Pros And Cons Of Government Control Over Our Diets

666 Words2 Pages

Over the past years the government has released more and more control over what we can do and about what is good for us. The government is always deciding on whether or not to expand or start a different problem. Governments only job is to protect the nation from invasions from other countries and to provide essential services the citizens need in order to function. The problem that the government sees is the population being to obese and overweight and many people are still happy with the lifestyle. I believe Government should not have control over our diets because we are not all made the same because people should choose to eat healthy , government would issue food bans on food labeled unhealthy by them, and Takes away our freedom of choice. …show more content…

He is talking about our surroundings because if we are in the city we are more likely to eat greasy junk food than a heart salad or home cooked meal than that of a rural area. The government is trying to blame the lack of education of nutrition other comment from Mr. Bakst is “The primary justification made for government intervention is the public’s inadequate information regarding nutrition” (Bakst). The government thinks that because the citizens don’t know what they are eating that it might be the problem and to why a third of the population is suffering from obesity and more than 610,000 die from heart disease which can be prevented just by making healthier choices. The choice to eat healthy is a mindset because if they believe they can do it then making healthier choices are easier and can prevent some diseases just but changing what they

Open Document