Plato Theory Of Forms Essay

1229 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Where does plato describe his theory of forms

Plato sets out to solve two problems with theory of Forms. The two problems are the ethical problems and the problems of permanence and change. The ethical problem consists of happiness, fulfillment of human life, and most importantly how people attach themselves to the material things when they attach themselves to these material things when they can be easily taken away from them. The problem of permanence and change consist of questions of how the world can be permanent but still changing and which one is real. So, Plato splits up the existence into two parts; material part and transcended part. By doing so, people can see that they can find the reals of forms by using the mind, and the reason that humans have, which should give an idea of what an unchanging world. By detaching ourselves from material things in this world we find value which is not crumbling which solves the ethical issue. The second problem was perceived my mind and senses. When we perceive the world with senses, it helps us see the material things which are constantly changing. But when we perceive the world with our mind, which is not changing, helps us see the permanence in world.
Plato believes that forms are pure. By this he means that they have characteristics of a pure substance that differs from other properties of objects. It has its own pure property. For example a door is a pure substance.
Door is a material substance with many properties that makes it a door. Its shape, color, texture, and many more make up this door. These entire put together makes a door. A form is just one of these properties that exist by itself apart from time and space. Forms are different from material objects because forms are pure and transcendent. Material objects are ve...

... middle of paper ...

...to be an oak tree. Its changes are not random because the tree does not change into a pig or a horse while growing up. It changes in a way that is necessary to get to its goal. This is because some parts of the seed did not change. The essential form makes it what it is and guides it to be a tree and not something else. So, there can be permanent objects that are always changing and some that do not.
Aristotle uses dissimilarity to explain change. He believes that change can occur because matter can be arranged in many ways that can be different from one another. When the play ought was destroyed to make something else, the play dough still remained. So, we can infer that is it the form that changes while the matter remains unchanging. Changes also occur when the arrangements of matter changes to from another. So for Aristotle change is when matter takes a new form.

Show More
Related

  • Response To The Allegory Of The Cave

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first realm is the Physical world that we can observe with our senses. And second, is a world made of eternal “forms” or “ideas.” He believes that there exists another dimension where perfect templates exist. This means forms are mind-independent entities. Forms are independently existent whether we grasp them with our mind but do not depend on being grasped in order to exist. In the Allegory Plato compares the level of becoming to living in a cave and describes the ordeal necessary for the soul’s ascent from shadowy illusions to enlightenment. From just an opinion to an informed opinion to rationally based knowledge to

    Read More

  • Plato Vs. Aristotle

    1899 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato's concept of what politics and government should be is a direct result of his belief in the theory of forms. The theory of forms basically states that there is a higher "form" for everything that exists in the world. Each material thing is simply a representation of the real thing which is the form. According to Plato, most people cannot see the forms, they only see their representation or their shadows, as in the simile of the cave.

    Read More

  • Platos Argument For A Just Life

    1677 Words  | 4 Pages

    For this reason, Plato believes that we must separate the soul based on how it

    Read More

  • John Locke on Personal Identity

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    Locke viewed the identity of living entities in a different light. Above, change in mass constituted a change in identity. But, in living entities a change in mass does not affect the identity of the object. Locke uses the example of the oak tree. It starts off as a sapling and grows into a huge oak tree, with a massive change in mass. That oak tree could be subjected to the cutting of branches, and the winter fall of leaves, however it still remains an oak tree because it continues the life of a tree. It maintains the same functional arrangements of components (Blackburn, 1999: 125-126). An interesting example is raised by Blackburn in assessing “how much change to tolerate while still regarding it as the same ‘thing’” (Blackburn, 1999:127). ‘Theseus’ ship’ is used to illustrate this. The ship goes on a long voyage and is in need of constant repair and maintenance. By the end of the voyage, all the components of the ship have been changed.

    Read More

  • A Critical Analysis of Plato's and Sartre's Views on Existence

    1820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s view on existence can be understood by discussing his theory of Forms. The theory of Forms or Ideas is about the existence of ideas in higher form of reality, the existence of a reality inhabited by forms of all things and concepts. Plato used example of objects such as table and rock and concepts like Beauty and Justice to illustrate the notion of Forms. Plato further describes Forms as a being possessed by concepts. For example, Virtue has different characters; but they all have a common nature which makes them virtuous.

    Read More

  • The Theory of Origin in Aristotle's Metaphysics

    394 Words  | 1 Pages

    Aristotle believes that there are four kinds of changes: What, Place, Quality and Quantity. For example, a pen is by definition the object, it has a position and takes up space, it exists for a period of time and has shape and size. These external characteristics can and will change. According to Aristotle, everything changes. Therefore the pen has potential to move, to change color and size. When it changes from a state of how it is perceived, otherwise known as potential, to a state of what it can be, it has reached a state of actuality.

    Read More

  • Conversation Between Plato and Aristotle

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato: When we discuss Forms we are not talking about something that is truly real but something that we would see or grasp intellectually. The idea of it is that what you are looking at may not be the true form of which you are looking at it. When you draw a circ...

    Read More

  • Pre-Socratic Influences In Plato

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato, like Pythagoras, believes that knowledge of pure Forms and of “Being” is the direct path to someone living a life of salvation and of the highest quality. Plato, like Pythagoras, also believed that all of the forms are geometric figures and mathematical in nature. Also, Plato, like Heraclitus, believed that our world is constantly changing, or in a constant flux. Plato, also agreed with Parmenides, who believed that the real world is not the same as the world of our experience.

    Read More

  • Four Arguments For The World Of Life In Plato's Phaedo

    1217 Words  | 3 Pages

    He argues that non-physical forms or ideas represent the most accurate reality. There exists a fundamental opposition between in the world like the object as a concrete, sensible object and the idea or concept of the objects. Forms are typically universal concepts. The world of appearance corresponds to the body. The world of truth corresponds with the soul. According to Plato, for any conceivable thing or property there is a corresponding Form, a perfect example of that or property is a tree, house, mountain, man, woman, Table and Chair, would all be examples of existing abstract perfect Ideas. Plato says that true and reliable knowledge rests only with those who can comprehend the true reality behind the world of everyday experience. In order to perceive the world of the Forms, individuals must undergo a difficult

    Read More

  • Positions of the Greek Philosophers in Rafael's Painting

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato is placed directly in the middle of the painting, walking beside Aristotle, and holding an animated conversation. Plato wears red clothing, wears no shoes, has long hair, and a long beard. In one hand he holds a book, while his other hand has a single index finger pointing toward the sky. Each of these characteristics describes Plato and his philosophy in a specific manner. The most obvious characteristic about Plato’s portrayal is his index finger pointing toward the sky. This seems to represent his philosophy about ideas, or forms. Plato believed that behind everything in the “sensible world” there is the “intelligible world” which consists of all of these forms and ideas. Plato believed that these forms are immutable, they are not ph...

    Read More

  • Essay On Intrinsic And Extrinsics

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many accounts support the possibility for objects genuinely to persist yet change their intrinsic, natural properties. Intuitively we think that it would be possible: the assumption that this claim is true, Loux argues, ‘underlies some of our most fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us’ (1998: 203). In this essay I shall focus solely on the account of David Lewis’s ‘Doctrine of Temporal Parts’ that it is possible for objects to persist through change by having different temporal parts. By briefly examining intrinsics and extrinsics and the problem of change you will be able to see how successful Lewis’s solution is to this problem, before viewing some weaknesses of the account and then ultimately concluding that Lewis solution successfully achieves the possibility that objects genuinely persist yet change their intrinsic, natural properties.

    Read More

  • Aristotle

    1768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle’s notion of cause represents his idea of how everything comes into being. All change involves something coming from out of its opposite. These causes are split into four: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause and final cause. Change takes place in any of these causes. A material cause is one that explains what something is made out of. An efficient cause is what the original source of change is. A formal cause is the form or pattern of which a thing corresponds to. And a final cause is the intended purpose of the change. All of these causes Aristotle believes explains why change comes to pass. A good example of this is a baseball. The material cause of a baseball is are the materials of which it is made of, so corkwood, stitching, with a rubber core and wrapped in leather. The efficient cause of the baseball would the factory where the ball was made or where the materials were manipulated until they corresponded into a baseball. The formal cause of the ba...

    Read More

  • The Unmoved Mover: God in Aristotle’s Metaphysics

    1471 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rather, Aristotle attempts to tackle some of the most fundamental questions of human experience, and at the crux of this inquiry is his argument for the existence of an unmoved mover. For Aristotle, all things are caused to move by other things, but the unreasonableness of this going on ad infinitum means that there must eventually be an ultimate mover who is himself unmoved. Not only does he put forth this argument successfully, but he also implies why it must hold true for anyone who believes in the ability to find truth through philosophy. Book XII of the Metaphysics opens with a clear statement of its goal in the first line of Chapter One: to explore substances as well as their causes and principles. With this idea in mind, Chapter One delineates the three different kinds of substances: eternal, sensible substances; perishable, sensible substances; and immovable substances.

    Read More

  • Does Perfection Exist?: Plato´s Theory of Forms

    789 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Plato, his Theory of Forms states perfection only lives in the realm of thought. There only exists one of every ideal and the rest is just a copy. This one creation is called a form, the most flawless representation of an idea. In the physical world everything is a copy of these forms and all copies are imperfect. Plato believed in two worlds; the intelligible world and the illusionistic world. The intelligible world is where everything is unchanging and eternal. We can only grasp the intelligible world with our mind. It is the world of ideas and not senses. A place where there are perfect forms of the things we know on Earth. According to Plato everything in the world we live in is an illusion. All objects are only shadows of their true forms. His theory further states every group of objects that have the same defying properties must have an ideal form. For example, in the class of wine glasses there must be one in particular that is the ideal wine glass. All others would fall under this ideal form.

    Read More

  • Platos Concept Of Self

    1191 Words  | 3 Pages

    He believes that the soul takes shelter within the body. The three parts are all located in three different areas: reason is in the mind, spirited is in the heart, and desire is in the stomach. Reason is what controls the whole soul (Plato p. 49). The mind tells the body what to do, how to feel, what to say. The mind controls our appetites and decides who to honor according to memories about those people or events. The spirit is in the heart, the heart is what shows us how we feel about others. The stomach is desire as we crave to have certain possessions such as food or other physical materials in life. If what Plato is saying is any truth, than the argument presented that our soul is our life and our body is nothing but what carries our soul, is therefore false and unsupported by this idea of the mind, heart and stomach. Then so, our thought that Plato’s idea that we can make ourselves alive, is fairly reasonable and true. This is because it is more understandable to say that the reason why our souls are what makes us alive is because our souls are physically made of three parts that control the way we live. Our body is now not only what carries life for us, but what allows us to keep it. Our soul is different from the body because it represents life, but it is our body that allows our lives to

    Read More

More about Plato Theory Of Forms Essay

Open Document