More handpicked essays just for you.
Painting comparison essay
Analysis of "The School of Athens" painting by Raphael
Raphael during the italian renaissance essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The School of Athens, painted in 1509 by Raphael, and the Last Supper, painted in 1495 by Leonardo, are both vastly different although they were both commissioned for sacred spaces. The most striking difference between the two is the subject matter. There are also some similarities between the two. There are many differences that can be found between the two artworks. School of Athens is found in the Raphael Rooms in the Vatican. It depicts well-known philosophers together in the courtyard of a school. The central figures in this artwork are Aristotle and Plato, each representing what they believe with their hand gestures.The light is natural light. Statues of Athena, disguised in Minerva, her Roman goddess appearance, and Apollo are in the background. Last Supper is in the refectory of the monastery of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. Most of the figures in School of Athens are barefeet. The scene is of the last meal that Jesus had with his apostles before his crucifixion. The central figure is Jesus who is reaching for the wine and bread. The source of the light is in the middle, highlighting Jesus and casting a shadow on the apostles near the edge of the artwork. Most of the figures in the Last Supper also have a halo which …show more content…
They are both frescos commissioned for a sacred space. The figures within both frescos mostly face the audience. The most important figures in each are also right in the middle. School of Athens and Last Supper both have figures who seem like they are arguing or debating about something. All the figures in the artworks have a different features making them more realistic. Many figures have distinct features that help identify them, and some figures are holding something as a symbol that is related to them. Some also share the same color for clothing as well. Most of the figures are facing other figures or the main figure like they are talking and listening among
Baptist, were both written by the same artist. The actual name of this artist is Dominikos Theotokopoulos, but some people prefer to call him El Greco, which in translation simply means “The Greek.” Both paintings were written by El Greco towards the end of his life, and both are of important religious figures in Christian religion-one of St. Francis and the other of St. John. Both are similar in style and composition, and both were written in practically the same time period, approximately only five years apart. St. Francis was written at about 1595 and St. John at about 1600.
...done. Giotto used tempera to paint this one. There are senses of desperation of the apostles, but it is not as compelling or moving as Leonardo’s. Giotto has bright colors, especially considering the era it was painted in. However, he doesn’t use landscape, there is no symmetry. When you look at it, you can tell who Christ is due to the golden halo around his head. However to decipher which one of the apostles is Judas, would be in vain. He used no symbolism, there is no depth. The background is done in a golden hue, not a natural life like version. The faces of the apostles do show a questioning gaze, but the diverse emotions are not there. Everyone is also sitting straight up around a table, there is no movement. I would have to say that while for its era this was a great painting, it is not a memorable one for me. Leonardo’s version is so much more.
We find that, in conclusion, that these pieces are very similar in many ways. They are both originally created in the same style and time period. They are Hellenistic and dramatic, although in their own, individualistic way. Each sculpture was created in different mediums and have different stories. These are both very individualistic pieces of Greco/Roman sculpture that has influenced many artists throughout time and will
During the Renaissance, people were dedicated to studying human works. They would observe from real life to gain inspiration, new ideas, and to try to recreate the world as they saw it in their art. New techniques such as scientific and atmospheric perspective were created, changing art forever. Artists would use their skills to create works for patrons, from the Church, various guilds, and other religious orders. During the High Renaissance, Julius II commissioned Raphael to decorate the Vatican Palace. The first of the rooms he decorated was The “Room of the Signature”, where he painted The School of Athens. Originally, this room housed Julius II’s personal library, but later on it would be the room where papal documents were signed. In 1508, Raphael began painting four frescoes that represented theology, philosophy, law, and the arts. As stated in Janson’s History of Art Volume II, This fresco “represents a summation of High Renaissance humanism, for it attempts to represent the unity of knowledge in one grand scheme.” Raphael’s The School of Athens is a prime example of humanistic art, as evidenced by the subject of the art itself, the classical elements in the piece, and it’s scientific and illusionistic rendering.
They also had the use of perspective and many times real people and settings were represented. Examples of these Renaissance paintings would be Sandro Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, Raphael’s School of Athens, and Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper. The Birth of Venus is a good example of humanism as the focus is Venus, the Roman goddess of love and Venus is standing contrapposto in the middle of the painting. The School of Athens is another perfect example as Greco-Roman architecture is prominent and the sculptures are painted in the contrapposto stance. The Last Supper expresses the idea that any individual had unlimited potential. Leonardo also uses facial expressions of the people to show who Christ
One can learn a great deal about fourteenth century art by observing and analyzing the subjects ,the central and main focus of the art works at this period.The main subject religion ,in particular Christianity was flourishing in Europe at this time . Christianity was the central and dominate power politically and religiously.Political leaders ruled under a theocratic government.Every aspect of life revolved around religion;Education domestic,and social.Any work of art paintings or architectural,communicates these historical significance in fourteenth century Europe.Before man learned to write they learned how To draw and make art so it's only natural they recorded their history through means of art.The altarpiece triptych series by one of Giotto's pupil .which illustrates significant stages in the life of Christ,shows how centered Christianity was in fourteenth century Europe.
Art, by definition, is “something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings”. Throughout history, one way that art has been used is to reflect a multitude of ideas and beliefs. Christian beliefs and ideas have been portrayed in artwork since the beginning of Christianity, although, it was not always acceptable to do so. The idea of the final judgement is a Christian idea that has been displayed in art repeatedly in a variety of ways. Michelangelo’s fresco the Last Judgment (1536-1541) is a piece that visualizes this idea. Since the time it was finished, this significant piece found in the Sistine Chapel has been continuously critiqued and analyzed. Many Christians struggle to interpret the event of a final judgment after reading it through Scripture. In analyzing Michelangelo’s piece, it is similar difficult to determine what he exactly meant to portray and what the various part of his masterpiece represent exactly. Many have examined this piece and made different regarding what exactly the various figures and objects are supposed to represent. The diverse interpretations of this work further shows the idea that when Christian ideas are reflected through artwork, it is hard to ascertain exactly what an artist intended to demonstrate. In addition, the controversies surrounding this piece represent the idea that when Christian ideas are revealed through art, there is potential for disagreement regarding what should and should not be included in Christian art. Michelangelo’s Last Judgment is just an example of what results when Christianity is brought into art.
In regards to subject matter, both pieces of sculpture are of leaders, Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II were the pharaoh and queen of Egypt around 2500 BCE., and Caesar Augustus was the Emperor of Rome from September 23, 63 BCE to August 19, 14 CE., shown in this work as a general from Primaport, Italy.
Leonardo da Vinci used flawless subject matter, form, content, and iconography to create his painting The Last Supper. Leonardo da Vinci painted his interpretation of what the Last Supper looked like through his work of art. In the center of his painting he painted Jesus Christ, the son of God, in the middle of all of his disciples. On each side of him there are an even number of six disciples sitting at a table pointing to themselves and to each other. Da Vinci painted this scene inside of a dark room with three windows, eight doors, and a beautiful outside environment. In order to paint this scene da Vinci used flawless form.
The Last Supper by Leonardo is very different to Tintoretto’s representation of the same incident. The last supper is one of the most important occurrences which took place in the Christian religion such an important event that many have seen the need for the event visually recorded through art the two most famous of these representations are by far Tintoretto’s and Leonardo’s works. The Last Supper by Leonardo was created during the renaissance period and is a simple symbolic work with little emotion. Tintoretto however chose to represent the event in a surrealistic manner to give full impact; A way in which was typical of the art period in which he painted the work, the Mannerist period. The two works although essentially containing the same subject differ immensely. This difference is strongly evident through the artists contrasting use of colour, light, realism, technique perception and focal point/s.
In this sense, this painting is a grand and imagined piece by Michael Lahanas that works to bring together many of history's greatest thinkers at that time, considering only men that is. Given that these men were all assembled in one place and time, it resembled the age of the renaissance. In the sense that the renaissance was a time for different thinkers of all backgrounds to come together and contribute to the common intelligence of mankind. Raphael had to invent a system of to allude to various figures for whom there were no traditional visual types. For example, while the Socrates figure is immediately recognizable from Classical busts, the alleged Epicurus is far removed from his standard type according to Michael Lahanas. Aside from the identities of the figures depicted,many aspects of the fresco have been variously interpreted, but few such interpretations are unanimously accepted among scholars as known by Two Men conversing on a Flight of Steps,and a Head shouting.The popular idea that the rhetorical gestures of Plato and Aristotle are kinds of pointing to the heavens, and down to earth is very likely. The building is in the shape of a Greek cross,which some have suggested was intended to show a harmony between philosophy and Christian theology. The architecture of the building was inspired to have suggested that the building itself was intended to be an advance view of St. Peter's Basilica. There are two
The artwork chosen is a famous Fresco piece titled, “The School of Athens”. Italian Renaissance artist, Raphael, created this masterful work of art from the year 1509-1511. This work of art allows the reader to visualize and examine a deeper understanding into the principles of perception as they are utilized to bring a two-dimensional work of art from a flat surface such as a painting to become an illusion of reality for the viewer. The three principles to be discussed in relation to the painting include the following: Linear Perspective, Principles of Interposition, and Relative Height and Size (should these be capitalized?).
The two paintings and artists I am going to compare and contrast are "The Last Supper" by Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) and "The Last Supper" by Jacopo Tintoretto (1518-1594). Although I am not a religious person, the sight of the painting by Tintoretto amazed me for the simple fact that it is so different from "The Last Supper" I grew up with.
The Last Judgement by Michelangelo is the most preeminent representation of Italian Renaissance fine art, and undoubtedly the most valuable piece of the era. Characteristics of Italian Renaissance artwork are present throughout the painting. Realism, perspective, individualism, light & shadowing and are the most prominent qualities of this painting. Particularly, realism is expressed through the nudity of the people displayed in the painting, not every person’s body is perfect, ideally many bodies have flaws. Realism and expression are shown when “the proportions of his figures grew… more menacing… [and] seething with nudity” (1). The people behind the altar of the Chapel were naked with indecent expressions, displaying individual
The Last Supper is a giant 15feet tall by 29 feet wide painting created during the Renaissance period in the 15th century. Da Vinci was commissioned by Duke of Milan Ludovico Sforza and his duchess Beatrice d’Este. Da Vinci begin creating the portrait in 1495 and completing it in 1498. It is said that the painting of Last Supper is not a true fresco. Da Vinci decided not to apply paint on a wet plaster he experimented by painting directly on a dry plaster using tempura and oil paint. He used this technique to capture the look of an oil painting, but even within his lifetime it began to wear off.