Oral Contract Case Study

842 Words2 Pages

In the following paragraph, we will analyze the case by using some questions as a guard line. First, it is the definition and characteristics of the contract, offer, and acceptance. Second, it will about the nature of advertisement that appeared in the case. Third, we will talk about the relationship between Alan and Charles through analyzing and case study. Final, we will explain the oral contract occurs or not and the termination of an offer.

The contract is a voluntary, deliberate, and legally binding agreement between two or more competent parties. One party makes an offer that is accepted by the other party. If without mutual assent, there is no contract. Every contract must involve at least two parties that are the person who proposes …show more content…

Advertisement usually not offers unless clear intention. Invitation to treat is a contract law term, it includes the display of goods on shelves, it is not equal to offer; the advertisement of a price or an auction; and an invitation for tenders or competitive bids. As Alan saw an advertisement in the magazine of an antique vase which stating ‘On offer for $1,500,000’, owned by Charles, it is not an offer, just an invitation to treat and Alan have not made the decision for acceptance, therefore, the contract has not existed. Nowadays, there are many advertisements publish in magazines, such as diet, clothing and event promotions, they all have no legal consequence unless …show more content…

He made a phone call to Charles, he is an offeror, who state the amount of $1,250,000, Charles is an offeree, the plaintiffs made an offer to buy at a lower price. The offer was rejected and subsequently. So that, Charles rejected the offer by stating the amount of $1,400,000. At this moment, Charles become an offeror and Alan is an offeree. The rejection by Charles is treated as a counter offer, it also amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In this case, it has not had acceptance between Alan and Charles. Since Alan wanted a lapse of time of one week for thinking. By this case, there was held that no contract was made. Alan was no limits to the authority of Charles sold the vast to other people. He cannot prevent Charles and Eddie’s

Open Document