Reintroduction of the Death Penalty in the UK

722 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast the arguments for and against capital punishment

Reintroduction of the Death Penalty in the UK

How would you feel if a mad man killed someone you loved? Would you

want revenge? For many people the answer to this would be yes. But how

far are you prepared to go? Capital punishment is a very controversial

issue discussed by many. There are many reasons for crime such as drug

addictions, mental health problems, unpleasant childhood, peer

pressure and with all the violence shown on TV some people think that

murder is acceptable in society. We cannot automatically assume

society is not to blame for some of the causes so should we give

second chances or just turn our backs on the accused by condemning

them to death?

Some people would chose the first option insisting that it breeches

human rights by taking a life and then killing will become the norm

for society. People will think that if the government can murder why

can't I? Capital punishment does not deter crime and if anything

increases the chances of crime. In the USA the top 13 states with the

highest murder rates all have the death penalty. If it is a crime to

commit murder then the court is also committing a crime by murdering.

They government cannot have one rule for the general public and

another set for themselves.

Another issue is that you can nearly never be sure whether the victim

is innocent. How could you live with yourself knowing that you had

killed an innocent victim? You have then committed the same crime as

the one you thought was serious enough to be executed for. In the USA

alone 117 people have been released from death row, some only minutes

away from execution, in light of new evidence. Once someone is dead

you cannot change it. In Texas a death penalty case costs 2.3 million

dollars whereas imprisoning someone on their own in a maximum security

cell costs three times less, while in Florida it costs 51 million

dollars more to execute people.

Even the police don't believe in the death penalty and they say that

Show More
Related

  • Reintroducing the Death Sentence in Britain

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    want to end up dead. I think this is a good way of using the death

    Read More

  • The Abolition of Capital Punishment in Australia

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since the last execution in Australia in 1967 of Ronald Ryan and the abolition of capital punishment in Australia in 1973 imprisonment has been the only option as a sanction for murder. A survey conducted in 2009 demonstrated that a clear majority of Australians (64%) believed that imprisonment should be the punishment for murder as opposed to 23% stating the death penalty should be used and 13% did not wish to comment. The death penalty is not an effective punishment for all cases and there has not been any solid evidence stating that it is a more effective deterrent than imprisonment. Furthermore capital punishment possesses the risk of executing the innocent, which has happened or almost happened numerous times in the past such as Colin Ross. The death penalty is also a breach of the Universal Human Rights. Additionally although there is belief that detaining criminals actually costs taxpayers more due to court processes, the method of execution and many other factors. While imprisonment should be the highest sanction for crime, in some cases this is not effective, such as the case of Australian serial killer Peter Dupas. As a result, imprisonment is the only appropriate option for murder in majority of instances, however in some cases it is evident that capital punishment is necessary for the safety of society.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of A Call To Action By Jimmy Carter

    1777 Words  | 4 Pages

    Additionally, the problem with legal killing is that it doesn't actually lower the murder rate. Not only that, capital punishments are costly and ineffective. The death penalty actually correlates with making people more violent and accepting of violence. Many countries have now outlawed the execution of human beings but the United States still keeps it around. Carter even talked about how China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United States account for more than ninety percent of executions worldwide.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty in the United States

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    The sentence for murder appears to be getting less severe as time passes. Crime is rampant and out of control. There must be a system to prevent these people from committing such grievous acts (Balanced Politics). Time spent in jail often is a means of stopping a few; but much more is needed in order to prevent recidivism. In some court cases a wide range of punishments that would cut the rate of crime should be available to prosecutors and judges (Balanced Politics). A judge could sentence a person to life in prison; but the criminal justice system may set this very same person free after ten or fifteen years in prison. Why must we put our trust in a judicial system that will let these vicious offenders out in society after ten or fifteen years in prison (Death Penalty). The judge may impose a life sent...

    Read More

  • Is the Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States should use the death penalty because it is economical and continues to be a deterrent for potential offenders. Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights mean so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Essay

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Audience relevance: The United States is one Nation and that we believe that if you commit any crime you must be punished. If you commit a crime than you should be punish not murder. The death penalty is not a punishment. Also the Death Penalty is costing many of us money without even knowing.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty Must Be Abolished

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe that there is a standard when it comes to morality. The basics of that standard includes knowing that murder, rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, larceny, and perjury are wrong. What does it mean for something to be wrong? It means that the majority of human beings can argue that those crimes hurt rather than benefit individuals or a society as a whole. The death penalty can be implemented for any of the crimes listed above when a judge believes that the crime is serious enough. However, the death penalty uses one of the crimes itself; murder. If the government uses the death penalty as a punishment in order to show that murder is wrong, how can they murder and assume it is right? Opponents of this statement could argue that the government has a judicial system in order to uphold the moral code within our society, and that the death penalty honors human dignity by allowing the defendant to control his own destiny. However, I argue that the death penalty objectifies and takes away the humanity of the defendant.

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Capital Punishment

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that capital punishment is being used for vengeance or as a deterrent. Capital punishment has been used worldwide, not only by the governments to instill fear, but to show that there are repercussions to ones actions. From the time we are born, we are taught to learn the difference between right and wrong. It is ingrained in our brains, what happens to people that do bad things? Capital punishment is renowned for being the worst thing that could be brought amongst ones life.

    Read More

  • Speech In Favor Capital Punishment

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Speech In Favour Of Capital Punishment Capital Punishment is the lawful infliction of death and has been used in Britain since the 5th century. It was not until 1964 that capital punishment was abolished and this has been described by many historians as Britain's worst decision in over 500 years. Along with these historians, I also believe that our country was much better off with the death penalty as a punishment for sick and twisted people, murderers, rapists and peadophiles. Did you know for instance that in 2003 there were 1048 murders and 172 attributed to one man? . . Harold Shipman.

    Read More

  • We Need the Death Penalty

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    In our society there are many criminals that get away with no punishment for their crimes. Some of these people are walking around our cities with no remorse and waiting to strike again. When you walk down the street and you see a man walking on the opposite direction, you probably don’t think that he could be a cold blooded killer and if someone asks you right this minute if you are pro or con death penalty the answer would most likely be con. Now think about this, imagine that your brother, sister, mom, dad, or anyone you love walks down that same street and comes across this man and you never see that love one again. Some ten days later the police comes to your door telling you that they have found that loved one face down in a muddy bog, having been beaten to death, or perhaps shot or stabbed, or maybe strangle. Perhaps the person you love has been raped, mutilated, or made to suffer greatly before dying. If this were to ever happen to you or someone close to you, would you want that to happen to someone else? Would you allow a cold blooded killer to walk the streets your little brother, sister, son or daughter walks on? I certainly wouldn’t. For this and other reasons is that death penalty should be kept and enforced.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Justified

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that under certain circumstances that capital punishment should be allowed because if someone is going to commit mass murder they should pay with the ultimate human right which is of their life. This topic has been widely thought of in the world with a few philosophers really encompassing my views. Those are the views of Ernest Van Den Haag and Bruce Fein. Philosophers who oppose our views are such like Justice William Brennan and Hugo Adam Bedau. I will prove my point using the ideas of deterrence and morality of the issue of capital punishment. If the government would show that if you kill someone there will be a consequence for their actions and that the consequence would be equal to what they have done. The population will see that it isn’t worth taking another humans life. If we were to kill people that are committing these mass killings of innocent people there would not be as many criminals around. Therefore the streets would be a place people wouldn’t be afraid of anymore.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Change

    319 Words  | 1 Pages

    I intend to focus on approving the change in the death penalty in a way where it is enforced, and for it could be more cost effective. One way the change will benefit society is that can allow families to sleep at night knowing they had justice. Having the absence of capital punishment is synonymous with the crime rate increase, we must put a stop to criminals who might strike again. There are instances where criminals (such and serial killers) have been sentenced to life imprisonment escape from captivity and wind up in society surrounded by hundreds of innocent people where they continue to commit their heinous crimes. Having this change would make it so that the crime rate is reduce, for example, capital crimes( rape, treason, murder, terrorism,

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Essay: Benefits of the Death Penalty

    2127 Words  | 5 Pages

    Crime is everywhere. Wherever we look, we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the darkness of our society? No, definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we cannot ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole bread from a grocery store, definitely does not deserve death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people for fun or for his personal gain, definitely deserves death penalty. Death penalty should continue in order to eliminate the garbage of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support death penalty because of several reasons. Firstly, I believe that death penalty serves as a deterrent and helps in reducing crime. Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence. Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals. Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Should be Abolished

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, many believe capital punishment should be reinstated in the United Kingdom because of the financial cost of prisoners. Annually, it costs about £26,978 per prisoner when they are in jail . If a criminal is sentenced to life in jail, then the cost of their imprisonment would be many times this. In the USA, the average cost per prisoner annually in jail is $29,000 . The cost of the drugs used for the lethal injection is believed to be $86.08 . This is far less than the cost of keeping a prisoner in jail, and would save the government money that could be used to try and make the community a better and safer place.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty Does NOT Reduce Crime

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today's system of capital punishment tolerates many inequalities and injustices. The common arguments for the death penalty are filled with holes. Imposing the death penalty is expensive and time consuming. Each year billions of dollars are spent to sentence criminals to death. Perhaps the most frequently raised argument against capital punishment is that of its cost. Other thoughts on the death penalty are to turn criminals away from committing violent acts. A just argument against the death penalty would be that sentencing an individual to death prevents future crimes by other individuals. However, criminals are not afraid of the death penalty. The chance of a criminal being sentenced to death is very slim. The number of inmates actually put to death is far less than it was decades ago. This decrease in number shows that the death penalty is faulty. With that being true, many criminals feel that they can get away with a crime and go unpunished. Also, the less that the death sentence is invoked, the more conflicting it becomes when it is actually used. Alternative can be found to substitute for the death penalty. A huge misconception of the death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping inmates imprisoned for long periods of time. Ironically, the cost of the death penalty is far greater than the cost of housing a criminal for life. Appeals on the death penalty become a long, drawn-out and very expensive process. There are those who cry that we, the taxpayers, shouldn't have to "support" condemned people for an entire lifetime in prison-that we should simply "eliminate" them and save ourselves time and money. The truth is that the cost of state killing is up to three times the cost of lifetime imprisonment (Long 80). ...

    Read More

More about Reintroduction of the Death Penalty in the UK

Open Document