Pros And Cons Of Pro Culling

1095 Words3 Pages

Feral animals and surplus animals are understood as environmental threats. Some impacts are, reduction of biodiversity, economical damage, noise pollution and many more. One major strategy of eradicating these animals is culling. However, culling is complex due to opposing perspectives (for and against). Many may argue that culling is inappropriate because of animal rights, inhumanity and so forth. This leads to a whole range of economical, ecological and socio-cultural controversies. It is important to stop these controversies by proposing an answer to whether culling should be practiced or not. This essay will advance the idea that culling is inappropriate yet displaying both perspectives. Economic factors are major driving features of arguments for and against culling. One of pro culling concepts is feral and surplus animals have increased the amount of environmental damage. This positively correlates with economical damage, as funds are needed for restoration. For example, feral water buffalos located in Kakadu National Park contaminate water sources (Robinson et al., 2004). As a result, Jawoyn people suffer from “buffalo belly” needing medical attention (Robinson et al., 2004). Another main issue is water buffalos tend to feed on croplands and cause erosion. It is vital to fix these problems as Jawoyn people depend on those resources to survive. Consequently, it costs more money to provide food, replenish croplands, clean waterholes and hire medical aid. This is deemed as unnecessary because culling can potentially prevent …show more content…

Yet, despite these controversies culling should not be practiced due to economical, ecological and socio-cultural reasons. Such as, failed culling (money wastage), eco-tourism, disruption of ecosystem, increase viral spread, disrespecting cultures and inhumanity. However, culling is still practiced today. The only way to stop is by finding a balance between the two opposing

Open Document