Roots And Ee Cummings Analysis

775 Words2 Pages

The definitions of good and being are similar because these two words define the best in people’s character.The three poets: Sonia Sanchez, The Roots and ee cummings prove throughout their poem that there is more than one meaning of being. Each of the poets defines “being” as a good thing because it defines a person’s worth. Sonia Sanchez, The Roots and ee cummings made it clear throughout their poems that there could be more than one meaning to these words by giving us different definitions. Being and Unbeing doesn’t have a certain definition because it’s based on the person's value. A person’s character and perspectives are not similar to others which is why these words have more than one meaning. Each poet may have a different definition of being, but they all have on definition in common for “being” be yourself. …show more content…

Throughout, his poems he gives us two different definitions. There might have been more than two meanings of being, but these two were the ones that stood out the most to me. As a person you have a choice to be yourself around others, or to be someone you’re not. Accepting who you are and being yourself makes you a better poet, according to Cummings. His idea of “being” is to accept who you are because you are the only person who can accept of who you are no one else. “Nobody else can be alive for you; nor can you be alive for anybody else” (19). Throughout Cummings poems he believes that “being” is harder than “unbeing” because there may be people out there that won’t accept of who you

Open Document