Savings And Savings Crisis

1578 Words4 Pages

Savings and Loans Associations in the US, commonly known as thrift organisations, were originally intended to aid citizens in local communities purchase their own properties writes (Laughlin., 1991, p. 301). In order to achieve this, thrifts would accept savings from individuals and resultantly, make affordable low rate mortgage loans. Leading up to the 1980s, mortgage rates received, were viewed upon as the safest form of liability due to little credit risk involved. However, the Savings and Loans (S&L) crisis of the 1980s was concluded as one of the worst financial disasters of the twentieth century. The Federal Agency (Curry & Shibut, 1986, p. 29) recorded an estimated 1,100 S&L firms to be insolvent between 1980 and 1982, with the cost to the taxpayers nearing $200 billion estimate. The aim of this text is to provide a background into S&Ls, to establish the causes to the crisis including the concept of deposit insurance and its role in the disaster.
Founded in the mid-19th century, the S&L industry went under a notable transformation after the Great Depression, which had a particularly adverse effect on mortgage institutions, but notably on S&Ls. Home owners did not meet mortgage payments (Jarrow, 1995, p. 1107), and on the liability side, other depositors demanded access into their savings due to the fear for S&L failures. The introduction of Regulation Q (“Savings and Loan Crisis”, 2008) in 1933 called upon the Federal Reserve to employ the concept of price fixing. Banks interest rates to pay on deposits were set to a certain threshold and this power was extended to S&Ls in 1966. The initial reason it was thought for the Great Depression was due to high competition for deposit funds, causing the interest rates offered to b...

... middle of paper ...

...on the warning signals leading up to the 1980s. Deregulation of the thrift industry did not resolve the situation; in fact, it made the crisis become a disaster. Increasing the federal deposit insurance threshold from $40,000 to $100,000 meant thrifts could take on that additional risk, insinuating the moral hazard problem causing irrational behaviour. New laws implemented by the government meant they tried to resolve the crisis, making regulation of the industry tighter and forced thrifts to return to their original aim, to provide affordable home financing. The resolution to the crisis came in 1989 during the Bush Administration who demanded a huge bailout at the cost of the tax payers. The S&L crisis was branded as the one of the worst financial disasters to date, with many of the still solvent S&Ls being owned by bank holding companies instead of independency.

More about Savings And Savings Crisis

Open Document