Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
U.S. use of drones to fight terrorism
Drone warfare pros and cons
Drone warfare pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: U.S. use of drones to fight terrorism
Danger Drone Today, more and more people are using drones. Drones are fairly new and so there are not many restrictions on them. For avid hobbyists, drones are a fun way to pass the time, however, criminals can easily manipulate drones and cause panic to the public. One concern of the public with drones is that drones have the ability to invade people’s privacy. The government uses drones to carry out airstrikes on suspected terrorists although it’s a useful tactic, the airstrikes can easily kill innocent civilians. Drones can be a fun way to pass the time, but in the wrong hands can cause a lot of problems. The government needs to keep a close eye on drones and put regulations in as needed. Drones are becoming a big deal to an increasing …show more content…
The U.S has sent these UAVs into Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, which is far away from where any American troop has been. engaged. The U.S has been using drones to diminish the al Qaeda forces. Despite the Obama administrations call for limits on drone strikes, Washington still uses them to kill off Al Qaeda leadership. “In Pakistan, the approximately 350 strikes since 2004 have cut the number of core al Qaeda members in the tribal areas by about 75 percent, to roughly 50-100.” (Kurth para. 2), which has resulted in a decrees of attacks in the area the drones hit. Al Qaeda proved remarkably adaptable to the drone attacks. In February a document was left behind by Islamist fighters fleeing Mali, the document detailed tips for avoiding drone attacks, twenty-two tips in total. Ranging from using trees as cover, to placing statues and dolls outside to mislead aerial intelligence, and covering vehicles with straw mats. The drone strikes have not hindered al Qaeda’s ability to replace dead leaders with new ones. The drone strikes have proven to be affective, but has made the organization angry in the process. Al Qaeda has been able to attract new recruits and resources by broadcasting footage of drone strikes, portraying them as acts of violence against Muslims. With the drone strikes that result in civilian deaths, al Qaeda uses them to frame Americans and show …show more content…
The U.S Air Force trained 350-drone pilots in 2011 and only 250 bomber and fighter pilots were trained that year. There are a total of 16 drone operating and training sites across the United States with a 17th site in the works. There are also twelve U.S drone bases outside the U.S. More time and money are being spent on drones than on other capabilities, and can sometimes be useless with certain threats. Drones are very easy to shoot down, Drones must have clear airspace to operate, which would be useless against enemy’s like North Korea and Iran. Drones also require extensive maintence and have a high crash rate. Drones rely on cyber-connections to operate, which are increasingly vulnerable. Another problem with drones is that they destroy crucial evidence that could really benefit the U.S with counterterrorism. Whenever the U.S uses drones to kill suspected terrorist, they lose the chance to find out what he was planning, whether anyone else was involved or if he was even a terrorist. Drone attacks distinguish the chances of arresting and interrogating the suspected terrorist. Its important to note that drones don’t seize hard drives, organizational charts, strategize plans or secret correspondence, and the effectiveness of the drone is based on human operating. And humans are far from perfect, which just opens up a whole new door
The post 9/11 era in The United States defense policies have been one of proactive as compared to reactive. The United States has been looking at methods to gather intelligence on our enemy while ensuring the safety of our troops. The drone has been the answer to the search because the drone is capable of ensuring the U.S. life, forced projection of power over our enemies, and Strategic stealth tactical striking.
Byman’s first argument is that US drone strikes are extremely efficient in their purpose: eliminating high value targets in foreign countries that pose a threat to national security. He cities a study done by the New America Foundation, which found that “U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen” (Byman 1). Of these 3,300 militants, over 50 were senior leaders of either Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Additionally, drone strikes indirectly hinder communication between terrorist leaders and their operatives. In an effort to avoid detection, many foreign militants have stopped using cell phones and other electronic forms of communication. Although the elimination of technology makes it harder to find high value targets, it also significantly impacts their ability to communicate, which reduces the amount of organized attacks. Without considering the cost of civilian casualties or other negative impacts associated with the drone strikes, it is clear that UAV drones have been effective in eliminating foreign threats.
Evidence: Drones have many beneficial uses, including in search-and-rescue missions, scientific research, mapping, and more. But deployed without proper regulation, drones equipped with facial recognition software, infrared technology, and speakers capable of monitoring personal conversations would cause unprecedented invasions of our privacy rights. Interconnected drones could enable mass tracking of vehicles and people in wide areas. Tiny drones could go completely unnoticed while peering into the window of a home or place of worship.
The FAA works on the gradual incorporation of rules and considerations in order to guarantee security and privacy. The U.S. Congress expects that in 2015 commercial drones will be ready to fly under regulated circumstances, but experts said that it would be until 2020 that unmanned aerial system are fully integrated. Nevertheless, laws will be published step by step according to their complexity and grade of autonomy. First small drones will be allowed to fly than larger ones, first drones operated by a ground-based pilot than automate long distance flights, and areas wi...
The US military has used drones in the war against terrorist for years now and the use of drones for domestic use has become a popular dispute. A lot of Americans consider flying drones over private property violates the fourth Amendment and the only time a drone should be used is if the drone operator has a warrant and probable cause. It is considered trespassing by some if a warrant is not obtained. In 2013, 43 states debated 96 different drone regulating bills but only 8 of them passed. Along with legislatures, the FAA has also had trouble regulating drone flight. The government has manipulated the rules of privacy for years. In two separate but similar court cases, the police department used aerial surveillance to get Intel on marijuana farms. The owners of the farms declared that the method was unconstitutional and took it to court. The courts ruled in favor of the government, in saying that the helicopters were above a certain height of 1000 feet and it was not invading their
In contrast to this, drones strikes violate the authority of the counties they attack, most attacks are carried out without the authorization of the country .Pakistani Prime Sharif said that the "use of drones is not only a continued violation of our territorial integrity but also detrimental to our resolve at efforts in eliminating terrorism from our country... I would therefore stress the need for an end to drone attacks."( Anderson ). How are terrorist groups sopost to respect us when the example set is that invading other countries is complete okay. Not to mention that the fury by them and the rest of the country could lead someday to a devastating war or a massive attack. Adding to this United Nations ' Human Rights Chief has called US drone strikes a “violation of sovereignty” and have forced for investigations into the legality of the attacks. More of a reason for them to be remove from our
In the United States, people worried that drones would be used near their home because they equip with a camera and that make people feel restless or uncomfortable when a drone nearby. A lot of people don’t realize that drones flying around neighbor are not much,
Drone strikes have become a popular solution to taking out targets in the Middle East. Although their use is controversial, some say they are effective, and should be allowed, because of how effective they are at killing on the battlefield. Others argue that drones run a high risk of killing innocents, and shouldn’t be allowed. In addition some believe they are helpful at taking out targets, but they set a dangerous precedent that other nations could use. Drone strikes, otherwise known as targeted strikes, should be allowed because of their lower chances of killing the wrong target, low cost and elimination of risks of killing a soldier in battle because they’re operated thousands of miles away.
Drones are the Future One of the latest and most controversial topics that has risen over the past five to ten years is whether or not drones should be used as a means of war, surveillance, and delivery systems. Common misconceptions usually lead to people’s opposition to the use of drones which is the reason it is important for people to know the facts about how and why they are used. Wartime capabilities will provide for fewer casualties and more effective strikes. New delivery and surveillance systems in Africa, the United Air Emirates and the United States will cut costs and increase efficiency across the board. Rules and regulations on drones may be difficult to enforce, but will not be impossible to achieve.
Three months earlier, 18 male laborers, including a 14-year-old boy, were killed in a series of drone strikes on the remote village of Zowi Sidgi. The first one struck a tent where the men had gathered for an evening meal; others struck those who came to rescue the injured.” (“The Death of Innocents” 26) This incident shows one of many times where drone strikes have failed to do their job and the outcome was devastating. Drone strikes are inhumane and leave civilians wondering if death is around the
A lot of countries all over the world depend on technological advances to fight against their opponents. This reduced the risk of having a soldier wounded or dying in a war by making it easier with using these technologies when it comes to head to head combat. Even though using technologies are a great idea but many ethical issues arise from it. One of the main issue is the use of these Drones. This technology is developing more and more. In a recent study showed that there are over 700 active drone development all over the world and these programs are controlled under companies, research institutes, and the government. United States is mainly using these drones to fight against so called “terrorist” but some other countries use them as well. It is immoral and unethical to use these drones because it cause psychological disorders, violate privacy, cause deaths of innocent lives, and increase terrorism. (Reardon)
There are many different types of drones, with them comes various names that show exactly what the drones priority is. Assault drones, spy drones, UAV’s etc. The reason drones are becoming much more popular and used now is due to its cheap pricing of fuel, its efficiency in its ability to complete a set task. But using drones to deliver mail may be another story. The issue between these new ideas by the Australia Post is a simple low key fact that people are afraid of the drones because of its usage in the past, its reliability and as an unmanned machine in general.
According to Dr. Byman “The drones have done their job remarkably well: by killing key leaders and denying terrorists sanctuaries in Pakistan, Yemen, and, to a lesser degree, Somalia, drones have devastated al Qaeda and associated anti-American militant groups. And they have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused” (1). Any alternative action such as dropping bombs or putting boots on the ground is more dangerous to U.S. soldiers and to innocent people of that country. Bombings by F-16s or Tomahawk cruise missile salvos, for example, pack a much more deadly payload. In December 2009, the United States fired Tomahawks at a suspected terrorist training camp in Yemen, and over 30 people were killed in the blast, most of them women and children.
Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used to create turbulence at the global level. It has proved to be a powerful investigator and bomber at the same time. Drones are specifically associated with military actions and the countries having used them for surveillance purposes include UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Austria, Australia etc. The list of victim counties or nations is much bigger in contrast. Some prominent victims of Drone Air Strikes include Congo, Venice, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, it is also an undeniable fact that the massive production and usage of Drones got multiplied in the 21st century.
A couple of people say that drone will increase the number of terrorist, but that will only happen if the army of the United States inhuman, incorrectly, and carelessly. It is true that if a person sees a loved one get murdered, they will want to join the opposing force, but many of them will try to seek peace, so no more people die, or get injured. To avoid the situation where a pilot miss use a drone and hurt people on purpose, they should have some sort of higher rank watching them, or they can different training courses when it comes to using