Contextual Analysis Ronald Reagan

1042 Words3 Pages

Contextual analysis is made up of three basic components; intended audience, setting and most importantly purpose. Authors often times consider and work each contextual piece into the construction of their given argument. An argument is not powerful if audience preference is not a main concern, if the setting isn’t taken into consideration, or if the purpose is not relevant to the current situation. On January 28th, 1986 the shuttle challenger exploded 73 seconds into its take off. President Ronald Reagan wrote a critical speech to address the tragedy that had struck our nation that day. It is highly evident in his address that kept audience, setting, and purpose in mind. He comforts a worried public using calm tone and simple yet effective …show more content…

Primarily he starts out his address by speaking directly to his audience, the American people. He states: “We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country. This is truly a national loss.” By doing so he establishes who his intended audience is, which is very important in a speech like this. It helps the audience feel a greater connection to the speaker since he is addressing them directly and relating to them. He uses very simplistic diction thought his speech so that it can be understood by the entire nation, ranging from the most educated of Americans to the young children. He even speaks directly to them in his speech by saying “… to the schoolchildren of America who were watching the live coverage of the shuttle's takeoff. I know it is hard to understand, but sometimes painful things like this happen.” He wanted to reach out to everyone about this tragedy; everyone in America was his intended audience. Another contextual factor is Regan’s purpose in giving this speech, he had three basic intentions. His first was to comfort the public, most people wanted to hear his take on the event since he was the president ergo making him the leader and the man to look up to in times of need. Regan did so by using gentle diction and even spoke in a very calming and relatable way. His second intention was to honor the men who lost their lives as well as their families. Reagan gave each one of the brave men recognition by mentioning each one of their names in the speech. This shows more respect rather than him just lumping them all together as the seven men, it shows he truly cares about and honors each and every individual man. By mentioning the families it also softens his image and shows that he is sympathetic making him easier to listen to and ultimately easier relate to. The more one relates to a person, the more they are likely to

Open Document