River Catchment Management

632 Words2 Pages

River catchment management has three aims which determine if the management plans are of good quality or not. These aims are to keep the river flowing, to maintain good water quality and to sustain biodiversity. In Mtunzini, the sources of the Amanzimnyama and Siyaya Rivers have been impacted on by plantations of Eucalyptus also known as Blue Gums and Sugar cane respectively. Before Confluence, both rivers travel through an area of rehabilitated dune forest which was part of Ian Garland’s catchment management strategies to improve the quality if the rivers. The Siyaya Estuary was damaged by floods in 2012 and this has caused the estuary mouth to close and deteriorated the water quality.

In a study of the Siyaya Estuary done in 2006, by Nicolette T. Demetriades entitled; Determination of the Preliminary Ecological Reserve on a Rapid Level for the Siyaya Estuary (Source 1), it is proven that the Siyaya Estuary is impacted on by sugarcane cultivation and thus reduces the quality of the water within the estuary. This research paper was done to determine if the Siyaya Estuary is still classified as an estuary once the river mouth was blocked from the ocean and the causes of said blockade. This report was done in collaboration with the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and Marine & Estuarine Research, which makes the report reliable and valid source. This report is valuable as the results provide a comparison for the hypothesis that the Siyaya Estuary is in its current state of degradation due to poor catchment management. However this report was done to prove whether or not the estuary is indeed an estuary. A limitation which is posed in this research is that a flood caused the Siyaya River to burst over the dunes in...

... middle of paper ...

...eport also documents all the research which has been scheduled for the area as well as the researchers who are planned to come in. This report also provides some suggestions as to how the river can be rehabilitated. This is source is valid and reliable to some degree because it is written by Ian Garland himself, and he has seen all the changes in the area but as he is a conservationist and because he has an attachment to the area, this report will contain bias. The element of bias can also be a limitation because the report was done to highlight the state of degradation that the rivers were in. This information is valuable to proving the hypothesis regarding the relationship between catchment management plans and the present state of the Siyaya Estuary as it allows a comparison to take place to compare the descriptions of the rivers to the present day conditions.

Open Document