Pros And Cons Of Fascism

751 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Short notes on fascism

Why Fascism is not all Evil

Did you know that back in the 1930s there were Fascist parties and movements all over Canada? How about the fact that the father of President John F. Kennedy, Joseph Kennedy, was an avid supporter of European Fascists, as was Charles Lindbergh, the famous pilot who made the first non-stop transatlantic flight? Generally, Fascism is regarded as one of the most cruel, unjust and ugly political systems to have ever existed. It is commonly associated with “Hitler’s Germany” or Nazism, a system that involved strong elements of racism and anti-Semitism. What I will argue in the next few paragraphs is that our understanding and knowledge of Fascism is surrounded by many misconceptions, including the fact that the notions …show more content…

To begin with, it promotes national unity and patriotism by spending the country's resources on patriotic events such as military marches and parades. At different historic points, patriotism has proven to boost the country's economy and make the government politically stable. Another advantage of the Fascist system is its obsession with the country’s security. Since part of Fascist ideology is the opinion that world peace is impossible to achieve, much of the country’s wealth is spent on its military. This results in the country being much more secure from potential attacks or invaders. The fact that a Fascist state is governed by a dictator means that, unlike in a democracy, the political decision-making process is much faster and simpler. Depending on the situation, for example acts of war, natural disasters, major terrorist acts, etc. this can serve as a huge political …show more content…

This Fascist ideology does not promote cruelty but rather seeks to promote unity, strength and purity. Fascism is a strong and powerful system that instills patriotism and prioritizes military investments in order to increase national security. Though Fascism differs from modern day political systems like Canada’s democracy, it offers unique, exclusive benefits. Historically, Fascism was favored by many notable individuals such as Joseph Kennedy, Charles Lindbergh, etc. It was “Hitler’s Germany” that gave the system a negative image and an unfavorable public perception. By being able to distinguish between Fascism and Nazism, we are not only able to erase the system’s negative association but also combine its benefits with those of other political

Show More
Related

  • Account for the responses of the European democracies to the military aggression by Italy and Germany during the 1930s.

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    These were pivotal times in the annals of world history in the 20th century. Mussolini and Hitler’s rise to power was clearly a threat to the freedoms of the United States and its Allies. Through God’s grace and omnipotence, the US alliance, industrialization and intellectual might, we had the resources required to overcome the fierce and mighty threat of Fascism in the Free World.

    Read More

  • Compare Adorno ` S And Altemeyer's Approaches To Authoritarianism

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adorno et al. (1950) believe that authoritarianism stems from a strict, obedience-centred upbringing. He believed that a child who is raised in a household which structures itself upon core values of respect, discipline and obedience will be shaped by these attitudes in adulthood (The Open University, 2015, p28). These attitudes are what shape an individual’s personality, and following the Second World War, Adorno and his colleagues wished to gain a better understanding of the authoritarianism which was at the heart of the Nazi regime, and more specifically, focused on the attitudes towards Jews within Europe. Adorno et al. believed that

    Read More

  • Fascism Defined in the Context of Mussolini's Italy and Nazi Germany

    1365 Words  | 3 Pages

    Because fascism has been practiced in a variety of locations, at differing points in history, with no specific guidelines, every seemingly practical definition of fascism is simply too limiting to serve as a proper definition. Furthermore, to speak of fascism in generalizations prohibits one from truly understanding the completely confused concept. To avoid such generalizations, one must look at fascism as it was found in specific examples. Such examples include, Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany. Although these two instances are not all encompassing of the ideology, they exhibit fascism to the greatest proportions. Additionally, these instances allow one to get a vivid and practical notion to what fascism truly is.

    Read More

  • Adolf Hitler's Political Goals And Social Philosophies

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler’s political goals and social philosophies can be seen vividly through a brief excerpt of his autobiography/exposition entitled “Mein Kampf” or “My Struggles.” Hitler’s thoughts seemed to arise from a mind that blamed the German

    Read More

  • Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal During The Great Depression

    129 Words  | 1 Pages

    Sheldon Richman, an author for The Concise Encyclopedias of Economics refers to fascism as “socialism with a capitalist veneer.” He continues

    Read More

  • The Rise and Subsequent Fall of the Third Reich

    4619 Words  | 10 Pages

    Living in the crumbled remains of Germany, or the Weimar Republic, in the 1920’s was a dismal existence. Hyperinflation was rampant and the national debt skyrocketed as a result of the punishing features of the Treaty of Versailles. During the depression, however, a mysterious Austrian emerged from the depths of the German penal system and gave the desperate German people a glimpse of hope in very dark times. He called for a return to “Fatherland” principles where greater Germany was seen as the center of their universe with zealous pride. Under Hitler’s leadership, Nazi Germany rapidly grew and expanded, continually approaching the goal of world domination and the “Thousand-Year Reich” that Hitler promised the German people. Only a few years later, Nazi Wehrmacht soldiers could be seen marching the streets from Paris to Leningrad (St. Petersburg, Russia). The German Empire, however, like all other expansive empires, had its limits and integral components such as resources, manpower, and industrial capacity began to fall in short supply further crippling the Nazi war machine. Basically, by 1944, “Nazi Germany’s fundamental problem was that she has conquered more territory than she could defend” (Ambrose, 27). Hitler conquered a vast area and vowed to defend every single inch of his empire with every last drop of blood at his disposal. As Frederick the Great warned, “He who defends everything, defends nothing” (Ambrose, 33). It is interesting to study any empire’s rise and fall because similarities are always present, even with some nations today promising to fight the evil, when it reality, it might be becoming what it vows to fight.

    Read More

  • How To Compare Fascism And Communism

    827 Words  | 2 Pages

    Communism and fascism are two influential ideologies associated with European totalitarianism in the 20th century. Though communism contributed to the rise of fascism and Soviet Union’s expansion during Cold War, I believe that fascism had more influence at the time: its favor of authoritarianism gave rise to violent dictatorship in fascist nations, its hatred for other races led to the notorious Holocaust, and its ultranationalism stimulated German expansionism which catalyzed the outbreak of WWII; those catastrophes controlled the way people lived, caused great damage to the involved nations and races, and ultimately led to new world order with United States and Soviet Union as sole superpowers.

    Read More

  • Rise Of Fascism And Totalitarianism

    1589 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fascism is defined as, “an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.” Peter Hyland reports that throughout the 1920s and the 1930s, an economic depression was growing and becoming widespread throughout the world. People were losing faith in their democracies and in capitalism. Leaders who gained power supported powerful militarism, nationalism, and initiated the return of an authoritarian rule. J.R. Oppenheimer says that the rise of fascism and totalitarianism in Europe and Russia instigated a “critical step on the path to war.”

    Read More

  • The Rise of Nazism During World War Two

    1964 Words  | 4 Pages

    To this day it remains incomprehensible to justify a sensible account for the uprising of the Nazi Movement. It goes without saying that the unexpectedness of a mass genocide carried out for that long must have advanced through brilliant tactics implemented by a strategic leader, with a promising policy. Adolf Hitler, a soldier in the First World War himself represents the intolerant dictator of the Nazi movement, and gains his triumph by arousing Germany from its devastated state following the negative ramifications of the war. Germany, “foolishly gambled away” by communists and Jews according to Hitler in his chronicle Mein Kampf, praises the Nazi Party due to its pact to provide order, racial purity, education, economic stability, and further benefits for the state (Hitler, 2.6). Albert Speer, who worked closely under Hitler reveals in his memoir Inside the Third Reich that the Führer “was tempestuously hailed by his numerous followers,” highlighting the appreciation from the German population in response to his project of rejuvenating their state (Speer, 15). The effectiveness of Hitler’s propaganda clearly served its purpose in distracting the public from suspecting the genuine intentions behind his plan, supported by Albert Camus’ insight in The Plague that the “townsfolk were like everybody else, wrapped up in themselves; in other words, they were humanists: they disbelieved in pestilences”(Camus, 37). In this sense “humanists” represent those who perceive all people with virtue and pureness, but the anti-humanist expression in the metaphor shows the blind-sidedness of such German citizens in identifying cruel things in the world, or Hitler. When the corruption within Nazism does receive notice, Hitler at that point given h...

    Read More

  • The History Of Stalin's Great Purges

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the worst nations to suffer from Stalin’s great purges in the Soviet Union was not the Russians. Fascist sought to rejuvenate their nation based on commitment to the national community as an organic entity which individuals are bound together by ancestry, culture, and blood which are all super personal connections. However, even though Stalin did enforce Russia of the Soviet Union the main enemies of his were the political opponents and their followers. His most ferocious acts of terror “The Great Purges” took place between 1934 and 1939.

    Read More

  • The Horrors of The Holocaust

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler, as the new dictator of Germany, had an image of the "perfect society." This image, though, did not include a group of what Hitler declared "undesirables." This group included t...

    Read More

  • Take Home DBQ Italian Fascism

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    It was during the 1920’s to the 1940’s that totalitarian control over the state escalated into full dictatorships, with the wills of the people being manipulated into a set of beliefs that would promote the fascist state and “doctrines”.

    Read More

  • To what extent did Nazi anti-Semitism stem from historical European anti-Semitism

    3095 Words  | 7 Pages

    Beginning in 1920 in the form of propaganda on the side of typical consumer items and lasting all the way until mid-1945, Nazi anti-Semitism had been a prominent characteristic of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers’ Party). Nazi anti-Semitism has often been considered an anomaly from the anti-Semitism that Europe had traditionally practiced, because of its deliberate execution of the Jewish Question and the horrific cruelty that took place during the Holocaust. It is no question that Nazi anti-Semitism was remembered for its unmatched hatred of the Jews; however, the influence from European anti-Semitism in the medieval times was heavy. The Nazis’ adoption of the “Jew badge” and psychological and racial grounds for justification of anti-Semitism are only a small percentage of the techniques employed by Nazis’ that were inspired by the traditional European actions against Jews. This essay will discuss whether the Nazis simply continued the strands of European anti-Semitism that were already in place or whether they initiated a revolutionary materialization of a sinister phenomenon.

    Read More

  • Nazism to Neo Nazism

    1409 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the downfall of Nazism under the rule of Adolf Hitler in 1945, the Allied Forces and the newly established German governments made efforts to hinder the emergence of a new Nazi movement in the area through the denazification process . Neo- Nazi activity was limitedly seen on the outside perimeters of German society. Some former Nazis in the 1960’s, however, have once again grasped the Nazi ideologies and beliefs and have tried to pass it on to the new generations. They worked to reintroducing the concepts which were widespread during the Nazi period from 1933 to 1945 like racial nationalism, anti- Semitism, white supremacy, policies of fascism and a philosophy centered on their allegiance to Hitler.

    Read More

  • Nazim as Totalitarianism

    1818 Words  | 4 Pages

    Historians argue that in Nazism, ‘the value of the totalitarian concept seems extremely limited’ as they compare the regime to other totalitarian states. They state that Nazism could not have been totalitarianism because it wasn’t as organized and monolithically structured as Stalin’s Russia. The Nazism ideology was a mere scheme of self-fulfilment and lacked the methodical theory of Marxism. Under no circumstance was there a level of state possession and influence over the economy in comparison to that which developed in Stalin’s Russia. In spite of the Nazi Party’s dominance over state affairs, authority was divided between themselves and a quantity of major power groups including the industrialists and the armed forces, while Stalin’s Communist Party possessed unconditional power over all Russian state affairs. A German historian stated that Hitler ‘...brought about a state of affairs in which the various autonomous authorities ranged alongside and against one another...’ Hitler relied on a level of popularity from the nation acquired through promoting himself through propaganda to maintain his leadership. There are no implications that Stalin sought popular appeal to maintain his power. Generally, historians have debated the weak dictatorship of Hitler but never have they contemplated ...

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Fascism

Open Document