Pros And Cons Of A Patient Consenting

553 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 12 rights of patients

Patient Consent and Rationing
I believe the patients have the right to refused treatment for any reason. Caring for the patients includes respecting the patients wishes. A patient can ethically refuse treatment for the purpose of saving money, not having the money for treatment, emotional, physical adverse effects, and for religious reasons, even if the treatment would benefit the patient. It is the patient who would be affected by the decision. For example, if the patient followed the doctor’s advice to have chemotherapy, the patient would agree to endure extreme amount of pain and inherent a huge hospital bill only to live a year or so. The patient has the right to die with dignity and save the money for his or her love ones. Part of the

Show More
Related

  • Medical Paternalism Analysis

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient

    Read More

  • Uustal Ethical Decision Making Model Essay

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    We have one resident in the long-term facility who has stage four cancer of spinal cord and he has been suffering from intense pain. Every time when I enter his room, he cries and implore to the god that he can minimize his suffering. He has prescription of hydromorphone 8 mg every 4 hourly PRN , oxycodone 5 mg every 6 hourly and 50 mcg of fentanyl path change every 3rd day. After giving all scheduled and PRN medicine his pain level remains same as before. When I see that patients I feel like to give highest dose of medicine as well as alternative pain management therapy so that he can have some comfort but ethically I have no right to do that. He is hospice but he has no comfort at all. Following are the nine steps of Uustal ethical decision making model.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Conscientious Objection In Medicine: A Moral Dilemma

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    At first, I believed that a patient should have the say so and get what they demand. I didn’t feel sympathetic for the health care provider one bit. I was able to look through the eyes of a physician and see the trials that they have to go through. It is not easy making the decisions that they have to make. There job is based on decisions, and most of it is the patient’s. “There will certainly be times when I will be faced with a request from a patient or patient’s representative that I will personally find morally difficult, but one that is still legally and ethically acceptable. must be very difficult to work in an area with little control over what you want to do.” (Bradley 1). Even though I do not fully understand a health care providers everyday role, I do know that they are faced with painful options. I personally feel that I can not work in this field for that exact reason. Health care providers play an extremely important role in our society, and others need to look upon

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Medical Consent

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America, the legal age to sign off on any medical consent is 18 years of age. Seventeen year olds should be able to compose their own medical decisions, and sign off on their own medical consents. Power should land in their hands, accompanied by the professional advice of a doctor. It is your body, be compelled to fabricate a decision without having to have your parent’s signature.

    Read More

  • Decisions from Health Care Providers

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Patients are ultimately responsible for their own health and wellbeing and should be held responsible for the consequences of their decisions and actions. All people have the right to refuse treatment even where refusal may result in harm to themselves or in their own death and providers are legally bound to respect their decision. If patients cannot decide for themselves, but have previously decided to refuse treatment while still competent, their decision is legally binding. Where a patient's views are not known, the doctor has a responsibility to make a decision, but should consult other healthcare professionals and people close to the patient.

    Read More

  • Dax's Case Summary

    364 Words  | 1 Pages

    treatment should be further assessed. Due to shock and pain a patient may have a lapse in judgement as to what they truly want for care. One morally relevant detail, when it comes to Dax’s case, it was about ten months of begging to be allowed to die as he was forced to undergo excruciatingly painful and invasive procedures. During this time the doctors should have disregarded their want to be a ethically virtuous character, and instead advocated what is wanted for the patient. If the doctors would have followed deontological ethics and listened to Dax, he would not have had to live forcibly blind and disabled. This wrongdoing by the doctor’s made Dax not able to live the quality in life in which he desired. The majority of the wrongdoing that

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the same time, the church recognizes that a dying person has the moral option to refuse extraordinary treatments that only minimally prolong life. “The predominant distinction or criteria for legitimate refusal of treatment is whether the treatment in question is considered proportionate or disproportionate,” Di Camillo says. This means patients can legitimately forgo “treatment that doesn’t give a reasonable hope of physical or spiritual benefit, such as resuscitating someone who is at the very end of life,” he says.

    Read More

  • Patient Autonomy Case Study

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the morning of May 17th, 2005, Nola Walker was involved in a two-car collision. Police and Ambulance were dispatched and arrive on scene at the intersection of Kenny and Fernley Street. Ambulance conducted various assessments on Ms. Walker which revealed no major injuries and normal vital signs. Mrs walker denied further medical investigation and denied hospital treatment. Later on, Queensland police conducted a roadside breath test that returned a positive reading, police then escorted Ms. Walker to the cairns police station. Ms. Walker was found to be unconscious, without a pulse and not breathing. An ambulance was called but attempts to revive her failed (Coroner’s Inquest, Walker 2007). The standard of Legal and ethical obligation appeared by paramedics required for this situation are flawed and require further examination to conclude whether commitments of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice were accomplished.

    Read More

  • Gaining Consent In Nursing

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    By gaining consent Jean's autonomy will be respected and maintained. It is important that all nurses and other health care professions uphold the professional standard when providing direct care to individual, community and groups. Gallagher and Hodge (2012) states reinforce a person's right to exercise choice in relation to personal and bodily integrity and to have that choice respected. Before administrating the medication to Jean the nurse and student nurse made sure that she was given a choice by obtaining consent from Jean first. According to the NMC Code (2015) make sure that you get properly informed consent and document it before carrying out any action.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    Others will argue that if a patient is terminally ill, they are not in the correct mindset to make that decision. Although, what opposers fail to recognize or acknowledge is what the person is going through. Like how I mentioned earlier that the pain they are experiencing is unimaginable. When you are in pain, you want it to be over as soon as possible. We all know when enough is enough. This kind of pain is prolonged and more severe like the heart racing. There are other ways for stopping pain, minimal pain, but this pain is way too severe to stop with some medication. The only way to stop it is to end it all at

    Read More

  • Cancer Argumentative Essay

    1541 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cancer patients often wonder if going through treatments like chemotherapy and radiation are worth the risk of the side effects, in addition to the cancerous side effects. They feel that they can’t enjoy or relax in what a short amount of time they have left because they are bedridden from the nausea and pain that treatments put them through. Patients tell their loved ones to just let them die so long as they don’t have to go through any more pain. Those who are too old, are unable to recover from the effects, or are just too far in the grips of cancer, should refuse the more harsh treatments like chemo and radiation. On the positive side, refusing treatments after a certain point can save their families from the stress and cost of hospital bills. If caught early enough, patients can opt for safer and easier routes to getting rid of cancer like surgery or by doing a stem cell transplant.

    Read More

  • Bioethics

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...rity over a patient, since it is the patient who is directly affected by any course of treatment taken, the final decision should remain in the hands of the patient. The risk of losing patient autonomy by allowing doctors a free hand with what they think is the correct treatment seems to be too high. The patient should have the right to accept or reject any course of treatment so long as that decision is made with informed consent. Thus it would be ethically incorrect for Dr. Lowell to try and coerce her patient into following her recommended treatment. However, I think that Dr. Lowell would not be morally incorrect in trying to explain to Mrs. Jackson about the details of the treatment. Perhaps Mrs. Jackson has a fear of losing her hair during chemotherapy and Dr. Lowell could explain to her that hair loss does not occur inevitably with chemotherapy but varies person to person. Maybe if Mrs. Jackson knew more about what the treatment entails she might change her mind about it.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Religion In The Medical Field

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, patients are not the only problem. In some cases the doctor will withhold treatment options because of their morals or on personal beliefs, “these procedures [include] administering terminal sedation in dying patients, providing abortion for failed contraception, and prescribing birth control to adolescents without parental

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Hospice

    1360 Words  | 3 Pages

    Does a physicians holistic beliefs lean either way? Our doctors need to grant patients the ultimate control over what has become their last earthly possession, the right to die on their own terms. (Benda, 2007) With today's technology, physicians find themselves struggling with a modern dilemma of deciding whether impending life-sustaining treatments should be withheld or provided. Medical professionals take the Hippocratic Oath, swearing to fulfill to the best of their ability to tread with care in matters of life and death.

    Read More

  • Escape Fire Essay

    569 Words  | 2 Pages

    The system does not want patients to die, but it does not want the to get better either. The aim is to just treat the symptoms of the disease, rather than treating the actual disease so the patients will keep coming back and the health care centers and pharmaceutical companies can continue to make money. Hospitals and other related health care centers have become solely focused on making a profit. The pharmaceutical companies incentivize the physicians to prescribe their drugs rather than carefully considering all possible treatment plans and choosing which would most benefit the patient. Furthermore, doctors are over scheduled with patients. They are paid for quantity of patients seen rather than quality of care provided. In the video, it mentioned that the female doctor was being scheduled for 30 patients per hour, meaning that she had two minutes each patient on average. This is not enough time for doctors, nurses, or any other health care provider to make sound decisions, let alone perform a thorough assessment of the patient. Although hospitals are a business and the business aspects needs to be successful in order to keep the doors open, I think it is ethical and morally wrong to be making such a profit off of patients by greatly inflating the costs. I believe that access to health care should be a right, not a

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of A Patient Consenting

Open Document