Rhetorical Analysis Of Obama's Speech By Mr. Obama

1109 Words3 Pages

The speech given by Mr. President Deals with the consequences of violent actions and it raises questions of morality. It is an attempt to guide the American people through their hard times and motivating them. In his opening lines Obama shows his grief for the victims of the shooting stating: ‘I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.’ In this quote Obama position himself with his people, showing his sympathy and comforts them by saying ‘I will be here for you.’ Obama uses religious references multiple times in his speech, referring to Scripture as source of deliberation. He said, the scripter tells us: ‘There is a river whose streams make glad the city …show more content…

‘We mourn with you for the fallen. We join you in your grief’. He also draws parallels between the nations mourning following the shooting and the mourning that comes with losing a family member, thereby implying that all Americans are a family. This strengthens an overall intention of the speech: together the Americans in their time of mourning. The overall tone of the speech is very serious and dignified, which is natural given the circumstances. This is not a light speech that should contain humor, but is a serious and important link in a healing process. Obama’s choice of language is very intelligent and wise, thereby also making him trust invoking, as he presents himself as a capable and knowing president, but at the same time it is understandable to the masses–an important factor when addressing an entire nation, not all of which …show more content…

He is comforting and empathetic, but at the same time he is the president; the most powerful man in America, someone wiser who can give advice. He soothes and insures his nation that questioning and reacting is natural‘… when a tragedy like this strikes, it is part of our nature to demand explanations - to try to impose some order on the chaos, and make sense out of that which seems senseless.’ but at the same time, what should come from this reaction is not given, and here is where he plays the important part of an educator. He tells the story of the victims, explaining their characteristics and backgrounds. This functions as a strong narrative tool as the verbal representation of Gabrielle, Christina, Judge John Roll and the remaining victims makes them seem real and relatable, they could have been your neighbor or beloved family member, which only makes the shooting and their death seem more meaningless and cruel. Gifford becomes the image of one of the pillars of the American constitution–freedom of speech and self-government –‘shattered by a gunman’s bullets.’ The 9 year old Christina is the embodiment of a good, studious girl, an image of all the good that comes with the innocence and naivety of childhood. As a listener you experience her unspoiled image of the world; a 9 year child is unlikely to possess the same experiences and knowledge that sometimes foster hatred in adults, to her the world is

Open Document