Protocol 30

627 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Freedom of expression vs speech

European Union has adapted the Charter of Fundamental Rights at Strasbourg in 2007. Their intension was to make existing human rights more visible, instead of creating new ones. The Charter is not incorporated in the Treaty of Lisbon, but under the Article 51 TEU, it has ‘the same legal value as the Treaties’. Despite Article 6 TEU and Article 51 of the Charter, some EU states, like the UK and Poland were concern about the ability of ECJ to change their national law. Therefore, the UK and Poland secured the adoption of a special protocol where Charter does not apply fully in both states.

Protocol 30 was included in the Lisbon Treaty: ‘Protocol on the application of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom’. The UK was mainly concern about ECJ’s ability to force any kind of changes to UKs’ labour law, while Poland was mostly concerned about the same-sex marriage and abortion rights. This Protocol has been presented as an ‘opt-out’, which aims that the Charter will not bind Poland and United Kingdom. As stated by Article 1(1) of Protocol 30, ‘The Charter does not extend the ability of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or any court or tribunal of Poland or of the United Kingdom’.
Thus, there are no clear legal rights that can be pleaded against the UK or Poland before national or Union courts. Additionally, Article 1(1) is unclear written and leads to different ways of interpretation, but cannot extended it . For example, there are numerous cases where UK court relies on ‘freedom of expression’ as the general principle law, thus Article 1(1) does not add much to the existing jurisprudence. Another interpretation would be that, if Charter of Fundamental...

... middle of paper ...

...in) per Munby J at paragraph 73: “the Charter is not at present legally binding in our domestic law and is therefore not a source of law in the strict sense. But it can, in my judgment, properly be consulted insofar as it proclaims, reaffirms or elucidates the content of those human rights that are generally recognised throughout the European family of nations, in particular the nature and scope of those fundamental rights that are guaranteed by the Convention”.
Treaty of Lisbon, 2009, Protocol 30, article 1(2)
European Union Law, pp 229
R (Saeedi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) EWHC 705 (Admin) ibid, Lord Cranston J, para 155
Treaty of Lisbon, 2009, Protocol 30, Article 2
Attorney General v X [1992] 2 CMLR 277
The Lisbon Treaty: A legal and Political Analysis, pg 162
European Union Law: Cases and Materials, pg 258 ibid, pg 259

Show More
Related

  • Comparison of US Bill of Rights and The Canadian Charter of Rights

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, although no powers or rights have been explicitly ‘reserved’ to the people, supporters of the charter nevertheless appear to give Canadians hope that the possibility may exist. COMPARISON OF BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • the enforcement of EU law

    1783 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the EC makes a law it is up to the individual state to implement the legislation. An example of EU law which has been passed which has been adopted in the UK is that of the directive 75/117 which states that men and women should receive equal pay. The UK government adopted this directive with the 1975 Sex discrimination Act.

    Read More

  • Historical Moments In Canadian History Essay

    1226 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom is a bill of rights included in the Constitution of Canada. It forms the first part of the Constitution Act,1982. The document includes pictures of the Canadian coast of arms, the flag of Canada, the Parliament Building, and the signature of the former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. The purpose of the Charter is to guarantees certain political rights to Canadian citizens. These rights include:

    Read More

  • How National Initiatives Promote Anti Discriminatory Practice

    3061 Words  | 7 Pages

    European convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950- This is the European file connecting to human rights; in European Union this is signed by every government as well as the UK. This has been made to protect the human rights and how it’s made is that it helps for the important freedoms in the European countries.

    Read More

  • The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    2464 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II April 17, 1982. Often referred to as the Charter, it affirms the rights and freedoms of Canadians in the Constitution of Canada. The Charter encompasses fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, language rights and equality rights. The primary function of the Charter is to act as a regulatory check between Federal, Provincial and Territorial governments and the Canadian people. Being a successor of the Canadian Bill of Rights that was a federal statute, amendable by Parliament, the Charter is a more detailed and explicit constitutional document that has empowered the judiciary to render regulations and statutes at both the federal and provincial levels of government unconstitutional. Although the rights and freedoms of Canadians are guaranteed, Sections one and seven of the Charter permit the federal and provincial governments to limit the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Canadians. Section one of the Charter designated ‘Rights and freedoms in Canada’ states “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” This section is frequently referred to and better known as the reasonable limits clause. The second rights and freedoms limiting section of the Charter, known as the ‘notwithstanding clause’ is Section thirty-three entitled ‘Exception where express declaration’ declares

    Read More

  • The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted under the Pierre Trudeau government on April 17, 1982. According to Phillip Bryden, “With the entrenchment of the Charter into the Canadian Constitution, Canadians were not only given an explicit definition of their rights, but the courts were empowered to rule on the constitutionality of government legislation” (101). Prior to 1982, Canada’s central constitutional document was the British North America Act of 1867. According to Kallen, “The BNA Act (the Constitution Act, 1867) makes no explicit reference to human rights” (240). The adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly transformed the operation of Canada’s political system. Presently, Canadians define their needs and complaints in human rights terms. Bryden states, “More and more, interest groups and minorities are turning to the courts, rather than the usual political processes, to make their grievances heard” (101). Since it’s inception in 1982 the Charter has become a very debatable issue. A strong support for the Charter remains, but there also has been much criticism toward the Charter. Academic critics of the Charter such as Robert Martin believe that the Charter is doing more harm than good, and is essentially antidemocratic and UN-Canadian. I believe that Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic, although, the Charter itself represents a democratic document. Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic because the power of the executive is enhanced at the expense of Parliament, and the power of the judiciary is enhanced at the expense of elected officials, although, the notwithstanding clause continues to provide Parliament with a check on...

    Read More

  • The Conflict between the Welfare Principle and Article 8

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simmonds C., ‘Paramountcy and the ECHR: a conflict resolved? [2012] Cambridge Law Journal Vol. 71 Issue 3, 498-201

    Read More

  • Margin of Appreciation in ECHR

    2445 Words  | 5 Pages

    Danny Shaw,’UK’s should cut links with ECHR’ BBC News, 7th February 2011 accessed 29th March 2011 < http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12338931#story_continues_1>

    Read More

  • Is the EU Democratic?

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    Tiilikainen, T. 2011. The empowered European Parliament: Accommodation to the new functions provided by the Lisbon Treaty. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Read More

  • Gender Wage Inequality

    1646 Words  | 4 Pages

    "50 Years of EU Gender Equalitylaw." EUROPA. N.p., 25 Oct. 2007. Web. 09 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • Human Rights: The EU Charter Of Fundamental Rights

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    As Craig and De Burca state, 'at the time of the Lisbon Treaty, however, the UK and Poland negotiated a protocol which purports to limit the impact of the Charter in those states.’ . The UK first expressed a desire under protocol 7 which exempts them from being legally bound by the rights outlined in the Charter, they were quickly followed by Poland who also expressed a wish to join protocol 7. The protocol contained two articles which stated that ' The Charter does not extend the ability of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or any court or tribunal of Poland or of the United Kingdom are inconsistent with the fundamental rights, freedoms and principles that it reaffirms ' and ' To the extent that a provision of the Charter refers to national laws and principles, it shall only apply to Poland or the United Kingdom to the extent that the rights or principle that it contains are recognized in the law or practices of Poland or of the United Kingdom. ' However, many argue that regardless of what is outlined in the two articles there is still the question of whether or not the protocol has anything more than declaratory effect. As Craig and de Burca state, 'Article 1 declares that it 'does not extend ' the ability of the CJEU to review national measures for the compatibility of fundamental rights. ' however, we already know that in many cases the Charter influenced judgments of the CJEU before it was made legally

    Read More

  • Human Rights and John Rawls The Law of Peoples

    3870 Words  | 8 Pages

    Human rights, specially those belonging to the first generation, as they are expressed in "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights" of December, 10th, 1948, are the end product of a long...

    Read More

  • Essay On Transparency

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, “the right to the protection of personal data is not, however, an absolute right, but must be considered in relation to its function in society” as put by the Court in Schecke and Eifert. Thus, article 8(2) of the Charter authorises the processing of personal data the conditions are met. In addition to that, article 52(1) of the Charter enviseages the possibility to restrict the rights enshrinded in the Charter if the conditions are fulfilled. The last but not the least important provision is article 52(3) of the Charter which gives the rights in the Charter the same meaning and scope with European Convention on Human Rights

    Read More

  • Codified Constitution

    1876 Words  | 4 Pages

    Additionally, the constitution’s flexibility allows the uncomplicated development and change within the constitution, while its legal aspect remains unaffected . An example of this would be the creation of the ‘Sewel Convention’ in 1999, which prohibited Parliament from legislating on matters that had been devolved to the Scottish Parliament without obtaining its consent beforehand. Therefore, as stated by Professor Ringen , “The British constitution is a complex and evolving living organism,” characterized by its flexibility which proves as an evident advantage for society due to the possibility of the constitution to evolve with society and current political values in a way in which a tennis club, as suggested by the given statement, does

    Read More

  • Ethics in the Modern World

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human rights were devised (UDHR). Everyone has the right to liberty, life, freedom from fear and violence. The obligation to protect individuals and groups the States is required to shield them against human rights abuses (United Nations 2013) The Human Rights Act became effective in the UK in 2000. The purpose of the Human Rights Act is t...

    Read More

More about Protocol 30

Open Document