Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How literature has changed over time
Theoretical perspectives of self reflection
Theoretical perspectives of self reflection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How literature has changed over time
“You must take personal responsibility. You cannot change the circumstances, the seasons, or the wind, but you can change yourself. That is something you have charge of.” ~Jim Rohn
“To be a good citizen, it’s important to be able to put yourself in other people’s shoes and see the big picture. If everything you see is rooted in your own identity, that becomes difficult or even impossible.” ~Eli Pariser
“Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” ~Mahatma Gandhi
Little John (formerly John Little) was a character in The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood that had changed drastically from how he was in the beginning of the novel by seeing
…show more content…
Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” ~Marcus Aurelius. Different perspectives on anything can lead to the huge misunderstandings that can lead to wars, such as the American Revolution, or smaller conflicts such as the Sheriff and Robin’s constant clashes, which lead to change in Little John. When he and Robin fought at the bridge (Pyle 13; Ch. 1), it was only because each thought that they were the better man, but if they had only looked past their pride and stepped into the other’s shoes, then that little skirmish would’ve never taken place, and Robin wouldn’t’ve gained his right-hand man in such a violent way, or maybe he wouldn’t’ve gained a right-hand man at all. Next, when Robin takes Little John to the Nottingham Fair, he joins the Sheriff under the name of Reynold Greenleaf in exchange for a peaceful life, as he thought he would be happier that way, but eventually he decides to go back the Sherwood Forest, and he rejoins Robin Hood, much to his delight (88; Ch. 6). Different perspectives changed Little John’s view of the constant battle against society, and he realized that he couldn’t truly have an even remotely peaceful life until the conflict between the Sheriff and Robin Hood was resolved even if it meant going out of his way to help an old
“Non-violence is a powerful and just weapon without cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
Conflict is constant. It is everywhere. It exists within one’s own mind, different desires fighting for dominance. It exists outside in nature, different animals fighting for the limited resources available, and it exists in human society, in the courts. It can occur subtly, making small changes that do not register consciously, and it can occur directly and violently, the use of pure strength, whether physical, social, economic, or academic, to assert dominance and achieve one’s goals; this is the use of force. Yet, with the use of force, the user of force is destined to be one day felled by it. “He who lives by the sword will die by the sword.”
...fists can be uneffective in a war minded society. If an aggressor is attacking with no opposition, one cannot rely on the morality of the aggressors to halt the attack. Intervention of the attacks would be impermissible by the standards of absolute pacifism, as it would contribute to the overall amount of violence. The absolute pacifist would become a martyr for their beliefs, and without opposing the aggressive force societies would be annihilated. I believe while pacifism is morally better than war in terms of the amount of violence projected, and diplomatic negotiation should be the main solution to world issues, it is a commonality of society that war can potentially be the quickest solution to stop an aggressor. Although the notion of a Just War is unattainable, the causes of war as described in the theory set a standard for global leaders to promote justice.
The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton proves the point that violence can be justified if necessary. To inflict change in their lives people often fight with violence instead of peace to evoke change. The world strives for change everyday whether or not you like it. How the people create a change in society whether they use peace or war, it is up to them to decide how to modify our ever changing world. Violence and fight between the Socs and Greasers tells us that both can be justified if it inflicts positive change in society. ‘
The legend of Robin Hood includes a group of so called outlaws, and how they go about fighting and cooperating with the others in their land. Along with the death of his father, Robin left his home after it was burned down to go and live in the woods. There, he assembled an army of loyal men to help him fight against unjust laws and actions in return for shelter, food, and camaraderie. Although considered outlaws, Robin Hood and his men clearly show actions of the Knightly Code, such as: defending the weak and helpless, fighting only in just causes, and dealing honorably with opponents in battle.
There is a considerable debate about the precise meaning of nonviolence. Some people believe that nonviolence is a philosophy and strategy for social change that rejects the use of violence. In other words, nonviolence is a method for resolving a conflict without the use of physical power nor enmity towards opponents. Instead, it emphasizes you to look beyond convictions and one’s urge for victory, it is the motto behind the saying “hate the sin and not the sinner”. For others it is a way of living and an essential part of their values and norms, for those people, nonviolence is the road which will lead them towards attaining inner piece and moral satisfaction. “Learn and teach nonviolence as a way of life; reflect it in attitude, speech and action” say’s Gerber in his article The Road to Nonviolence. Thus making nonviolence the ultimate behavior towards achieving truthful, spiritual, loving life. Mahatma Gandhi, the nonviolence guru, defines nonviolence as “a power which can be wielded equally by all-children, young men and women or grown-up people, provided they have a living faith in the God of Love and have therefore equal love for all mankind”. (mkgandhi.org) Therefore we understand that nonviolence has some terms and conditions to be met; living faith in God, truthfulness, humility, tolerance, loving kindness, honesty and the willingness to sacrifice. ...
Summary: In the chapter "How Little John Lived at the Sheriff's" from the book The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood, by Howard Pyle, Little John (disguised as Reynold Greenleaf) goes to live at the Sheriff's after accepting to join his service. During his stay, Little John became a favorite of the Sheriff's, allowing him to enjoy feasting on rich dishes, superior alcohol, and sleeping late. Six months later, growing fat and sluggish, Little John stays in bed instead of going hunting with the Sheriff and there he begins to reminisce about his merry life in Sherwood Forest among his fellow merry men and Robin Hood. Little John decides that after breakfast, he will leave and go back to his fellow friends. As he approached
He stole from his people through taxes and it was for his own personal gain. Instead of calling the King out on this, they only called Robin Hood out. Robin Hood only stole because the King was stealing from his people. He gave back what the King took. If the King wasn’t being greedy, Robin Hood would have had no reason to steal.
The final option Robin has is to not form a merger or an alliance with the Barons. Robin may not want to take the risk that is associated with the baron’s proposition. He may want to explore other strategic options to overcome Prince John and the Sheriff. Although there is a high return (future amnesty) for Robin and the Merrymen’s services, there is also a high risk associated with this venture. Robin knows this and has to make a decision on what he thinks is best for the Merrymen.
Response: Good question. Robin and the Merrymen's mission had started out as a personal vendetta against the Sheriff. It seems to me that in order for him to achieve that goal he must embrace a larger goal. This isn't all that unusual. We come across this all the time in business. A private inventor develops a new product that's really good. He starts a company and owns 100% of it. He does this to maintain control.
There are several issues Robin Hood needs to consider. First, Robin Hood needs to make sure his own personal grievances against the Sheriff do not cloud his vision and what is in the best interest of his Merrymen as a group. Second, take a broad look at the overall organizational structure by conducting an environmental scan, a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis and/or using a variety of organizational assessments (measurements). A SWOT analysis will help determine some strategic alternatives and how the band can attempt to fulfill its mission and achieve its goals. Robin Hood can use the SWOT analysis to identify where he is strong and vulnerable, where he should defend and attack by scanning both internal and external environments (McNamara, Performance Management, 1999).
...tain aspects of it that explain the world. Prince John represents the person in the world who’s only goal is to make it to the top, no matter who they step on along the way. On the other hand, Robin Hood is the do-gooder type who focuses on helping people and not being selfish.
Robin Hood and his Band of Merry Men had a successful first year. With new recruits pouring in from the furthest outreaches of England, Robin had met his objective of strengthening in number. Although he was satisfied with the size of the organization, he has realized necessary preparations had not been made to accommodate the now over abundance of members of his organization. Many challenges now face Robin such as a lack of provisions and lack of funds to support the band, but he cannot lose focus of their original foundation of "Robbing from the rich and giving to the poor". In addition they have to stay focused on their long term goal to remove Prince John from power by freeing King Richard from his imprisonment in Austria. Robin Hood has to form structure within his organization so that it can continue to grow and prosper.
The legend of Robin Hood did not start how you know it these days, in fact Robin Hood did not have a Female companion until the early 1500’s, in fact some early readings suggest that Robin Hood was homosexual. In all of Robin Hood stories he is always around his sidekick Little John, as the historians say the Robin Hood tale was a historic event around 700 years ago. The tale orbits around the relationship of two real life characters, Sir William Neville, the constable of Nottingham castle, and Sir John Clanvowe, a poet. Historians suggest that these two were so close together that they might have been homosexual due the their intense friendship and how much they cared for each other. Out of all Robin Hood’s outlaws Little John is the one that is never missing in any story (Clanvowe). The soldiers who fought in the 100 year war, including Robin Hood could be considered gay, because they were at war for so many years without any women around them and the bonds that these men created over the years are ...
Robin then left for many years, only to come back and discover that his father had been murdered and that the new leader of Nottingham was the Sheriff. Not only was this a great shock to Robin, but all the people of the land were suffering greatly from the Sheriffs corrupt rule. He was very money hungry and greedy, and the lower class community suffered greatly from his greediness. Robin Hood had many different traits that are quite obvious in the story and the movie.