Ryan and Rojas: Compare and Contrast In a world of free information and easy-to-acquire resources, stealing another person’s work has become incredibly simple. This problem has taken several different forms over the years. Julie J.C.H Ryan shares her thoughts about a common type of information stealing in the essay “Student Plagiarism in an Online World”. Another article, “Bootleg Culture” by Pete Rojas, goes into detail about illegal copying in the music industry. Although these essays have several similarities, they also have many differences. There are a several similarities in the two articles. To begin with, Ryan and Rojas are both experts in their respective fields. As an associate professor who teaches Information Security Management, Ryan has dealt with many cases of plagiarism. Rojas also has had experience researching and writing about “bootlegging”, the …show more content…
Throughout her essay, Ryan presents many ways to stop plagiarists. She believes that plagiarism “denigrates grades, degrees, and even institutions.” Her stance is clear cut and to the point. Rojas, however, has a looser view of bootlegging. He believes that the world “should be embracing bootlegs” since “[they’re] part of the natural evolution of all things digital.” He claims that bootlegging has done no harm, but may actually be stimulating the music industry. This is vastly different from Ryan’s rigid point of view. Other differences exist as well. The structures of the articles also display the authors’ personalities. Parallel to the attributes of their opinions, Ryan’s writing style and layout is clear and concise, while Rojas’ is much more fluid and casual. “Student Plagiarism” has well-divided sections and headings, making it easy to read and navigate through. Rojas’ article on the other hand lacks clear segments. While this makes for a more casual style, it may cause difficulty to
Instead of giving facts about what he is arguing or simply stating his views on the topic, that music piracy is not stealing, he gives facts telling why it actually is stealing. This is contradicting to what he tries to prove and confuses the audience right at the beginning of his essay. In his concluding paragraph he uses a metaphor to attempt to make his point but, it turns out to be extremely puzzling. “Copywriting as we knew it in the twentieth century is doomed. It will still be able to thrash and writhe for a while yet in its death throes, and cause plenty of collateral damage in the lives of certain individuals, but it is ultimately dead meat” (Moore 249). The metaphor he uses is muddled because by trying to personify copyright it creates a cynical and different point than he is trying to make to end to his essay. Also, it does not tie into the introduction leaving the reader curious about how the opening and closing paragraph are related. The introduction gives all of these statistics of why music piracy is stealing. The closing paragraph gives a description of copywriting in the twentieth century is “doomed”. The two paragraphs are opposite from each other and do not make any sense to the points he is attempting to
In the case study “Pirates”, there is a debate of should copyrights been protected or not, or should illegal pirating been allowed? (Brusseau, 2012). One argument states that the copyright should be protected since it is an intellectual property. On the opposite, the argument argues that people who cloning the CDs may purchase the CDs themselves or given the original CDs by someone else, they own this property now, and they can do what they want with it.
McArdle argues that although music file-sharing is easily assessable and available in the millennium generation, free music file-sharing is causing damage to individuals involved in the music industry and in the entertainment industry. McArdle starts off the article by mentioning that record labels suffer the most financially in the year 2009. She also mentions that for the last decade, record labels business are experiencing decreases in revenues. McArdle criticizes the millennium generation for violating property rights of recording labels and the music industry. Moreover, McArdle points out that many young people in this millennium generation are the ones who are downloading music for free. She discusses how hard it was for people to look for music and to copy music in the past history compared to the present. She also points out that young people in the millennium generation do not see downloading music for free as a huge problem. She concludes her article by stating that perhaps music piracy is not such a negative trend. Although it affects individua...
While this student simply sat down and worked on her paper, the option to find a pre-made research paper was dangerously accessible to this time strapped student. However, it is these emotions that paper sites play up along with a general apathy towards plagiarism among students that make a stressed student deciding whether to plagiarize or not more inclined to go forward with the plagiaristic activity.
The better educated you are, the better off you are socially, and economically. Having a degree is, in general, a good indicator of your level of education. To get it some students study very hard. Others, on the contrary, prefer to take some shortcuts that seem to be easier for them. Those, not so much interested in acquiring a solid education, simply want to plagiarize to pass their classes, to get that degree. Plagiarism spreads out through any level of our education system. It even extends beyond that limit to reach almost any aspect of our society. With the internet revolution, this problem becomes more acute. “The web has provided global access to an unfathomable cornucopia of term papers, essays, and other scholarly works, right there out in the open for purchase or outright theft” (Simonson, Smaldino, & Zvacek, 2015, p. 160). This paper will discuss the different types of plagiarism. Before getting deeper into that discussion, we will start by explaining the word plagiarism.
Witherbee, Amy, and Marlanda English. “Music Piracy Costs Billions.” Points of View Reference Senter. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
However, Blum and Perez-Pena also differ in some of their main points. Both authors have different thoughts on who is responsible, the philosophy, and the solutions for the uprise of cheating. Susan Blum in her article argues that institutions have failed to encourage the regulations of academic integrity to the students. She explains to the readers that students should be taught the importance of academic citations, and how to avoid plagiarism. On the other hand, Perez-Pena believes that not only are institutions to blame for.
New York Times journalist, Trip Gabriel, puts into perspective students ability to use their creativity throughout their academic career in “Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age.” This article discusses issues of plagiarism in the digital age, especially through college students. There are different perspectives from various people either attending college or professors that argue why plagiarism occurs. Whether it’s because of laziness, unpreparedness going into college, originality, or authorship not taken into consideration. Overall, this article infers the different standpoints of plagiarism, demonstrating the ease the digital age gives students to plagiarize, and the importance
In the technological world we live in, where we’re only a click away from accessing the web, with billions and billions of searches to our question, plagiarizing has become easier than before. Plagiarism is the act of taking other people 's work and ideas without giving them credit. This can include any form of cheating. Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in the Digital Age, written by Trip Gabriel explores the misunderstanding of plagiarism by students. It also provide anecdotes and reasons given by different people to why students plagiarize without necessarily choosing a stand. Interestingly, it have been found that students still plagiarize knowing that it is wrong, which contradicts the idea that students misunderstand authorship. Authorship
They show their view of plagiarism clearly in their documents through the use of terms such as “without hesitation” and “will not be tolerated” (Student code of conduct and discipline, 2015, p. 6; 9. Academic Honesty, n.d.). Many college students try to find out the ways how to avoid being accused of committing a serious academic offence as much as they can. Putting their own name on someone else’s works and getting good grades, some of them might succeed cleverly, but it is nothing but dishonesty. Both colleges warn students the consequences of plagiarism strongly, saying it can bring negative
Thanks to the internet and the technological advancements of the modern era, information and entertainment come at the push of a button. While this is mostly beneficial to society because it aids in communication and work, it has also influenced the rise of a certain ethical issue (Bailey, pars. 5-6; Rasmus, par. 1). This ethical issue would be plagiarism. This is common with students in regards to literature. As an example, the Josephson Institute Center for Youth Ethics conducted a survey on over 23,000 American high school students in 2012. 32% of the students admitted to using the internet to plagiarize for their assignments (Josephson Institute, par. 3). Plagiarism also takes place in the field of art, which will be the main focus of this
Plagiarism is seen as a severe contravention of normal scholarly conduct, necessitating colleges and universities in the US and UK to establish eit...
Plagiarism, or the unaccredited use of another's work or ideas, has become more and more of a problem in recent times than it was in the past. According to statistics found in a survey conducted by the Free Press, 58% of high school students let someone copy their work in 1969, but by 1989 this number had risen to 97%. The expansion of the World Wide Web and the number of people accessing the Web on a regular basis has caused an epidemic of plagiarism in this country, especially among students. This is a serious problem that must be addressed because many students feel that if they are not getting in trouble for cheating, than it is okay.
Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement are two terms that mean different things yet are routinely mentioned as synonyms for each other. This is not the case. The underlying reasoning for people who choose to plagiarize and infringe on copyrights involve some of the same ethics and morals, but from a legal standpoint these terms mean different things. This paper will point out the similarities and differences between the two terms. It will first give some meaning and perspective behind each term then it will go into the details of what each term means. It will point out the types of plagiarism that routinely show in academia and what is covered under Copyright law protection. It will go on to compare and contrast the two concepts.
Today we face a serious problem which is Plagiarism and modern pirates. Plagiarism is the perform of occupying other’s ideas or work and showing the work off as one's own. The critical consequences of plagiarism of ideas and words are known by anyone with an academic background. Plagiarism is deemed academic misconduct and a violation of journalist ethics.