Rail Transportation In Los Angeles County

1653 Words4 Pages

Congested freeways in Los Angeles are well documented in today's pop culture and the impacts on the city's residents are very real. Angelenos experience the effects through wasted gas costs, pollution, and an average of 89 hours spent in traffic (Jones). In hope of relief, 70 percent of Angelenos voted to pass measure M last november, a measure which will allocate $29 billion to rail transit expansion (Metro). However, with the enormous cost of these developments, it is reasonable to question if this measure will successfully reduce traffic congestion. The limitations of rail transportation in Los Angeles County will be discussed as it relates to the following issues: Accessibility and Convenience Measure M looks to extend service to several …show more content…

Accessibility and Convenience: Rail systems have proven to be very successful investments for a number of american cities and much of this success is rooted in population density. Measure M aims expand its network in order to provide greater accessibility by encapturing more residents within service areas. Certainly, expansion will result in greater convenience for those living within walking distance of new stations; however, the impacts of expansion are limited by: The sprawling landscape of los …show more content…

Multiple studies show that rail station tend to be less accessible to lower income populations. One such study focused on Boston found that low income populations tended to live outside of convenient walking distance to rail transit stations resulting in greater access distances. In addition to these disparities, bus stops and lines eliminated due to rail expansion unintendedly make access more difficult for many. One study focused on the Metro Expo line found that many users of bus routes eliminated with this rail line, experienced increased access distances (Houston). Cost Effectiveness Rail transportation may be the most romanticized method of improving transportation in Los Angeles because of success elsewhere; however, it may not deliver the most return on investment. One study by the Dukakis center found that due to gentrification, car ownership near rail stations increased in some cases resulting in lower use of public transportation overall (Nuscas).This finding points to the possibility taxpayer money could be used better spent since: Congestion will persist due to induced demand Ideally, if people that usually drive begin using rail transit, this would lead to a

Open Document