Rhetorical Analysis: Richmond P. Hobson Argues For Prohibition

1436 Words3 Pages

“Richmond P. Hobson Argues for Prohibition” Rhetorical Analysis The temperance movement was an important event in the United States, which was active from 1820 to 1966. The goal of the movement was the “moderation” and “complete abstinence” from the alcoholic drinks (“Temperance Movement”). At that time, a lot of conflicts were associated with alcoholism. A majority of prohibitionists (supporters of the temperance movement) had formed in this time period, so most of the prohibitionists had intense feelings to enact temperance. The religion was widely regarded as the catalyst of the temperance movement. During the 1820s to 1830s, the religion had gained popularity in the United States. As a result, the requests for prohibition have grown (“Prohibition”). The religion like Christian criticized alcoholism …show more content…

According to “The Bible,” the inebriation was a lethal sin. Besides that, the alcoholism also caused divorces, which Christians thought as a betrayal to God. Various people involved in the movement, including many women, Al Capone, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt (“Prohibition”). In the 1900s, most women were suffering abuse from their husbands because alcohol had exacerbated their husbands’ anger. Once the temperance movement started, the women embraced it. After the prohibition law had been enforced, the needs for liquors grew, which led to high illegal activity rate. During this time period, Al Capone was believed to be responsible for a series of crimes. Near the end of the temperance movement, President Roosevelt liked to enjoy a Martini, so naturally he disagreed with the movement. In “Richmond P. Hobson Argues for Prohibition,” Hobson explores the idea of the temperance movement most notably in his use of parallelism and catalogue in order to convince the representatives in the

Open Document