Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

965 Words2 Pages

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” is a direct rebuttal to a letter titled “A Call For Unity” by several religious leaders of the south. These leaders attacked the necessity and intent behind Dr. King’s peaceful Birmingham protests. In the letter, King argues that direct action is needed in Birmingham and that peaceful protests are important in order to make change. King states, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” which supports his argument that he cannot be complacent to the mistreatment of black people in Birmingham. Dr. Martin Luther King successfully validates his point by providing evidence of mistreatment for blacks in Birmingham, establishing and defending his character, and evoking a sense …show more content…

This allows the audience to consciously reflect on their connections and complicity with injustice while simultaneously humanizing the movement. This successfully destroys “outsider” claims and helps strengthen his reason for protest. Furthermore, there was no denying the black people in Birmingham were in need of immediate action. King states: Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of police brutality is known in every section of the country. Its unjust treatment of the Negroes in the courts is a notorious reality. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. King uses non-debatable facts about the state of Birmingham to emphasize the need for change. These facts are unchangeable and help stress that the problem is there. Evidence such as statistics, records, and news regarding racial inequality in Birmingham emphasizes how significant the problem is. This evidence helps King reinforce the need for protests. Overall, King uses an abundance of literary devices in his letter in order to advocate for injustice. One of the most common, are …show more content…

The “I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.’ King is arguing that his “extremism” is very similar to the “extremism” of the Bible. Key figures such as Jesus were seen as extremists and Christianity is a direct result of that. The ability to name multiple of these “extreme” figures shows that change comes from the extreme. Additionally, what is seen as extreme today, can be influential tomorrow. Biblical references weren’t the only type of references used to convey a point. King also referenced the infamous philosopher, Socrates. King expressed: Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, we must see the need of having nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men to rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. King references Socrates, which builds logos, ethos and enhances the argument, as Socrates is a trusted philosopher in history. The quote exhibits that tension is necessary and an important part of the justice

Open Document