Comparative Analysis: Manual vs Automated Chest Compressions

1784 Words4 Pages

I am doing a research paper to compare manual chest compression vs automated chest compressions. In this paper I will compare which method has the highest success in ROSC, 30 days out come, and the pros and cons of both methods. Each year there is about 460,000 individuals that die from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and emergencies. Research and Studies have shown that approximately only 5% to 15% of patients treated with standard CPR survive cardiac arrest. This made me question is there better ways out there that are more effective, more efficient, and can save the lives of many more all while being able to keep the care providers safer and more effective in other places of cardiac arrest care. By performing great quality CPR that …show more content…

One place CPR has been incorrectly done the most is in the back of a moving ambulance. Due to the small sizes of ambulances and road conditions along with many other contributing factors such as traffic, the route taken, and patient size, great, continues, CPR is difficult to perform in the ambulance. Failure to perform correct chest compressions can negatively impact survival and patient care. The quality of CPR is an important factor that contributes to survival in sudden cardiac arrest. In one experimental study which used pigs shows how much of a difference there is between high quality CPR and low quality CPR. In this study they put the pig in 4 minutes of ventricular fibrillation and then 9 minutes of CPR before defibrillation. In a study the group that received low subpar compressions that were 1.5 inches’ in depth and only 80 compressions per minute only two out of nine pigs survived. In the second group that received high quality compressions that were 2 inches’ in depth and at a 100 compressions per minute eight of nine pigs survived. With this study it was proven how much of a difference high quality CPR increased survival ability of sudden cardiac arrests. Being able to perform high quality CPR is the first step in successful …show more content…

These devices are the Lucas 2, autopulse, and Thumper. The most popular of these being the Lucas 2. Mechanical CPR is a great alternative to manual CPR, due to advantages of elimination of the rescuer fatigue factor, more consistent and reliable chest compression, and eliminating the need to stop CPR during rescuer changes and patient transfers. It is also conceivably safer for the ambulance crew during transport due to being able to be seat belted in the moving vehicle. However, results from clinical trials have been conflicting, with studies suggesting a benefit for mechanical CPR and others that failed to find any difference between manual and mechanical CPR in survival to discharge of the patient to rehab or home. There can be possible explanations for these unexpected results such as prolonged deployment time for the devices resulting in delayed defibrillation and enrollment bias. A study of the outcome of mechanical and manual CPR was performed, this study also called the “pragmatic" trial was designed to assess device use under real-life conditions in the front line of cardiac emergencies compared with standard CPR for resuscitation of nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac

More about Comparative Analysis: Manual vs Automated Chest Compressions

Open Document