Pros And Cons Of Stereotype Vs. Generalization

1311 Words3 Pages

Stereotypes are assumptions assigned to groups of people related to their race, nationality, ethnicity, and sometimes their sexual orientation. People put different groups of people in manners that lead to discrimination and can ignore the unique diversity within the different groups. Another idea is that stereotypes are automatically there and will not change, over speculation and over a belief about a particular group or class of people based on experiences.
Stereotype vs. Generalization
While all stereotypes are generalizations, not all generalizations are stereotypes. Stereotypes are misunderstandings or ideas of different people widely used in certain societies. In the United States, for example, racial groups are linked to stereotypes such as being good at math, athletics, crimes and others as well. So well-known are these stereotypes in countries that the average American would not likely hesitate if asked which nationality is known for being great hockey players. On the other hand, a person can make an inference about an ethnic group that hasn’t been as well known in society. Such as, a woman encounters individuals from an ethnic group and finds them to be great parents. Based on …show more content…

Therefore not lingering and thinking about what to do. On the other hand, a disadvantage is that it makes us ignore differences between individuals; therefore we think things about people that might not be true. Most stereotypes usually give us a negative impression. Positive examples would include judges, such as the phrase "sober as a judge," implementing that judges are far less drinkers as maybe other people, overweight people who are often seen as “jolly”. Negative stereotypes seem much more common. Such as an "Arab is a terrorist," or "all blondes are dumb," "all whites are rich," and even "all Mexicans hoped the

More about Pros And Cons Of Stereotype Vs. Generalization

Open Document