After a few minutes observing in the Union, Jaynie and I noticed a young man who was tabling for local apartment complexes. Accompanied by three women, this man was supposed to be soliciting participation in an activity where they attempted to unlock a door by selecting the right key from a bowl, getting their contact information, and distributing a free T-Shirt. While his female counterparts were hard at work greeting potential participants, the subject was on his phone. Jaynie and I decided to observe his on-phone behavior, as defined as “phone is in his hand, eyes and head oriented towards phone (for example, taking a selfie, texting, scrolling, looking at phone); a glance of one second or less does not count.” With this behavior, Jaynie and I sat two separate tables (so as to obtain the most independent observations as possible). Surreptitiously, we sat across the Union from so we had a …show more content…
We set an observation length for 10 minutes. Using our timers, we recorded the Start and Stop time of his on-phone behavior. Based on my observations, the subject was on his phone for a total of 97 seconds whereas Jaynie found that he was on his phone for 95 seconds. When looking at agreement on each second, Jaynie and I demonstrated 97% Interobserver Agreement (IOA). Overall, this was a very strong IOA. However, I feel our qualifier, “a glance of one second or less does not count” may have been the source of our disagreements. Although we discussed that this would be helpful because it would allow him to look briefly at a notification or check the time, I feel as though it may have ultimately been the source of our disagreement. Interestingly, we both felt as though the observation was not an accurate reflection of the behavior we observed informally. He was on his
The problem behavior associated with individuals making bad food choices when presented with unhealthy food will need to be observed so that we may understand how to change this behavior as it is unhealthy and harmful to health overall. Are poor choices in different foods causing obesity? Making poor choices when it comes to food is an
The article also talks about how we immediately pick up our phones. I have witnessed this happen at a concert before. In which the performers were trying to hype up the crowd but instead of everyone going along with it and dancing, people stood still phone in hand recording instead. I believe that smartphones have also caused people to lack the ability to live in the moment.
Amy Gahran, a media consultant exploring communication in the technology era, writes about how cell phones are significant. She feels that cell phones have changed our lives by providing “…vital services and human connections…offer new hope, even through simple broadcast text messages” (Gahran). Gahran is insisting that cell phones allow us to learn news quickly, connect with safety, and can even fight crime through video recordings (Gahran). In addition, she feels that the overall benefits of owning a cell phone outweigh any negatives. This somewhat challenges the ideas presented by Rosen because it points out more benefits of cell phones. In “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves” Rosen mentions that although cell phones indeed connect us with safety, they can often lead to a sense of paranoia. To expand, she writes that parents who give children a cell phone for security purposes, develop a paranoid sense of their community and lose trust in “social institutions” (Rosen). In making this comment, Rosen argues that although cell phones may be beneficial, they can change the way we view our world. Without a cell phone, many individuals feel vulnerable, as if their phone protects them from all possible dangers that they may encounter. In fact, a Rutgers University professor challenged his students to power off their phones for 48 hours and report back with their experience (Rosen). Many felt almost lost without it and one young women described the feeling “…like I was going to get raped if I didn’t have my cell phone in my hand” (Rosen). In reality, having a cell phone will not save a person’s life in all situations. Although many, including Gahran, feel a phone is a vital tool, it has changed how we feel about the world around us and how vulnerable we feel without a phone in
Whether aware or not, people are distracted by the mere presence of their smartphones and it disrupts how they think and act. With just a
Little do these parents know having a cell phone is hurting their social skills. Parents are worried about if their children are doing inappropriate things online or going to get hurt by cyberbullying,t when really they are worrying about the wrongs things. Bindley says,“But what about a more basic question like, Will they be able to hold their own in conversation!” (Katherine Bindley) Always staring at their phones texting their friends and peers is making it harder for them to be able to speak in person.Child psychologist Melissa Ortega notices the problems with high schoolers today from simply talking to them for a couple minutes. They avoid conversation by looking at their phones every two minutes to see if they received a text back. Binldey then says, “Another thing I’m noticing is they may have trouble initiating interactions, those small talk situations” (Katherine Bindley). They use text messages for small talk now to avoid the in person conversations. Just making small talk with a stranger when on an elevator is something of the past because of cell phones. There are no awkward situations when people can be scrolling on their phone instead of making conversation. Gary Small said, “We all know the story of kids breaking up with each other through text message. When you have to fire someone or give them bad news, it’s uncomfortable. In facetoface conversation, you’ve
” Carr uses this example to provide evidence of how smartphones pose as a distraction and interrupt students from their work. Carr also uses “nearly a hundred secondary schools.” This example is used so readers can grasp the large amount of schools that are involved in the issue. Lastly Carr uses “The subjects whose phones were in view posted the worst scores, while those who left their phones in a different room did the best.”
A social issue regarding the effect of incivility is the constant use of cell phones. When in public, people who are on their cell phones may be “so wrapped up ‘in their own little bubbles’ that they don’t even realize they’re blocking a sidewalk or holding up a line” (qtd. in Clay). This phenomenon is due to the fact that a human’s attention has a limited capacity and a selective nature (based on the research of Hermann von Helmholtz) and therefore, when their attention is on their phone, they’re “b...
The purpose of this study is to examine expectations that romantic partners have of cell phone usage during time spent together and how they manage violations of expectations. Using EVT as the analytical framework, in-depth, qualitative analysis of transcripts of focus groups with college students reveal that participants have expectations for undivided attention on formal dates and when spending intimate time together and divided attention when informally hanging out with one another. Participant’s responses are organized and rated on Likert scale, which makes this study
Today’s society accepted phones so fast and easily, that most of the things that can harm us, are actually some of our social norms that we don’t even realize we are doing. Cell phones can have effects on the way people think and act, their interactions with people in society, and the amount information people retain from the direct result of multi-tasking. Cell phones are a very important asset to people, and good resources of information, but they can have negative effects on people such as depression, anxiety, and addiction to the use of the cell phone. Distractions from cell phone use have also been linked to many motor vehicle accidents as well. Cell phones were created to make our lives better, and more efficient, but do they harm us more than help
People may think that digital devices have changed our life a lot, and they can use these digital devices to communicate with each other immediately at the same time. It is true that digital devices are more convenient and faster than traditional communication methods like writing letters. However, these digital devices will influence interpersonal relationships, and people do not know how to talk effectively. Many people spend more much time on digital devices than friends, relatives, and children. Personally, I have dinner with my friends on every Sunday night, but some of them always look at their cell phones while we are eating or sharing interesting stories. It is very impolite, and my interest in this dinner gradually decreases. Moreover, there is a phenom...
Galvan, V., Golloy, M. & Vessal, R. (2013). The effects of cell phone conversations on the attention and memory of bystanders. PLoS ONE, 8(3), 1-11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058579.
After reading the article “Technology Etiquette in the Workplace” By Ellen Reddick, I realize that I am in violation of many technology etiquette guidelines. One guideline I violate quite frequently is I do not turn away from the computer when holding a conversation. Even though most of the time I am doing work while conversing, I should be able to make time for people after I finish my work. In the article it says, “If you’re working on your laptop and someone enters the room to talk to you, close your laptop and focus on them” (Reddick, 2011 p.8). Even though we have computers at school, I still have to learn how to turn away from it, and I have to learn to focus on the person talking. Another guideline I violate with my phone is texting when it is not urgent. Being an average American teenager I am connected to my phone; I’m almost connected by the hip quite literally. It says in the article, “When you send people a text, in most cases you are interrupting them...If you are going to interrupt someone, make sure you
Social isolation may not be a huge threat at this point of time, however teenagers are taking their mobile and online conversations out of the home and into public areas. The terms interproximate and interkinesic communication are used to describe a mobile user who is in two places at once (Omotayo, Yiefeng, and Shyam, 2008). For example, you can be physically with the person, interproximate, but at the same time be on your mobile communicating with another person, interkinesic. In this case the person you are physically with will most likely be negatively impressed by the lack of enthusiasm for interaction. Through observation researchers were able to show that mobile phone users are using their devices as a “retreat” from the real world. While the researchers claimed that the use of mobiles in public places is exclusion, or isolation. A reason for that mobile users are engaging in interproximate and interkinesic communication comes from feeling the need to satisfy the us...
Cell phones are wonderment 's of technological advances over time. Though when do Cell phones become a tool that could be used to cause suffering, like in this case getting me in trouble. None the less, the time I was used my phone the wrong way not only got me in to trouble, but made me realize that I should think before I do.
Consider a situation where a family is sitting at the dining table, the son pulls out his iPhone, connects to Wi-Fi, and starts chatting with his friends on “Facebook”. The father has a Samsung Galaxy S4 in his hands and he is reading the newspaper online and using “Whatsapp” messenger while having his meal. The mother is busy texting her friends. They are all “socializing” but none of them has spoken as much as a single word to each other. This situation can be commonly seen nowadays.