Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fluoride water conspiracy research
Fluoride in water essay
Fluoride in water essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Victoria Singleton
31 October 2013
Comm101- Persuasive Outline
Introduction
I. Attention-getter: Every day in America millions of people are being poisoned, and you could very well be among them.
II. Thesis Statement: Concerns for water fluoridation stem from the toxicity of fluoride, the dangers fluoride pose to the body, and equal declining tooth decay seen for fluoridated and non-fluoridated countries.
III. Credibility Statement: It is fact that we all consume fluoridated water regularly; whether it’s through water directly, food, or other beverages, we could very likely be putting ourselves at risk.
IV. Preview:
A. In reality, fluoride is a highly toxic nuclear waste byproduct that comes from phosphate fertilizer manufacturing (Main 2013).
B. Many researchers
…show more content…
First Main point: Fluoride is a highly toxic element.
A. Sub-point #1: Currently, the primary source of fluoride for the majority of public water supplies is fluorosilicic acid. This is a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer manufacturing (Main 2013).
1. Sub-Sub-point: Promoters like to say it’s a nutrient, when scientifically it has never been classified as a nutrient because it is a very powerful toxin.
B. Sub-point #2: Fluoridation advocators often say that nature thought of fluoride first in the fact that it’s naturally occurring. However, there are a lot of toxic substances that occur at naturally high levels, such as arsenic. This does not mean they are safe.
1. Sub-Sub-point: The main fluoride chemical that is added to water is not what most people would call a naturally occurring compound. It is a corrosive acid captured in the air pollution control devices of the phosphate fertilizer industry.
2. Sub-Sub-point: Christopher Bryson states, “Fluoride is known to be one of the most toxic chemicals in the world.” (2004).
[Transition: Since fact states that fluoride is a toxin, we should easily be able to reach the conclusion that it most likely causes damaging effects to the
chemicals are actually put in to make these foods. Moss has credibility when he mentions the
Fluoride is the only substance added to water that doesn’t affect the water itself but the person consuming the water- fluoride is a medical treatment. The same NHS website that boasts the marvellous pros of the UK’s fluoridation scheme also explicitly explains ‘Consent is required from a patient regardless of the intervention – from a physical examination to organ donation’ on a page regarding the legalities of medical consent. It is required by law that all patients must be aware and accepting of the treatment that they receive therefore feeding us a medicine (if it can even be called that) that we as society in many cases, know very little about is highly illegal and dangerous for everyone involved. Today doctors who give patients treatment without their consent face legal procedures and punishments so the fact that this practice goes on everyday under our noses with no repercussion is astonishing and shouldn’t happen just because the perpetrator (the government) is more powerful than a
Few object to the therapeutic use of fluoride to stop tooth decay, but fluoridation, the addition of fluoride to the public water supply, can spark avid controversy. Most dentists, medical groups, and government officials argue that fluoridation is a cheap and risk-free venture that doubles cavity prevention. In contrast, a small minority of dentists and conservative political groups argue that fluoride is a hazardous, poisonous substance that should not be consumed. Some antifluoridationists even claim that fluoridation is an untrustworthy form of socialized medicine. But rather than just attacking fluoridation as socialized medicine, opponents originally claimed that it was a conspiracy to poison or brainwash Americans through the water supply. This theory arose in the 1940s when the scientific community refused to endorse or reject fluoridation, thus allowing the debate to expand into the social sphere. While fluoridation opposition may be subconsciously inspired by naturalism, the social development of fluoridation into a Communist or fascist conspiracy resulted from a conscious effort by conservatives to suppress a growing government.
Fluoride is being overused in the United States and there needs to be a stop to it. With all the problems it is causing, the limit being used should be something everyone should worry about. Many think fluoride is good for you because it whitens your teeth, and dentist offer it every time you go there, but clearly it is not. Fluoride does help with a lot of things like mottling of teeth and whitening teeth, but health problems are occurring, and it needs to come to a stop. Department of Health and Human Services have recommended a level of 0.7 milligrams per liter as a optimal for fluoride in drinking water throughout the United States. (State of Washington) Clearly, they are using more than normal that is it starting to cause a lot of health problems. To finalize, fluoride is being overused in the US, and there needs to be a stop to
Fluoride is considered a drug by the Food and Drug Administration therefore a type of mediation which is why I made the claim of mass medication, which I believe is unethical to put in a public goods such as water. That is one of the reason other developed nations like Europe decided to stop this practice (FluorideAlert). Fluoride is already found in items such as toothpaste and other like items, putting it in the water just farther leads to over dosing the set limit of fluoride before the FDA declares it unsafe which is 2.4mg per liter of water (FluorideAlert). It can be clearly proven that this limits are surpassed daily for the average person and one sign is that more children are being affected by dental fluorosis, a condition that causes white or brown discoloration or spots on the enamel, or tooth surface that only occurs from to much fluoride and this should not be much of surprise if you include the fact that on top of water having anywhere from 0.7-1.4mg of fluoride, toothpaste is 94% fluoride, processed beverages also contain it, and many other products we would not think of like tea. While its just considered more of a cosmetic issue, it is also an indictor or red flag of over exposure on the rest of the
No study has been shown to require fluoride, it’s not an essential nutrient. There are many studies, however, that show that fluoride can interfere with important organs such as the kidney. Fluoride added to our waters would also add other toxics that we may not know about. “The CDC admits that 43% of fluoridation chemicals tested contain arsenic, 2% contain lead and 3% contain copper” (12 Reasons). How is that supposed to help our bodies or decrease tooth decay?
Topic: Addiction to social media General Purpose: To persuade Specific purpose: To persuade my audience that social media is hurting us mentally and our social lives. Thesis: Social media can cause serious problems to you and your health, so we need to put addiction to social media to rest. I. Introduction A. Attention-getter: The ages of 55 and 64 year olds who use social media fell “worried or uncomfortable” when they can’t access any type of social media accounts (Wright, 2015).
People receive fluoride from many other sources besides water. Some food and beverages processed with fluoridated water are; dental products, tea, and coffee (Connett). No study has been shown to require fluoride, it’s not an essential nutrient. There are many studies however, that show that fluoride can interfere with important organs such as the kidney.
Fluorine is an element that reacts with minerals in the earth to create a salt. The salt is often naturally occurring in nature and is found in very small amounts in urban and rural wells. Although it is found in small amounts, it is thought that by supplementing the water supply with more fluoride will increase dental health and prevent some forms of bacterial illness. With the first report on fluoride in drinking water in 1951 by the (American) National Research Council found that fluoride was safe and effective. It also recommended that communities with many small children consider fluoridation of its water. In 1977 another NRC report took into consideration that trace elements in drinking water may have adverse side effects over a long period of time. The results of the survey stated that fluoride in “optimal” amounts had minimal side effects. While areas with higher than recommended levels of fluoride produced dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis (or the weakening of tooth enamel, bones, and joints). In 2006 the NRC concluded that when children ages 0-8 years old are at greater risk from high fluorine levels and can develop sever dental decay, fragile bones, and sever skeletal fluorosis(alth...
I was not very conscious about HFCS because I looked at it as just a byproduct of many foods. But analyzing the article with the Sociological Imagination made me realize the health aspects, the economic aspects, and the social aspects that can result from HFCS. Now that I am aware of the effects of HFCS, I will be more diligent when purchasing and consuming certain food products.
All water sources, whether fresh or salt, have varying levels of fluoride (Awofeso, 2012). Around 1945 it was discovered that communities with higher rates of naturally occurring fluoride had lower rates of tooth decay (Dean, 1938) which resulted in the addition of artificial fluoride to public water supplies. The incidence of tooth decay fell drastically in fluoridated communities as a result, leading to widespread adoption of public water fluoridation as a public health strategy.
middle of paper ... ... s are dangerous and toxic. Despite the precaution taken in supplementing these chemicals into water, there still exists the probability that these hazardous chemicals will be reproduced by reactions with bodily fluids in areas where they may cause harm to the individual. The production of these chemicals is outlined in the previous section on Chemistry. Future and Conclusion Ultimately, water fluoridation is not a necessary treatment.
Since its introduction in 1945 to community water sources, fluoridation has been advocated as “one of the top ten health achievements of the 20th century” by various organizations concerned with the safety and health of the population (blomberg, CDC). Due to its cariostatic effect on teeth and lack of restriction based on socioeconomic class or access to care, community water fluoridation is currently implemented in 39 countries around the world (O’Malley). However, as time passes, controversial questions have begun to emerge regarding the adverse effects associated with chronic fluoride intake in both children and adults, and whether this should restrict its use in these countries (fluoride). Therefore, the aim of this literature review
Fluoride in our drinking water serves a very important function for oral health. According to the American dental Association (ADA), more than 70 years of scientific research has consistently shown that an optimal level of fluoride in community water is safe and effective in preventing tooth decay by at least 25 percent in both children and adults. Fluoride prevents tooth decay and has been proven to prevent this common childhood disease. Protecting against cavities is the most beneficial way of preventing multiple types of oral disease. In my current county of El Paso Texas, The fluoridation of our drinking water exceeds the recommended levels so I started researching what U.S city was lacking to raise concern. I found that Portland,