draining quest, but the pay off in new technology, applications, resources, and expansion opportunities make it a goal to strive for. As our rate of consumption of Earth’s natural resources continues to increase, it is imperative that we invest in the research of outer space as a possible solution to sustaining the human race.
Space exploration needs advancing scientific research, more machineries and equipments which means that it would cost us a lot of
According to Space.com the Federal Government approved a budget of $16.6 billion for NASA in 2014. Approximately 1/3 of that will be spent on space exploration.
From 2012 the budget was sitting dry at $17.8 billion dollars, as of October 2017 the budget will be announced at $19.5 billion dollars. Its definitely not the $109 billion dollars we wish to see for NASA but any addition is a great one. “The extra money means NASA has a better chance of pulling off its primary missions on schedule”(Verge 2016). The new budget also lead to a big jump for astronauts, considering how much money goes to Russian Soyuz rockets to send them into space. Roughly $80 million dollars per seat, but new budget means US rockets once again, “NASA scores a big win for its commercial crew program” (Verge 2016). Increasing budgets has also lead to great celebration due to the planned launch dates for rockets. On occasion rocket launches would move forward and eventually fall off the calendar due to constant delay, eventually leading a rocket to never make the build. NASA administrator Charles Bolden has argued frequently, “The first launches would ultimately slip into 2018 without enough money”(Verge 2016). Good news is NASA’s other major projects get big boosts as well. The Space Launch System (SLS) the expandable rocket NASA is constructing to take astronauts into interstellar space and on to Mars, it will be receiving “$2 billion, which is $300 million more than the program received for 2015”(Verge 2015). As NASA described this all “Its mostly good news all around”, Another great leap is the legislation set aside $175 million for a mission beyond Mars. Jupiters icy moon Europa would be the next stop in the solar system, “leading candidate for finding extraterrestrial life”(Verge 2016). The best part about this all, the bill directs NASA to do this all no later than
...fe, with the inventions they have produced and by learning what they have done I think the budget should be increased. I am a firm believer in that science holds the answers to our problems in the world. If NASA and other scientific organization continue their research I think issues and problems in the world will fix themselves. For example, if NASA or another organization finds a way to effectively convert salt contaminated water to fresh drinkable water, our problem regarding water shortage will subside. Maybe NASA found a way to have cars or some other found of transportation run on soil, sand, or grass (very unlikely but it is possible). NASA would need workers to build these devices, which would create many low education jobs across the country. Continued funding for NASA and other scientific organizations will fix the social injustice problems of the world.
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.
However, despite the long-term economic growth, technological progress is very important, and even if we...
In modern society, governments in both developed and developing countries contribute financial resources to various forms of research and development (R&D). This type of investment assists society to function more effectively, because of inventions and innovations in many sectors, such as health, education, technology and science. In this way, social growth is encouraged at both a national and international level, which further supports improved business and commercial expansion. Based on this, it can be understood that government funding promotes scientific exploration of new ideas and processes that can advance the standard of living around the world. Therefore, it is argued that government funding for research benefits society. This will be examined with reference to the way government funding for medical research aids society, and scientific production on technology.