Peter the Chanter’s Vito Sodomitico

872 Words2 Pages

Peter the Chanter or Peter the Chanter was mostly known for his writing and studies that happened while he was in Paris. Peter the Chanter was assumed to have been born between the years of 1127 and 1147 because he died in the year 1197. It is believed that his families were knights and due to Peter self-identification as a knight family. He came to Paris in the early 1170s and rose to prominence when he became chanter of a cathedral in Paris in the year 1182. He called a “leading light in the life of the city” and was important to papacy. He was even elected as the Dean of Reims and had a great influence during his lifetime. With this achievement, he came to be known as Peter of Reims, which is also said to maybe be his place of birth. The reason for this is when Peter became head for Reins he was reminded of his earlier schooling in Reims by Archbishop William of Reims and “how the church of Reims was his first nurse to impart the milk of sound doctrine.”
Peter the Chanter, had a number of students who spread his name to further scholars. His school, which was called the “Biblical moral school” by John Baldwin, had many such famous students such as Stephen Langton, Thomas Cobham, Robert Courson, and Gerald of Whales. Robert of Courson was Peter the Cantor trusted students and in many of Robert’s writing, he cites Peter the Chanter as an enormous influence on his theologian ideals. The other famous theologians of the time where Alian of Lille and Preposititnus and these were known as the three masters by Otto of Saint Blaise.
The social views of Peter and his followers empathized practical morality. He was described by Jacques De Vitry as “a lily among thorns and a rose among thistles.” According to Baldwin, Peter th...

... middle of paper ...

...ten omits the personal stories. The long version is believed to have been written in 1191 and the short version appeared to have been written in 1199 or 1197. I was not able to figure out which version De Vito Sodomitico was apart of but I believe the second version because it leaves out anecdotal stories and is placed very neatly next to the sin of adultery and the sin of indulgence.
The Verbum Abbreviatum can be divided into two parts one devoted to vices and the other to virtues. The De Vito Sodomitico falls within the second part of this book. The reason for this even though the second part is devoted to virtue this is were Peter the Chanter mentions the sins of flesh, included among these sins is the chapter of sodomy. This show the un-organization of his book, which is also reproduced in loosely related chapters that tend not have any particular order.

Open Document