Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Speech on ronald reagan on challenger explosion
The history of the challenger space shuttle disaster
The history of the challenger space shuttle disaster
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Speech on ronald reagan on challenger explosion
President Reagan’s Challenger Disaster Speech Analysis This speech was made by our 40th President Ronald Reagan on January twenty-eighth, nineteen hundred eighty-six . Originally slated to be the State of the Union Address, President Reagan instead addressed the tragedy of the Challenger Space Shuttle that exploded mid-flight earlier that day. The seven-member crew perished in the explosion including Christa McAuliffe, who would have been the first teacher in space. In the twenty-five years of the United States space program’s history, this was the second time a space shuttle’s crew had been killed. The previous incident being nineteen years earlier, involving a cockpit fire in the Apollo I Shuttle cockpit killing all three the of the crew members aboard. …show more content…
In President Reagan’s speech, he made it a point to address the school children of America who were watching during class due to the importance of the first teacher to enter space. President Reagan tried to explain to the children about the costs of exploration and pioneering new frontiers. He told the audience that expanding man’s horizons and the future does not belong to the fainthearted but to those who show bravery. President Reagan promised that we, the people of the Unites States, would continue to follow the Challenger crew into the future. To begin his speech, he shared his and First Lady Nancy’s pain with the people of the United States as well as the families of the crew members. He praised the courage of the crew members and their dedication to their jobs. He stated that this was a tragic loss that our nation would mourn, but we as people could not fully understand the impact upon the families who lost loved
On January 28, 1986, Ronald Reagan, the President who takes on the grievances of America and establishes hope, in his inspiring speech entitled the “Speech on the Challenger Disaster,” is able to guide the United States to prosperity. He guides the United States. by emphasizing the courage and bravery of the Challenger crew, then he drives the focus to the good that NASA allows us to accomplish, and finally tells the people that the crew dies doing what they loved. Through Reagan's use of Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals, tone, and rhetorical devices, he is able to inspire hope in the people instead of the failure of NASA.
They’re where a lot of purposed recommendations from the commission to help ensure that any future shuttle missions would not experience the same catastrophic O-ring failure like the challenger shuttle. The first recommendation was to redesign the O-ring by improving “structural capability, seal redundancy, and thermal protection” (NASA, n/d). This change would also redesign the tang and clevis of the mating points of the rocket. The redesign not only used a third O-ring seal but also a newly redesigned “O-ring seals are designed to not leak under structural deflection of twice the expected values” (NASA, n/d)
Through this national address Reagan hopes to reach out to the public and encourage them to keep their faith firm in the American space progra...
Since the presidency of George Washington, the people of The United States have turned to the commander in chief in times of distress to receive assurance and hope. Kurt Ritter comments on President Reagan’s address to the nation given on January 28, 1986 saying, “Perhaps no president could have fulfilled the country’s need to mourn and, then, to begin to heal as skillfully as Ronald Reagan (Ritter, 3).” On that morning the space shuttle “Challenger” violently exploded while the nation watched live televised coverage of the shuttle’s launch. President Reagan was scheduled to give his State of the Union Address on that date, but instead he reached out the country in this time of mourning. He spoke from his oval office to heartbroken teachers, children, NASA Space Engineers, and the entire country. President Reagan’s reaction to the tragedy of the challenger guided the United States out of despair and into a new light of hope behind seven fallen heroes. In this essay I will show that Reagan gave our country a new light of hope through his emphasis on Pathos but also incorporating Ethos and Logos in this memorable presentation.
The Challenger disaster of 1986 was a shock felt around the country. During liftoff, the shuttle exploded, creating a fireball in the sky. The seven astronauts on board were killed and the shuttle was obliterated. Immediately after the catastrophe, blame was spread to various people who were in charge of creating the shuttle and the parts of the shuttle itself. The Presidential Commission was decisive in blaming the disaster on a faulty O-ring, used to connect the pieces of the craft. On the other hand, Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, in The Golem at Large, believe that blame cannot be isolated to any person or reason of failure. The authors prove that there are too many factors to decide concretely as to why the Challenger exploded. Collins and Pinch do believe that it was the organizational culture of NASA and Morton Thiokol that allowed the disaster. While NASA and Thiokol were deciding whether to launch, there was not a concrete reason to postpone the mission.
It was a freezing morning on January 28, 1986. Many spectators were waiting anxiously to witness the liftoff of the Challenger space shuttle’s 25th mission. These spectators included thousands of students because Christa McAuliffe was to be the first teacher in space. Tragically, only 73 seconds after liftoff, the Challenger split apart resulting in the death of all 7 members on board. There is evidence that NASA was aware of issues that could have potentially complicated the scheduled liftoff, but NASA fatally decided to proceed with the mission. Because of NASA’s negligence and the loss of 7 lives, the Challenger mission of January 1986 was one of the greatest failures of NASA.
During his inaugural address in 1961, President John F. Kennedy first promoted his plan to expand the United State’s space exploration program. A few months later, in May of the same year, Kennedy formally announced his desire to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade to a special joint session of the United States (U.S.) Congress. Then in September, Kennedy continued his promotion of this slowly forming goal at Rice University in Houston, Texas, where he spoke to a mixed group of professors, state leaders, scientists, and students of all ages. The main purpose of Kennedy’s speech was to rally more support for the growing National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) program in Houston, as well as its rapidly expanding budget,
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
Lind, Michael. "Why We Should Embrace the End of Human Spaceflight."Salon.com. N.p.: n.p., 2011. N. pag. Rpt. in NASA. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.
It is within man’s blood and nature to explore, and space is our next New World. Man’s first achievement in space travel was the launch of the Sputnik on October 4, 1957. For the next decades, space travel was roaring like a rocket, fueled by man’s desire to explore, man’s desire for knowledge, and man’s desire to beat his enemies. However, these impulses have died out as the well of government funding has been diverted to wars and debts, and the interest of the American people has been diverted to wars and debts. Amidst all these issues it is debated as to whether or not space travel is worth the money and the attention of scientists, particularly since humanity faces so many issues on earth currently. However, because of the past inventions, current services, and future benefits, space travel is indeed worth the money and attention of governments and people. It is within our hands to control man’s advancement, and space travel is the next venue to do so.
With the space program’s successes in space after the landing on the moon, much of the public saw space tourism was in the close future. As the shuttle program expanded in the early 1980s, NASA began a Space Flight Participant program to allow citizens without scientific or governmental roles to fly. In July 1985 NASA chose Christa McAuliffe as the first teacher and non-trained astronaut in space from 11,400 applicants. However, McAuliffe was killed ...
On January 28, 1986, the United States experienced a national disaster that will long be remembered as a dark day for our nation’s space program and for our nation in general. On its tenth flight, the Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds after take-off, killing all seven members on board. The spacecraft disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean. Americans had been eagerly anticipating watching the launch on live TV because one of the shuttle’s crew members was a school teacher. She would have been the first teacher to have traveled in space, so there was a lot of media covering the event. The Space Shuttle Challenger accident was such a tragedy that one study reported about 85 percent of Americans surveyed had heard the news within one hour (and this was even before the advent of social media and the internet). The Challenger disaster has been used as a case study in many discussions of safety in engineering. After nine successful missions, what went wrong on the Challenger’s 10th mission, and what has been learned from this accident from an engineering perspective to make space travel safer in the future?
Kennedy’s address at Rice University was written to inform and persuade the audience of America’s space efforts. His oration informed his citizens of their country’s decision to proceed further with its space program and furthermore, that it would “go to the moon” within “ this decade. “ He appealed
The words you are about to read are from a man far in the background of one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments; Putting a man on the moon. Everyone knows the outcome of the space race, but this story is a personal experience of a man, in the American workforce, who contributed to something more than just working to provide for his family, but for the American people, and ultimately people worldwide. This man, also happens to be my grandfather.
Since the beginning of time, mankind has sought after learning about and exploring the universe. This yearning drove us to achieve such great things as the journey to the moon and the discovery of water on mars. Nowadays, several people argue as to whether or not space exploration is worth the effort. I believe that it is humanity’s instinctual nature to pursue a better understanding of ourselves, and our universe. Further understanding of our universe will lead to the discovery of new technologies and ways to secure humanity’s survivability. As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity to our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed.