Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The function of rhetoric
Barack obamas speech analysis
Barack obamas speech analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The function of rhetoric
Devin Plemons
English 1010
Dr. K. Rivers
16 October 2014
Gun Control: To Save A Life Writers use rhetoric to communicate their specific point of view or argument in a speech or text. A reader analyzes the writer’s use of rhetoric to evaluate the effectiveness of the given argument or point of view. In his “Interfaith Prayer Vigil Address,” President Barack Obama argues the need for more restricted gun control by using emotional appeals to compassion and paternalism, collective diction, and structure, which reflect the influence of a school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. In his speech given on December 16, 2012, President Barack Obama addresses the massacre that happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. During the
…show more content…
The structure of a speech is how it is organized. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation, the structure of his speech is organized into three parts: a sincere opening, the main point, and then a sincere closing. In the opening of his speech, President Obama offers condolences and is sincere to the situation at hand. As he progresses in his speech, he reaches his main point of the need for a more restricted gun control policy. In the body of his speech, he loses some sincerity and focuses on the present situation and how to resolve the issue. Then, he closes his speech the way he began it, by being sincere and reaching out to the ones who were suffering. This particular way of organizing his speech was effective in supporting his argument. By opening his speech in a sincere way, he caught the attention of anyone listening because of his kind words. After he had their attention, he addressed the need to come together as a nation and end the awful violence. Then he ended by offering comfort to families. This specific structure buries the more controversial topic of gun control which causes people to feel more sympathetic making them more willing to listen to his message even if they support the right to bear …show more content…
President Barack Obama was successful in reaching his intended audience by his use of rhetorical elements. Following the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, President Obama addressed the need to reduce gun violence with the help of the nation and later began proposals to do just that. “Keeping with President Obama’s commitment to engage the American people in the process, the Vice President solicited input from citizens and organizations… [and] spoke with many groups about their ideas on curbing gun violence in the United States” (Now). After speaking to many people and a number of propositions, Obama set forth a plan on January 16, 2013, just a month after his address in Newtown, Connecticut, to protect children and communities from gun violence. “No single law – or even set of laws – can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society, but that can’t be an excuse for inaction. If there’s even one step we can take to save another child or another parent or another town then surely we have an obligation to try”
In the Obama Sandy Hook School Shooting speech, the exigence that Obama talked about was the tragedy of the school shooting. In the speech, he talks about how he is reacting as a parent and not as a president. Obama also talks about how the children had their life ahead of them. He basically said the children were going to become something in life; some were going to get married, and some were going t...
...o engage in destructive rhetoric are held to task, rhetoric cannot simply be attributed to some state of affairs, while the rhetorician from whose lips the rhetoric emerges is held to no ethical standard. Certainly it is conceivable that rhetoric can have destructive consequences. Rhetoric seems to have played a central role in the deterioration of people’s faith in their systems of government, or the electoral process by which they choose their representatives. A view of rhetoric in which the rhetorician is accountable for the effects of the change they inflict upon the world could lead to less destructive rhetoric and a society which operates on the solid ground of personal responsibility.
Obama’s argument starts off very formal and informative. He begins his Newtown Interfaith Prayer Vigil by addressing what had happened that fateful day and acknowledging those who were courageous. He appeals to the audiences mournful emotions by first addressing the people of Newtown, “They lost their lives in a school that could have been any school; in a quiet town full of good and decent people that could be any town in America”. Here, he is not only creating a dramatic effect with the use of a semicolon, he also connects the people of Newtown to the Nation. With his use of connecting terms such as “any school” and “any town” he is including the people at home watching and bringing their attention to the fact that this really could have happened to anyone, they just hadn’t noticed. That dramatic pause also He then goes on to appeal to
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.
"Inaugural Address by President Barack Obama." The White House. The White House, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014. .
Remarks by President Obama at the eulogy for the honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney; A man who was killed when an another man rushed into a church in South Carolina and killed 9 people while they were immersed in an afternoon mass. President Obama created different appeals and feelings through the use of different Rhetorical Devices such as Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. The use of logos ethos and pathos help the president convey his central idea which is to ensure the people of South Carolina and the people of the United States that not only are they safe, but they will unite to take this opportunity to create a more united U.S. This will happen through the establishment of new gun reforms.
In the story, What is Rhetoric by William Covino and David Jolliffe, there are a wide variety of topics discussed that are inextricably interwoven with the concept “rhetoric.” Rhetoric, as defined by the authors, is “the study and practice of shaping content.” Consequently, my first thought was: Ok, this is a rather broad and opaque description; my successive thought, however, was one of astonishment, inasmuch as the authors went on to further elucidated this jargon. In doing so, the authors distilled the most crucial elements of what is rhetoric— the prevalence of discourse community, and how appealing language is often a precursor to persuasion.
The author’s main argument in “Rhetoric: Making Sense of Human Interaction and Meaning-Making” is that rhetoric does not need to be complicated if writers incorporate certain elements to their writing. Downs further analyzed the elements that contribute to rhetoric such as symbols and signals, motivation, emotion, ecology, reasoning and identification. The author emphasized that writers can learn how to deliver their writing effectively once they are more aware on how rhetoric works. Downs constantly assures that rhetoric is quite simple and does not need to provoke fuzziness. Even though the term rhetorical is applied to everything, the author of the article made it clear that the “rhetorical” thing is situated. The example provided by the author in this article, further guides our understanding on what rhetoric
In response to the many shootings that have transpired, Barack Obama has been discussing how to prevent them. He claims that signing an action will protect the people from gun violence. Furthermore, he believes that this action will hinder guns from getting into the hands of the men, women, and children that abuse them. In his speech, “Remarks on Signing 23 Executive Actions to Reduce Gun Violence”, Barack Obama applies pathos, logos, and biased language to lure the audience into feeling that the 23 actions are deemed necessary in order to protect those they love.
Gun violence is a serious issue in today’s world that is continuing to grow more dangerous. Everyone perceives the issue differently but President Barrack Obama has an exceptional view in which he exemplifies the importance of keeping our nation’s people safe. President Obama speaks to the entire nation in his “Remarks on common-sense gun safety reform” providing thought provoking concepts involving gun violence. Throughout Obama’s speech, he states how he believes in the Second Amendment but contrastingly believes the accessibility of guns needs to be more selective, in order to prevent guns from getting into the wrong hands. Obama conveys this message by using a variety of rhetorical elements, most noticeably logos, pathos, and repetition. In President Obama’s
In the past week, between an emotional speech at the White House and a town hall on CNN, President Obama laid the groundwork for new executive action on gun violence. Accusing congressional Republicans of blocking gun reforms, Obama told those gathered in the East Room that something had to be done. "Until we have the Congress that's in line with the majority of Americans," he said, "there are actions within my legal authority that we can take to help reduce gun violence and save more lives."
Clark (2016) suggests that rhetoric isn’t limited to oral communication, but currently has a permanent foothold in written works: magazine or newspaper excerpts, novels, and scientific reports. Not only written
Rhetoric is, in my understanding, the art of persuading an audience by adapting your argument and the way you present it to an audience, time, place, and any given situation. There a few components in a presentation which, when understood and taken advantage of, can increase the impact of the argument, or so I think. In this post, I'll attempt to discuss what those components are, and how they work in giving a powerful speech using the art of rhetoric.
Rhetoric is the art of effective speaking or writing, and persuasion. Most people use rhetoric numerous of times in their everyday life without their concern or knowing.
What he meant by Americans in his speech was referring to all the citizen who have lost their loved ones and the victims of gun violence and was referring to the citizens to take a step. American also refers to the struggles or how the citizen cope with the aftermath of gun violence. This brings to the second theme and that was gun violence. The entire speech was on gun violence, but it was not just focusing on the mass gun shootings that had taken place throughout the Unites States. When President Obama talked or referred to gun violence he meant the lives that are lost through the use of guns, such as suicide, domestic violence, or even accidental shooting. As stated before, Obama talked how 300,000 American died each year by guns. By using these numerical examples, he was trying to explain how these innocent lives could have been saved. In his speech he also included that the United States of America was prone to violence compared to the other countries and gun related incited came along so frequently that we as a whole are not doing anything to change