Persuasive Essay On Performance Enhancing Drugs

635 Words2 Pages

There has been controversy on performance enhancing drugs for years, but some recent and infamous cases have brought the subject of the matter to light. From the case of Lance Armstrong to many other cases in other major pro sports organizations such as the NFL, NHL, MLB and even in college sports. All of the cases have been shamed and ridiculed for their breach of contract, but not everyone wants to talk about the positive outcomes of such decisions being acceptable in sports, as well as some cases being non intentional. Drug testing was introduced at the Olympics in 1968. The IOC (International Olympic Committee) had developed a list of banned substances because it gave an unfair advantage to the athletes who couldn’t obtain any steroids or other enhancing substances. I believe that performance enhancing drugs should be acceptable to use in sports because they give athletes the same advantage as coaching or training, the legalizing of the drugs would allow …show more content…

How can it be unfair? Is having more access to advantages unfair? For example, if one man has access to the best coach in the world, is it unfair to a man who doesn’t have that opportunity? I might compare using drugs to enhance performance to using Dayquil to function with a cold. With the equal opportunity to use them, it gives everyone a fair chance. Sports are improving, with new technologies and available supplements to give an edge. What is the difference between using skills and training to better performance as opposed to using drugs? What is the difference between a nose strip allowing greater air intake and a pill that reduces the resistance in the airway of athletes? The legalizing of the drugs would allow them to be safely administered by medical professionals and would allow the users to know exactly what is in it and how potent the substance is rather than turning to shady back alley

Open Document