Roman Empire Fallacies

597 Words2 Pages

The fall of the Western Roman Empire was due to four major reasons, one of which was political. The emperors of Rome became so through inheritance or adoption, the vast majority of said emperors were terribly unfit to rule. This caused the empire to be very unstable as assassination and people revolting were commonplace, trust was hard to come by and long term or vaguely competent emperors were even more scarce. Inheriting or gaining the throne was incredibly dangerous as the Praetorian guards were often corrupt and would be paid to assassinate the emperor for more political and financial power, despite this short lasting terms there was no system put in place to substitute or exchange a dead emperor. Because of this instability, civil wars were thriving within the Western Roman Empire, due to their terrible living conditions, inflated taxes, and overall flimsiness of the government.
The Western Roman Empire was not void of economic fallacies either. Inflated taxes were also an economic issue. Since Rome stopped invading and conquering other lands; they also did not pillage any towns or cities, and so they had experienced some major inflation as their coins were being made smaller and smaller and the coins were valued based on how …show more content…

Since the Romans or any other society at the time for that matter had not known about ailments or cleanliness, many of the Romans had died of malaria, bubonic plague and lead poisoning as their pipes were made of lead, and they lived in very dense crowds and were not clean. The baths in the Roman Empire were a cesspool for spreading disease, thus anyone could go in them healthy or not, and so it was the opportune place to contract terrible ailments. This was such a problem that one of their invaders: Attila the Hun refused to actually invade the city of Rome, to avoid the

Open Document