Passover Supper

607 Words2 Pages

Clearly Scripture commands weekly participation in the Lord’s supper on Sunday for the purpose of remembering Jesus and His work on the cross; however, one is left to wonder who may participate in this memorial. If one examines the Passover feast, he will notice that uncircumcised foreigners were excluded from its observance (Ex. 12:43-49). The reason was because such a feast would have no significance to foreigners, so to them, it would be a mere meal. Similarly, someone who is not a Christian will not see the significance of the Lord’s supper and what it means to the people who are uniquely His. But who qualifies as someone who belongs to the Lord? A Christian is an individual who has submitted himself to God’s will by repentance and immersion …show more content…

An early Christian writing known as the Didache forbids un-immersed people from participating in the Lord’s supper (Witherington 91). Hippolytus, a third-century Christian writer, went so far as to say not even mice should be allowed to eat the bread of the supper (107). Outside of historical testimony, Scripture does not directly address the issue of non-Christians participating in the meal. However, since participation in the supper requires individual self-examination, no one serving the supper could be qualified to judge the individuals participating (1 Cor. 11:27-29; Hamilton, Should non-Christians Participate in the Lord’s Supper?). It might be unwise for non-Christians to participate, but it is not for the congregation to deny the supper to …show more content…

Paul speaks of an “unworthy” manner in his first letter to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 11:27). The lexical definition for this term is a careless or improper manner of doing something (Arndt 69). Three consequences plagued people who participated in an unworthy manner: guilt for the Lord’s blood and body, condemnation for being undiscerning, and physical sickness and even death (1 Cor. 11:27, 29-30). These lofty consequences affected these people because of how they treated the supper; to them, it was a common meal, and the poor members of the congregation were excluded (1 Cor. 11:21-22; Bailey 318). Division arose between the two groups, and Paul sternly rebukes them for their treatment of the supper (1 Cor. 11:18-19). In short, the “spiritual feast of love” turned into a “carnal feast of love” (McGarvey, Thessalonians, Corinthians, Galatians, Romans,

Open Document