Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges in employee retention
Challenges in employee retention
Challenges in employee retention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges in employee retention
Bratton and Gold (2003) describe a reward system as “The combination of extrinsic and intrinsic rewards delivered by the employer. It also consists of the incorporated policies, processes, performs and administrative processes for executing the system within the framework of the human resources (HR) strategy and the total organizational system”. There are basically two types of rewards. Those are as follows: a) Extrinsic Rewards b) Intrinsic Rewards Extrinsic rewards are the financial intensives the employees are given for their performance. Which are: Bonuses Salary Increments Gifts Commissions Target Bonus Profit Share Intrinsic rewards are the non-financial rewards given to employees for their performance. Those are as …show more content…
d) Supporting flexibility, by responding to changing organizational skill and performance requirements. Components of the reward system: There are three broad reward components can be identified within the reward system. a) Direct or base pay: a fixed salary or wages that constitutes a standard rate for the job, as defined by market pricing and job evaluation. This amount is paid at intervals of a week or month and reflects hours or work: the amount of time spent at the workplace or on the job. It is appropriate as a basic pay component in jobs where outputs are less meaningful or measurable. It also provides a relatively consistent and predictable basic income. Pay progression may be related to age or length of service, or to performance – related criteria such as competence or skill attainment. The key advantage of direct pay are that it is easy to implement and administer; it is generally felt to be fair and it helps to establish mutual commitment in the employment relationship Effectiveness of Direct Pay: • Direct payments were highly effective at RFL & ACI. • Payments provide significant contributions to the incomes of local …show more content…
ii) Performance related pay (PRP), offering additional payments for individual or team performance according to a range of possible performance criteria. iii) Organization performance pay, based on the profitability of the firm: example value added schemes, profit sharing schemes and employee shareholding. Effectiveness of Performance: Variable pay is the most effective methods to increase employee motivation and increase their productivity through overtime payment, payment with best performance and profit sharing as organizational growth. c) Indirect pay or benefits: non-cash items or services. These may include deferred pay in the form of pension contributions, legal entitlements. For example, to sick pay, maternity pay, paternity leave and annual leave and so-called fringe benefits such as company cars, housing assistance, medical insurance and allowances. Effectiveness of Indirect Pay: Indirect pay make the employee more loyal and it’s motivate to them as well as they are getting extra facilities by the company to improve their personal life as
Financial rewards given on regular bases include bonuses, gain-sharing, and so on and are tied to an employee’s accomplishments and are distanced from salary. The reward does not emphasize competency but rather excellence or achievement. They are separate from merit pay increases because they are usually an increase due to inflation with some additional percentages for competent employees.
According to Dreher and Dougherty most current pay systems are not related to performance but only to circumstances and skills and competencies: ‘Most pay structures can be labelled job based pay (…). Some firms introduced a new pay system toward a skill- or competency based pay. In these systems employees are given pay increases as they acquire additional skills or competencies, not as they move to a job in a higher pay range’ .
...e company’s overall strategy before determining the compensation structure. The way an organisation uses compensation can drive an organisation in specific directions (Noe et al, 2003). Therefore, great thought should go into deciding what type of compensation structure to use in terms of the whole organisations strategy and the chosen method should contribute to furthering the overall objectives of the organisation (Sherman and Bohlander, 1992). E.g., individual incentives will not fit into an organisation that wants to further a team-based approach to work (ibid). Compensation sends a message about what an organisation feels is important and the types of activities it encourages (Sherman and Bohlander, 1992). Compensation tailoring is an integral method of maintaining the budget (ibid). For this reason, many companies resort to retrenchments in economic downturns (Venter, 2003). An organisations compensation program determines the type of employees that it will attract as well as either increase or decrease the applicant pool (Sherman and Bohlander, 1992).
An organisations internal pay structure can affect the way employees perform to the business strategy. A workers performance not only depends on the pay level they receive (Solow, 1979, in Alexopoulos & Cohen, 2003), but also takes into consideration their pay compared to workers above and below them, those within the same group, and the external labour market (Akerlof and Yellen, 1990). Pfeffer (2005) argues wage compression, the act of reducing the size of the pay differences among employees, improves productivity. To gain competitive advantage, organisations need to acknowledge not only hierarchical wage compression (between management and employees) but also the differences between individuals at similar levels. Narrowing pay discrepancies promotes a sense of community and a common fate, leading to greater efficiency by diminishing interpersonal competition and increasing collaboration (Pfeffer, 2005). Pay compression thus advocates equity theory; if internal factors and external competitiveness are aligned, employees perceive their pay to...
This type of work offered workers few intrinsic rewards, therefore extrinsic rewards were often the only motivational tools available to organizations (Thomas, 2009). Furthermore, extrinsic rewards alone are not sustainable; if you withdraw the reward, the motivation disappears (D 'Ausilio, 2008). Additionally, it hurts intrinsic motivation because rewarding people for doing something removes their innate desire to do it on their own (D’Ausilio, 2008). Today, as stated by Thomas (2009), extrinsic rewards are less important, as day-to-day motivation is strongly driven by intrinsic rewards. According to D 'Ausilio (2008), a Gallup Poll surveyed the top ten employee motivators and listed number one was public praise/recognition. Not having employee motivation can cost an organization dearly. As surveyed by Gallup, according to D’Ausilio (2008), actively disengaged workers cost employers $292- $355 billion per year. Armed with these facts, I would look to intrinsic rewards as a main reward system for employee motivation, mixing in some extrinsic as well. As summarized by D’Ausilio (2008), the two should be combined into a complimentary system to promote
The theoretical rationale for performance related pay can be explained in the ‘principal- agent moral hazard’ theory. The idea can be explained by assuming that employees have discretion over the level of effort they provide, and that they can choose between minimise and maximise their effort. The employer cannot observe effort directly over employee's decision either to provide low or high efforts. The idea behind this theory also stated if employer offers a fixed wage, then employees will choose to minimise their effors. The employer could make a decision by reducing the wage until it matches the value of the low effort level, but this may not always be desirable for...
Since organization success depends on both customers’ satisfaction (outsource) and increase employees’ productivity and commitment (internal source), today companies attempt to attract improving employees’ performance by using various flexible incentive pay programs. Careful design of incentive pays program and rules of administration are crucial to the effective management of an organization.
For an instance, a sales executive is rewarded if that person has achieved a certain number of volumes of sales. This is more like the concept “Profit Sharing”. However, more senior executives are rewarded based on the overall performance of the company rather than based on their contributions. For an instance a CEO will get a huge bonus if a company meets its profit targets for the year. In both cases, employees get motivated to achieve these objectives and receive the employee compensation they are entitled for. This automatically creates a decisive and a dramatic increase of effectiveness and efficiency of the
Some employers expect the incentives in pay-for-performance plans will motivate employees to increase productivity. However, as employees focus on increased quantity, quality may suffer (Joseph, 2011, para. 2). For example, a salesperson may focus making as many sales as possible and fail to complete paperwork accurately, thereby causing customer service issues. Another disadvantage is that studies have found that when incentives are used to motivate workers, may “reduce intrinsic motivation and ethical beliefs…such as fairness” (Paton, 2009, para. 5). Many individuals, who have an inherent need to do their work well, lose their motivation and enjoyment in their work. Another disadvantage of a pay-for-performance plan is the loss of teamwork among workers. Those who are trying to meet their incentive goals may refuse to assist co-workers, which may escalate into conflict among employees (Joseph, 2011, para. 3). Additionally, performance standards may not be specific enough for an employee to understand exactly what is expected; therefore, it may be difficult to determine if an incentive goal has been met. Finally, if employees believe the incentive amount is too low, they may not try to meet production goals. Furthermore, they may resent their employer for establishing a pay plan that will not allow them to earn enough to support their family. As a result, workers
Employers are often faced with the challenge of looking for ways to boost productivity and profitability while at the same time, motivating employees to accomplish organizational goals. For many employers, variable pay plans have risen to meet this challenge. A variable pay plan ties pay increases to increased performance and productivity. One of the more popular group variable pay plans is called gain sharing. Under gain sharing pay programs, both the employer and the employee benefit from increased productivity. Therefore, gain sharing has often been referred to as a win-win pay program since it is an incentive strategy that ties pay to productivity. Gain sharing is a type of incentive plan designed to increase productivity by linking pay directly to specific improvements in a company’s performance. Gain sharing is used primarily when quantitative levels of production are important measures of business success. Gains are shared with unit/department employees on a monthly, quarterly, semiannual or annual basis according to some predetermined formula calculated on the value of gains of production over labor and other costs. The plan lets employees reap some of the rewards of their efforts through teamwork and cooperation and by working smarter and harder.
According to the person saying this phrase, a reward system is the world’s greatest management principal. If the organization rewards a certain kind of employee behaviour, good or bad, that is what the company will get more of. Every existing company has some form of reward system, whether it is outspoken or not, it exists. People correspond positively to praise, and praise in the right moment creates loyalty and affinity. Rewards come in two different types it can either be in form of incentive motivation or personal growth motivation. The former is the kind that comes from within the individual, a feeling, being proud over something, feeling content and happy by something that you have done. The current system is developed by Ford and has been used in Comapny since the takeover. The compensation program includes both fixed and incentive elements. The fixed part is given as a base salary. Furthermore the incentive program is divided into two parts, the first one is called; Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, aimed to reward the short-term performance and achievement of annual goals that are set a year in advance and the second is the Long-Term Incentive Program
There are a variety of advantages to person focused pay plans. Providing employees with job enrichment and job security. They become motivated through job enrichment, because this model allows for more intrinsic rewards for the employee by creating an interesting work environment. The employee’s also see a positive correlation between the new skills they are learning and being rewarded continuing their education. Increased employee commitment is an advantage of a person focused pay plan. This is an advantage, because with increased job motivation, and high employee
Hendry (1994) define reward stragey as an important element in the stragtegic approach to HRM for different reasons. Firstly, it is the basic mechanism by which employers aim to elicit effort and performance. Secondly, the actual payment system may demand adjustment to develop motivation. Thirdly, it is frequently the fundamental part of the employer’s financial strategy . The efficiency of any organization is related to the level of payments and benefits that the organization offer, it literaly affects the relationships at work. Thus, the firms need to develop pay systems that are convenient for them , that provide value for money and that reward employees fairly according to the work they perform to avoid inequity and conflict. Reward management includes a set of tensions and paradoxes. For employers , reward is considered as a cost but to the employees , it is seen as their only source of
The total pay package has a direct impact on the successful recruitment, selection and the retention of staff within any organization. This pay package is critical for any business to remain competitive in today’s business world. Competitive compensation packages are vital to both large and small organizations as they encourage the retention of talented staff.
To effectively subsist in the contemporary world , Companies have embraced the total rewards system and made it part of human resource management practice with small and big organizations employing it to enhance their competitiveness in the local and global markets. First introduced in 2000, the total reward theory shows the vibrant relationships that employers have with their employees. However, "WorldatWork - Total Rewards ModelTotal Rewards Model SVG Graphic",( 2016) states that ; this concept has developed to describe means through which employers and employees benefit from each other as well as how external and global business environment influence the productivity , retention and engagement at work .