Sakoku And Isolationism In Japan

1062 Words3 Pages

Japan was gripping with fear over thoughts of imperialism and colonialism. This distress caused deep seeded concerns among Japanese leaders, so they imposed a change within their foreign policy called isolationism. Sakoku, Japanese term for isolationism, would carry the nation for two hundred years because it was an attempt to protect the country from external threats like imperialism. The new approach was drastic, but they knew it was necessary to preserve and protect their nation. Japan adopted an isolation policy that was untraditional and it impacted their international relationships, therefore to fully understand the gravity and effectiveness of the policy one must look at its inception, method of execution, and long term effects.
During …show more content…

Sakoku influenced global relations in an untraditional sense, so in order to have a deeper understanding of the entire scope one must study the effects of the policy. The Author, Robert Hellyer, wrote an article addressing the impact this period had on Japan called Historical and Contemporary Perspective on the Sakoku Theme in Japanese Foreign Relations: 1600-2000. Hellyer points out how isolationism shaped the future beliefs and attitudes of Japan, moreover he blames the Sakoku period for their xenophobic mentality and political movements. Sakoku was an untraditional form of isolation because it was not true isolationism since Japan retained commercial and diplomatic relations with other countries. These external relationships kept the government informed of international events, hence they were dependent on these relationships and upon the information. This acquired knowledge influenced the political and economic structures of Japan, therefore Sakoku influenced and shaped future …show more content…

The Dutch East Indian Company traded with Japan and they were allowed to settle on a secluded island in Nagasaki Harbor called Deshima. The business relationship was strict with harsh rules and regulations because the Japanese arrogantly believed the trade relationship was a privilege for the Dutch, moreover the exchange enforced strict governing which forbid the practice of Christianity and the Dutch were confined to an island at all times. The relationship between Japan and the Netherlands seemed very one-sided which primarily benefited the Japanese as the Dutch tolerated harsh conditions and endless demands, therefore the trade exchange must have been extremely profitable and economically beneficial. Japanese rulers used these external relations as a networking tool to gain information, so again Japan demonstrates its untraditional isolation practices because they are not truly cut off from all worldly

Open Document